See, that's the dilemma: If not Trump, who?
[More]
My friends at GOA say "Cruz." Disregarding his wife's Goldman Sachs affiliation, who doesn't believe Team Hillary won't challenge him on "natural born" citizenship -- and that they won't be right? Don't argue with me on that, refute
Alan Korwin's observations.
Rubio or Kasich? Not that they have the numbers, but if you want the amnesty/pathway to citizenship destruction of the Republic, and to make the Red-Blue Axis establishment happy, go for it. I note
NRA, Norquist, et al, have thus far shown deliberate indifference to trying to refute those concerns with anything other than misdirecting anecdotes and unsupported happy talk. That's because they can't, and that's because the numbers can't be manipulated to work in their favor. Most of them appear to be hoping if they don't acknowledge it, a critical mass won't learn about it, and they're probably right.
Mitt Romney, after he jumps in to "save" the sellouts responsible for making Trump so appealing to so many...? Really?
Carson? That doesn't seem likely to happen unless he joins the frontrunner as Veep wannabe and fate/intent intervenes.
All the energy and acrimony may stem from people deep down knowing there
is no alternative, and while everyone is having a cow over the number of angels on the head of a pin, "something wicked this way comes."
