The New Porker

New Yorker Suspends Jeffrey Toobin for Zoom Dick Incident - In a statement to VICE, Jeffrey Toobin apologized for the "embarrassingly stupid mistake." [More]

No, a mistake is when you're adding numbers and you don't carry over to the next column properly. 

A mistake isn't jerkin' your gherkin in front of an unsuspecting audience. Toobin was simply being a disgusting, perverted swine.

The New Yorker.

Only the best and the brightest, I see...

Ignoring Gun Owners

CNN's Jeffrey Toobin was recently on PBS, and made the ludicrous claim that the Heller decision somehow has something to do with tanks and SAMs. Toobin went on to say that gun control wasn't an issue for voters this year, because "swing voters don't care about it".

That, along with the "Republicans weren't moderate enough" lie are the two big delusions being pushed.

Perhaps it will result in overconfidence, and too much will be reached for too soon.

Regardless, some of us are through obeying.

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

Does Lubin' Toobin Even Have a Dog in This Fight?

 'The sky is falling': Jeffrey Toobin says 'doom is coming for Roe v. Wade' [More]

Oh, Jeffrey, get a grip!

A Worthy Goal

...gun control banned in 50 states...[More]

Jeffrey Toobin got so worked up there he popped his Rapex...

[Via Mack H]

The Toobin School of Elite Journalism

What do people prefer to be called? [More]

Kind'a makes me wonder  what he would call an assailant ramming a plunger handle up his bloody ... uh ... nose.  Besides "Darling."

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word 'People' Is

Generations of Supreme Court and academic opinion held that the amendment did not confer on individuals a right “to keep and bear Arms” but, rather, referred only to the privileges belonging to state militias. [More]

First off, no one but an ignoramus would argue the right is conferred.

Still, I  wonder how he'd explain what William Rawle. whose "View of the Constitution” was the standard Constitutional law text at leading universities in the early 19th Century, meant when he asserted:

“No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give the Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under a general pretence by a state legislature. But if in any pursuit of an inordinate power either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both.”

And then he could produce the decision contradicting the 1856 Supreme Court, which noted that if they were recognized as citizens, blacks would be able "to keep and carry arms wherever they went."

I wonder if Toobin would like to try the test ACLU failed.

[Via Michael G]