Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Anyone Who Can't Be Trusted with a Gun...

...can't be trusted with any tool. [Read]

And thus, can't be trusted without a custodian.

[Via Smiley Starfish]

4 comments:

Crotalus (Dont Tread on Me) said...

Uh huh. And where are the Bradys now?

Defender said...

Cragun has previous convictions for drug possession, domestic violence assault, attempting to elude police, drunken driving and battery.

Now he has graduated. How proud his enablers in The System must be.
Good thing his four victims didn't have a gun and take the law into their own hands for some vigilante justice. Someone might have gotten hurt.

Anonymous said...

Must. Outlaw. Hammers.

Mark Roote said...

when people tell me they are afraid of people openly carrying guns (like i do), i ask them if they are just as afraid of a man carrying a hammer? they usually tell me no, it's not the same thing.
really? "Cragun’s girlfriend told investigators Cragun often carried a hammer but that he isn’t capable of hurting anyone, and if he did, it would only be in self defense"
who was he "defending" when he attacked that family?
who among you "often carries a hammer" when not at a job that requires one?
i never thought my analogy of a hammer being just as deadly as a handgun would prove itself this blatantly (he's got about the same kill rate as most murderers involved in a shootout, doesn't he?)