Friday, August 08, 2008

We're the Only Ones Compromised Enough

Couple appeared to be innocent victims of pot smuggling scheme...

Prince George's County Police Chief Melvin High said Wednesday that Calvo and his family were "most likely ... innocent victims," but he would not rule out their involvement, and he defended the way the raid was conducted. He and other officials did not apologize for killing the dogs, saying the officers felt threatened...

[O]fficials insisted they acted within the law, saying the operation was compromised when Calvo's mother-in-law saw officers approaching the house and screamed.
We talked about this earlier. Anyway, I know exactly what they mean. Who doesn't kill dogs when they hear a woman scream? Why should "Only Ones" be any different?

[Via half a dozen of you]

2 comments:

Kurt '45superman' Hofmann said...

I think we've found the culprit here. If that no-good mother-in-law had just kept her trap shut, all would be well, and there would be no question of "Only Ones" needing to apologize.

Anonymous said...

Law enFORCEment officers participating in entrapment SHOULD feel threatened.
By the way, five TONS of the party drug ecstasy has been found in an Australia warehouse disguised as canned tomatoes.
People still try to smuggle drugs into Singapore even though the penalty is death.
There was this king named Pyrrhus...