Sunday, February 18, 2007

BREAKING NEWS: REMINGTON TERMINATES RELATIONSHIP WITH ZUMBO

A comment on the Zumbo blog was purported to be by Tommy Millner, CEO of Remington.

I wanted to verify before posting about it, and sent him the following:
Mr. Millner,

I have seen a statement attributed to you on Jim Zumbo’s blog, but unfortunately there is no way to authenticate that it really came from you.

I would like to post your statement unedited, in its entirety on my blog. Care to give one?

Thank you,

David Codrea

I just received the following reply:



RELATED READING

"I Also Play by the Rules"

To all those promoting Wayne Fincher’s being elevated to folk hero status for breaking the law, enough already. The argument of Second Amendment violation in this circumstance is ridiculous. Neither the Constitution, nor the Bill of Rights contains a single word about automatic weapons. Also absent is any mention of anti-tank weapons, driving under the influence, dealing drugs at the local schoolyard or child pornography. These are all issues we, as a society, have deemed to be generally bad ideas, and we put in place laws to deal with the excesses of others.

Mr. Fincher’s case is not a Second Amendment case. It is a case about not following the rules, or more precisely, interpreting the rules to suit one’s own interests.

Before dismissing this as another letter from the fringe, I am a gun enthusiast, a consultant to the firearms industry, NRA member, and I hold a federal firearms license. I also play by the rules.

Russ Whitfield

Fort Smith
Congratulations, Russ.

Jim Zumbo couldn't have said it any better.

If the Wayne Finchers of this country all fall, their enemies will turn their attention to the useful rule-playing idiots soon enough.

New WarOnGuns Poll: How Will YOU Vote?

See the left margin for the new poll. What do we do, people, keep accepting the "lesser of two evils" because it's "pragmatic"?

Results of last week's poll:

If armed resistance to governmental overreach became necessary, would you:

Hunting With Dumbo

I call them "assault" rifles, which may upset some people. Excuse me, maybe I'm a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity. I'll go so far as to call them "terrorist" rifles.
I know resorting to ad hominem attacks is inferior to attacking the idea, but Jim Zumbo's arguments are so damned stupid, ignorant and downright treasonous, I can't help but consider the source.

This is "one of the country's most well known and respected outdoorsmen"? He might as well be writing Brady press releases.

Yo, genius: You don't think they'll be coming after your "sniper rifles" next, you "animal murderer"?

[Via Nathan F]

UPDATE: The Pistolero and JR include some links to other bloggers covering this.

Nagin's in Contempt...

...but the NRA/SAF mouthpiece padded his bill.

Again, we run into the same lack of plain decency I've been pointing out since I began covering the press releases on cases the two groups jointly supported:

Again and
again and
again and
again and
again and
again...

NRA-ILA does not give any credit to SAF.

SAF always gives joint credit to NRA.

I guess the guys in the nice suits at Fairfax believe what their apologists maintain--that every dime going to another organization is "diverted" money.

[Link to contempt order via Cousin G]

A Foregone Conclusion

British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced a major review of firearms laws in the UK on Sunday, following a spate of fatal shootings in London.
You don't think there's any chance he'll conclude they contribute to the problem, do you?

[Via Cousin G]

Why She's Poor

"They say this country is so rich, but why are so many people living paycheck to paycheck, just one week from being in the street?"
While not gun rights-related, this has all the elements employed by the gun banners, that is, blaming everything BUT poor individual choices and abdication of personal responsibility. It really is a very good essay by The Free Citizen.

Carnival Time...

...at Free Constitution.

Go on over and find "the best 2nd Amendment coverage the blogosphere has to offer."

This Day in History: February 18

From Norfolk, Virginia, Royal Governor John Murray, 4th Earl of Dunmore, dispatches a note to William Legge, 2nd Earl of Dartmouth, expressing his "inexpressible mortification" that British Major General Sir Henry Clinton had been ordered to the "insignificant province of North Carolina to the neglect of this the richest and powerfully important province in America." Dunmore was facing expulsion from Virginia at the hands of the Patriots and was deeply insulted that the army chose to defend its claims to the less significant colony of North Carolina instead of the economically and politically vital colony of Virginia.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Time for Another 2A Carnival


Over at Stan's place, tomorrow.

If you have a blog post you want to submit, get it to him today--and please don't wait until the last minute. It ain't easy getting everything done, especially if you're rushing it.



[Image "swiped" from Free Constitution:) ]

A Compromise I Can Live With

I have been accused of being an extremist in defense of the right to own and to carry, anywhere you see fit, any type of weapon whatsoever, in any way you wish, without asking permission from anyone. I suppose it is time to reconsider and announce I am ready to accept "reasonable gun laws".
Ordinarily, I'd blast a presidential candidate for suggesting a compromise involving gun rights. But in this case, I think I'll get behind the effort.

Airline Passengers Bill of Rights

See the 3rd comment down...

Positively UnAmerican


Think he's got plenty of armed security?

[Via John Schaefer]

I Think John Just Got It

John H. Adler believes that Americans who believe in the Constitutionally guaranteed fundamental human right of the individual to keep and bear arms "don't get it."
So Kurt Hofmann gives it to him. And how.

We're the Only...What Did You Say About My Mother?

A New York man, enraged that his girlfriend had been ensnared in a drug probe, is himself facing a felony rap for a vulgar telephone tirade directed at the parents of a federal agent.
I had mixed feelings about posting this one, knowing the way most of us would react. Still, I find it hard to believe that felony charges would be filed were a non- "Only One" was involved.

WARNING: Title link goes to story with graphic language.

[Via Bounty Hunter]

Ammo Control in Jersey

Yeah, that'll solve all their problems.

Be sure and follow the links to the press release and actual "report."

Well, we knew it was coming.

[Via Paul Nelson]

"And for Other Purposes"

H.R. 1022: To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes
Well of course. Nobody informed really thinks it's about controlling guns, do they?

The "no cosponsors" at this point is interesting. We'll keep an eye on this one...

In the mean time, do all the usuual stuff--inform your friends, and go ahead and write your reps if you think it won't give them evil pleasure. I don't bother with Jane Harman, but that's just based on bitter experience...

[Via Les K]

This Day in History: February 17

The worldwide implications of the American War for Independence are made clear on this day in history as the American-allied French navy begins a 14-month-long series of five battles with the British navy in the Indian Ocean.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Love "Only Ones" Style

Maybe it's because it's Valentine's Week, maybe there's just something in the air, but these all came to my attention in literally the space of a few hours yesterday--I did not set out looking for them.


WARNING: The stories are "adult" in nature, that is, if you consider sexual predation and perversion to be adult qualities. If you think you might be offended, stop reading now.



We're the Only Ones Rubbed the Wrong Way Enough
At least six Inglewood police officers are suspected of having on- and off-duty sex at massage parlors and other adult businesses targeted in a recent crackdown on the businesses, according to officials. Acting Chief Julius Davis said his department is investigating the allegations of sexual favors in exchange for protection from prosecution, but he added that there is no evidence of criminal acts.

"We have not found anything that indicates there's any criminal conduct involved," Davis said.

No, of course not, Chief. Between that and the rape the FBI is investigating, the mask-wearing, the gun-pointing, the exposing, the fact that nobody's been fired and you're conducting your own hen house investigation, why on earth would anyone suspect a crime has been committed? It sounds like just another day at the Inglewood PD...

We're the Only Ones Gender-Bending (Over) Enough
City Council members have asked the state attorney general's office to investigate claims of sexual misconduct, racism and brutality at the police department after residents complained officers were mistreating Hispanic immigrants.

What, you mean declaring itself a "sanctuary city" just ensured an undocumented victim pool in Maywood that could be exploited? Who could have guessed?

My favorite revelation:
One of the claims under investigation is that a high-ranking officer forced a transsexual man to have sex with him multiple times over seven years, the newspaper reported.

We're the Only Ones Coming Into Your Life (and Your Open Car Window) Enough
No one disputes that an on-duty Irvine police officer got an erection and ejaculated on a motorist during an early-morning traffic stop in Laguna Beach. The female driver reported it, DNA testing confirmed it and officer David Alex Park finally admitted it.

Hmmm. Sounds like a moving violation.

[Via Tavis S]

We're the Only Ones Exposed Enough

Former U.S. Rep. Joseph M. McDade has been charged with exposing himself to two women Jan. 18 near a southwest Florida beach, police there said Wednesday.

You'll recall that the "Only Ones" designation isn't reserved exclusively for LEOs, but applies to all government elites "with power and abilities far beyond those of mortal men."

I went after McDade over 10 years ago, first because he was a Republican who supported the federal "assault weapons" ban, but also, because when indicted for conspiracy, bribery and racketeering, the coward tried to use the Constitution's speech or debate clause to claim legal immunity.


"Isn't it hypocritical," I wrote at the time, "that this individual should reject the plain language of the Bill of Rights and then use a cynically manipulative misinterpretation of that same Constitution in a desperate attempt to save his skin?"

It looks like this time, McDade doesn't need anyone else to expose him for being what he is.

[More from "The Only Ones" files...]

Boycott Succeeds in Removing Signs

A handful of local gun owners say they plan to boycott - when they can - businesses that post signs prohibiting concealed handguns under the state's new concealed carry law.
Mall Manager Dan Flores, who supports posting "No Guns" signs, just doesn't get it, does he?
"Just look at what happened at the Trolley Center," he said, referring to a shooting this week at a Utah mall, where a teen killed five people.
Yeah, just look, Dan. Those signs sure work great.

And in spite of her removing the signs, I'm afraid I'd still avoid anything run by A. J. Connard because of this life-endangering belief:
I'm not that afraid of people coming in with guns. I just turn myself and my employees over to the big man upstairs."
It reminds me of that old joke: "I sent you a boat, I sent you a helicopter..."

WarOnGuns regulars will recall this card, available as a free download to serve your boycotting needs...