It puts the state in the position of defining what is a legitimate news publication.What have we been saying about "authorized journalists"?
Besides--what kind of idiot would think we're entitled as sovereign individuals to free political speech?
Notes from the Resistance...
It puts the state in the position of defining what is a legitimate news publication.What have we been saying about "authorized journalists"?
4 comments:
Wow...just...wow!!! The private citizen can't endorse a candidate because he's not a "legitimate" news source?!? This is absolutely appallling!!! So much for the 1st Amendment! I say, go ahead and endorse him anyway, and tell the commission to bugger off!
That smells too much like the idea that a right of "the people" is not an individual right; similar to the bogus redefining of the term in the second amendment done by some parties. If they can bugger the first and second amendments in that manner, you might as well scratch off all the other rights also.
When they get to the level of mind reading, they're gonna be real mad when they get to me.
"When they get to the level of mind reading, they're gonna be real mad when they get to me."
+1
Post a Comment