An American University professor recently published a book in which he advocates to "repeal the Second Amendment." [More]He doesn't know that wouldn't invalidate a preexisting right or does he, and he's just counting on others not knowing? Is he incompetent, evil or both?
I know ad hominem is a logical fallacy, but when you see a professional liar trying to pull a con, the obligation to meet him under Queensberry Rules goes away. Absolved of that, the best response I've seen comes from comment poster John Walsh:
Worst.Toupée.Ever.[Via Michael G]











