A police marksman who wounded a suspect during an anti-terror raid stumbled during the operation and accidentally fired his gun, the police complaints bureau ruled Thursday, exonerating the officer of any wrongdoing.Safety off. Finger on the trigger. Shoots a non-"Only One".
Yep.
"In the circumstances, I conclude that the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offense."Sounds about right to me. Who except a non-"Only One" could possibly conclude otherwise? And they don't matter.
And note we know the name of the "suspect," Mohammed Abdul Kahar, and even how old he is, "23."
Quick--what's the name of the "police marksman", I mean "the officer"?
Thanks, Watchdog Press! That must be why you're "authorized journalists" and we're not!
[Thanks to K Romulus]
1 comment:
"In the circumstances, I conclude that the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offense."
That is the reason for the second amendment. So that we may disabuse ourselves of a self-anointed aristocracy.
Post a Comment