Just Another Opposite Day in Proziland

Right, advocating women claim the choice to empower themselves is bad, as is appreciating feminine beauty. [More]

I guess Mother Jones senior editor Mark Follman must know a thing or two about being a non-masculine object of degradation...

And sorry, troll "readinamazement"-- you offer pretty unorignal and expected fare for a sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor, right down to anonymously calling other men cowards.

Funny thing about anti-gun males: they rage against guns and accuse men who own them of being inadequate --  yet they know ultimately, they are personally helpless to do anything about their hatred but rail.  In other words, they're furious because they know they're impotent.

What Sort, Indeed?

What you've got to ask is what sort of cravenly person wastes invective on me? [More]

A sadist/psychopath, Mike. An infiltrator/disruptor. Tellingly, someone who needs to, which means you're actually the one who has power over him. And yes, absolutely, a coward who must hide, because he knows what he is and is terrified others will see.

Such a demon-haunted creature cannot be happy or loved, or even genuinely liked. Talk about pathetic.

Nor is anonymity for perpetuity something anyone can count on. Trolls have been unmasked in the past and those hunting them are getting better at it, developing new capabilities and tools.

I doubt that headcase is sophisticated enough to cover his tracks against someone who knows what he's doing. They've stepped up to the plate before: perhaps your friends can help with retaining a consultant.

I wouldn't be surprised if, some day, you'll be able to buy software to do the job.

---

UPDATE-- the comments troll continues to crave attention. I said he's done here, and he is, but this one is too rich to pass up-- just received this:

You solicited multiple federal crimes on behalf of a third party. You should call a lawyer. That's black letter RICO. All that remains is to see how bad the USJD wants to seat a grand jury and destroy you. "DONE" was you the instant you posted your open solicitation for retaliation for a comment not made on your blog. You might slip by this one. Then again maybe not. But the Federals hate you, and Federal vengeance never sleeps. Sooner or later, they'll come for you.

Laughing at you here, you fool, but just to throw your pathetic ignorance back in your face, go for it: Tip 'em off: https://tips.fbi.gov/.

I "confess" that I meant everything I wrote above. I am offering a thousand dollars as the bounty to the first person who turns me in for this, to be paid upon my conviction on "black letter RICO" charges for what I wrote here. Anyone else reading this who wants to see me "DONE," feel free to forward this post link to the FBI, as I am certain puss boy here doesn't have the guts to do anything more than make ignorant, anonymous noise.

Like I said, pathetic.

Matter of fact, hold on a sec --  I'll snitch on myself, and the thousand will go to the troll on my conviction, provided he publicly identifies himself and proves he's the one.  I'll be right back.

UPDATE 2:

https://twitter.com/dcodrea/status/711656844993929216

Make Them Outed and Ruined

“One of our site’s moderators will review your submission, verify your contact information, and after receiving your confirmation, publish the information you provided us (minus any personally identifying info) on the list page on our site,” the FAQ page tells individuals who wish to submit an accusation. [More]

Typical sadist/psychopath behavior for trolls. Naturally, the coward running the website protects his own identity by proxy registration.

So if accused, demand the webpage take it down, publicly apologize to you and dox the accuser whose entry they approved. If they refuse, have a subpoena ordering disclosure issued. Then sue everyone involved for libel.

If you can't afford to, make your case known and supporters can either help find a legal firm that specializes in justice against "progressive" filth or help with a crowdfunding project to pay a lawyer specializing in defamation cases. Plenty of us would be happy to help publicize demonstrable cases of false accusations.

Join the Debate?

Once he resorts to insults like "current phallo-gun open-carry nuts," that is, immediately, comment poster "Burk" reveals himself to be a sadist/psychopath and an infiltrator/disruptor, and is owed no more consideration in the virtual world than you would give an assailant in the real one -- aside from repelling him. [More]

Looks Like I'm Living in Someone's Head Rent-Free

That's certainly an interesting reaction to my saying I wanted to take a walk in the first snow of the season. It looks like somebody holds a bitter grudge against Mike's memory and against me. What could we have done to inspire such raw hatred?

Is this an anti-gunner troll?

The "sadist/psychopath" part seems about right. But something in the language and some of the terminology, "porch humping" for instance, is  unique to what I've seen before. But where?

Oh, yeah -- I remember seeing it over at Wirecutter's a while back.

It seems to fit.

What a consumed by hatred, devoid of meaning and lonely life this pathological, obsessed freak must lead. And what a personal coward he must be, to so savagely attack another while hiding behind a mask of anonymity and presumed unaccountability.

Bottom line: he's afraid of me. He's no doubt afraid of a lot.

So it will hardly surprise me to find out he's lying about desecrating and vandalizing Mike's grave. On the off chance that he's not, I'll be happy to share my blog's stat files with investigators.

A Self-Invited "Guest"

[More]

We can test that criticism..

Para 1: ...Prince Law Offices, P.C., announced Tuesday.

Para 2: ...a press release ...announced.

Para 3: The City settled in spite of maintaining ... and after further insisting...

Para 4: ...the release explains.

Para 5: ... the release elaborates.

Para 6 has no quote, but nonetheless provides a link to corroborate its assertion.

Even someone who is reading-challenged would not miss all of those. What we have is one of those anonymous sadist/psychopath/infiltrator/disruptors who decided to come over and do what people who want us disarmed do. Lie and insult in order to divert attention from news they'd rather see suppressed.

Ugh.

I point this out merely to ... uh ... point that out.

Sailing with the Blunderbuss

[More]

Normally, I follow a "don't feed the sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor" position until such time as one offers lemons so juicy they're just begging to be turned into lemonade (like yesterday's "rumor"). So I've resisted giving this ...thing... any attention for her numerous frustrated and insulting rants until this one, which provided just too valuable a disclosure to pass up.

This is what those who want our guns believe. That's all we need to know.

Lotta Comments Going On...

Yesterday's GRE has stirred up no small amount of observations and attracted the usual crop of sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptors.

I do see one guy, nominally on our side, arguing Hitler was a creature of the right  and not a socialist, citing as "proof" the economic fascism he engaged in with German industrialists.  It's a common ploy of latter day national socialists, to accuse people who believe in freedom of being Nazis, and to put distance between themselves and the inevitable evil fruits that always result from their gaining political power.

They're counting on people falling for that, like our hapless comment poster.

Don't let them.  Because like everything the Opposite Day Prozis try to deceive people on, it's a self-serving lie.

Speaking of "Progressives"...

One of those  sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptors is trying to reframe the terms to exempt his brand of "pure" collectivism.

Gosh, "Newspeak" to discourage all but approved communication. No one's ever thought of that before.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

The good -- this comment, left under yesterday's column by WoG Correspondent "russn8r":

Your philosophical forefathers also had courts in NAZI Germany, the Soviet Union, Communist China, communist Mexico during the Cristero Wars, communist Cambodia, Rwanda, Guatemala, Turkey, and other places, to "protect" the people after you disarmed them with gun control. Yet tens of millions of defenseless victims were murdered BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS after your gun controls disarmed them and left them totally defenseless.

The bad --  the comment has not appeared and has been "awaiting moderation" since yesterday. That probably means the Prozis have been flagging it as "offensive."  It also reflects defective moderation, as several times over the past week they've let spam comments through that I've had to email them about with delete requests.  And they also let vicious troll comments through, which brings me to...

The ugly -- the comment was in response to a troll (that is, a demonstrable sadist-psychopath / infiltrator/disruptor), who in typical "progressive" fashion, along with demanding no guns and urging everyone to join Everytown in the various steaming piles he's dropped all over the comments section, tells a pro-gun woman to "Please have that fascist gash of yours sealed so as not to produce defective brats we have to support" and then concludes "She's probably a lesbian anyway."

I find it encouraging.  The totalitarians have nothing else, and every time they resort to Alinsky Rule 5, which is every time they troll, they further demonstrate that for "progressives," every day IS Opposite Day.

Other Key Facts

Comment from "Carlos Perdue" under yesterday's GRE:

Excellent article. Another key fact, Obamacare passed cloture with exactly 60 votes. Only one Democrat would have needed to be flipped and it never would have passed. On Christmas eve day 2009, the day of the cloture vote, the NRA had 10 "A" & "A+" rated Dems, 2 "B" rated (including Harry Reid), and 4 "C" rated. They could've easily flipped one D for the reasons Mr. Codrea points out. But they followed the establishment Republican/NRA tradition and worked with Reid & Obama to "fix" a socialist program, giving "A" & "B" rated Dems in pro-gun states the necessary cover to vote for it. Doesn't take much searching to find articles with statements like this: "U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wrote the now famous Obamacare gun provision which he inserted into PL 111-148 with the help of NRA President Wayne LaPierre. Why would a Democrat, Senator Reid, do this? When Senator Reid was up for re-election a couple years ago, he (a well known gun advocate) contacted Mr. LaPierre to help him get gun owners to vote for him." The NRA is responsible for the passage of Obamacare. But the NRA can now undo the damage and play the key role in repealing it. For the reasons Mr. Codrea discusses, now that 0-care is increasingly unpopular with the electorate and even anti-gun Democrats like Schumer are showing buyer's remorse, if the NRA does the right thing it could be easier in 2015 to get a 2/3 majority of those voting (e.g. 12 D votes for 66/99), than it would've been to get just one vote to kill it in the first place on Christmas eve day 2009. That's because it may again be the case that all the NRA has to do is flip one vote and the rest will follow, like the cascading fall of the Iron Curtain after Poland legalized Solidarity and it won 99% of the seats up for election, followed by the mass defection of 600 East Germans into Austria at the Pan-European Picnic. Given Zerocare's unpopularity and buyer's regret, it would most assuredly be far easier to get one "A" to flip now than it would've been in 2009, even though there are not as many "A" rated Dems now. But chances are the NRA would get every "A", and some or all "Bs" and "Cs", and indirectly some Ds and Fs, like Schumer. The NRA can be pressured to do the right thing by members, gun rights activists and conservatives calling talk shows, and by quitting NRA and moving to Gun Owners of America. GOA identified Obamacare as gun control and a Trojan Horse confiscation vehicle from day one, still maintains that position, and never fell for the Reid-NRA "fix". Similarly, the NRA is the key to winning the immigration/amnesty issue. The same pressure can be applied to get the NRA to stop indirectly supporting amnesty and excessive immigration. GOA has been alone among national gun rights groups in identifying invasion and amnesty as the great destroyer of gun rights in America, pointing to the tragic immigration-induced loss of California and studies showing that today's immigrants, including Catholics, come from corrupt, anti-freedom, anti-gun cultures and continue to lean heavily Democrat, socialist, and anti-gun after they get here despite craven establishment-Republican his pandering efforts. Others such as Rush Limbaugh observe that "Amnesty is Republican Party Suicide" -- which means it is also permanent gun rights suicide.

Those are important factors to include in the mix.  Compare them to this bit of "apologia":

Looks like the type of "reasoned" sentiment we routinely see from self-styled "pragmatists" arguing limited "political capital," doesn't it?  Thing is, a quick click on the guy's DISQUS profile shows other comments including "Another Teahadist meets her maker" in response to a "gundeath" from someone who actually appeared to be one of his. That marks him as a troll, acting out the demonstrable sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor role that defines such pathetic moral and intellectual defectives.

Still, the comment is not without value -- just as we see editorials and statements by doctrinaire Democrats advising what Republicans should do on this or that issue -- under the guise of being helpfully observant, of course -- what's really happening is they're hoping idiots will be persuaded to put their (and our) heads in a noose. What's obvious is, "progressives" do not want NRA to become more effective by including issues that impact gun rights in the scoring criteria -- and that ostensible "pro-gun" voices discouraging that by crying "Single issue!" (a demonstrably false excuse) are pulling on the same side of the rope as the gun-grabbers.

They can try, but there's no getting around that key fact.

Feeding the Trolls

Comments under yesterday's offering:

I find it illustrative. It also further corroborates the sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor truism.

That's all they've got. The attention they seek works against them, not us.

They must be very frustrated individuals.

What a Coward

Yeah, I'm talking to you, "Anonymous." You are a coward. [More]

You're also a sadist-psychopath /  infiltrator-disruptor. Not to mention broken-record boring.

You are demonstrably consumed by your sick need to lash out with obsessed hatred from the shadows, hiding from everyone because you're afraid.

Hiding from me.

Why Public Health Needs a New Gun Doctrine

You read that correctly. I am a public health professional. 
And I like guns. 
This make me a heretic in American public health, where embracing firearms and the rights of gun owners is a gross violation of orthodoxy. [More]

VIK KHANNA fires an important return salvo against the agenda "scientists."  As such, it's important that you read and share this, and give him some intelligent support against the sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor trolls who are emerging in "comments," furious at having their state worship challenged by this... this infidel.

Make sharing the link to his essay and urging others to do so as well today's Five-Minute Activism project.

Bloomberg Hiding under GunLobbyWatch.com Troll Bridge

We have to wonder who GLW is, who funds it and why. [More]

Which is a routine tactics of trolls who hide in the shadows, thinking they're immune to repercussions and accountability.  Note how their "About" section doesn't tell you a thing about who is behind it. And their website is registered by proxy through Panama.

No Guidestar hits, either. They really don't want people finding out who they are. Again, seeing as how trolls are cowards, who would that surprise?

And what else do we know about trolls?  Oh yes-- they're sadists and psychopaths.  And infiltrators/disruptors.

I wouldn't worry overmuch, though. The AstroTurf peels right up if you want to look under it. For instance: 481 Facebook page "likes"? 580 Twitter followers?Their only YouTube video has 18 views, one of them being mine when I clicked on the link just to see how successful they are at propagating their message?

You know what else peels up?

The curtain, to see the "man" behind it.

Dave Workman noted Gun Lobby Watch was announced last July by the "Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility."

Here's their nonprofit corporate filing with the Secretary of State. See the agent's name is Philip Lloyd? He was also Director for the Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund for I-594.

Did someone say "Follow the money"?

Yes, Gomer. You can say it now.

This is a Bloomberg operation.  He's the twisted sadist/psychopath hiding behind all the layers and under the bridge, and enabling all the troll attacks.

Enter the Disruptor

[More]

Oh, look: a  sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor.  You can tell, because he can't refute anything documented, so he instead resorts to being obnoxious in a ham-handed attempt at Rule 5 that only says much about himself.

While I don't feed trolls, I do exploit them.

And the Trolls Show Up in 3...2...1,,,

[More]

And a blog post about more internet trolls!

You guys are useful, too!  Not as exploitable as "Cesar," but certainly good for reaffirming the sadist-psychopath / infiltrator-disruptor truism.  So thanks, welcome, and keep it up!

Dissecting a Troll

This one seems to spend his waking hours on AmmoLand. [More]

It's pathetic when you think about it, but it evidently gives aggresive cowards the attention they crave without any meatspace blowback. Still, I gotta give this guy props, because when it comes to the whole point of trolling, infiltrating and disrupting, he generally succeeds, albeit, I perceive he's doing it on his own because he's just not that sharp.

Which means he perfectly fits the research profile of being a "sadist and psychopath." Not that confronting such defects with reality would make them do anything but double down -- as we saw with that unmasked Antifa total loser at life.

Why does Aesop come to mind...?

In any case, I don't recommend feeding trolls, but just thought a reminder about what drives them wouldn't hurt. In a way, if you think about that, and about how their lives are so empty and pointless such pursuits consume them, a part of me pities them.

Speaking of Fantasy Worlds...

YAEL T. ABOUHALKAH of The Kansas City Star invites us to his. [More]

I'm sure this covers all situations for everyone, and he's perfectly qualified and competent to be dispensing defensive instruction to his readers.  I don't suppose he'll share his credentials with them or anything? I mean, how can his not be the last word in authoritative insights, what with quoting Mother Jones and John Stewart and all...?

My favorite part of this, though, comes from "comments":

Interesting how AnonyJohn here chose an armed insurrectionist for his avatar and screen name.  I don't suppose the contradiction, going from "It's not an effort to get rid of all the guns" to "really serious effort needs to be done to disarm the public" in the very next sentence registers with this wretched creature as a disconnect?

All of his insulting and ignorant posts fits the classic troll profile: Both psychopath and sadist, and infiltrator and disruptor. Remember that about them. They cannot hurt you unless you let them and they know that.