“Had Plaintiffs wished to have their allegations judged under Heller or McDonald, they could have raised a claim under the Second Amendment,” the opinion noted. “But they chose to challenge HB 1224 solely on state constitutional grounds. [More]The graphic is a bit off because the argument was limited to the state constitution. Even if it had been 2A-centered, my read is that the robed apparatchiks would have found other reasons to "justify" their subversion.
Wednesday, July 01, 2020
Colorado Supreme Court Decision to Uphold Magazine Ban Skirted 2nd Amendment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment