Geofence warrants seek location data on every person within a specific location over a certain period of time. To work, those people must be using cellphones or other electronic devices that have the location history feature enabled. U.S. District Judge Hannah Lauck found that the warrant violated the constitution by gathering the location history of people near the bank without having any evidence that they had anything to do with the robbery. [More]
Hey, if you're not doing anything wrong, what have you got to hide? You're not disloyal, are you?
Sounds like the judge made a good call to me.
[Via Mack H]
2 comments:
"Sounds like the judge made a good call to me."
Indeed it is a great call.
Of course it's unconstitutional. So effing what. The Fed Gov does a LOT of things that are blatantly unconstitutional. Because there is NOBODY TO STOP THEM. They will continue doing this, and all the other illegal things the do. Because the can.
Post a Comment