This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
See how many times he can say "required to surrender" in one short letter? Yet, he can't give an example of her doing anything that justifies his "requirement". So he must be insane. I think that disqualifies him from carrying. At least to parasites who think like him.
Can anyone in that area tell me what the best bets would be to send letters to the editor about this? I know some regional and local newspapers are better than others. I can find addresses on line, but won't necessarily have a good idea which ones to concentrate on.
Letters to the editor about this would not only encourage the lady, but could educate some of the people who live around her.
Join me, won't you? Just be respectful. Just because the "only ones" are not is no reason for us to be nasty.
Some people were upset, therefore your *privilege* is rescinded. Funny, we thought King George III was the one that was dead. The King's Men live on. God help us all if "upsetting" the local herbivores is all it takes now. I could cite a soccer game during which someone had an impromptu machete amputation of their arm by a gang member -- and my state legislature suggests a law prohibiting concealing machetes. One of the Virginia Tech victims' parents who want more restrictions on gun sales was very vocal about Tech's failure to even do the MINIMUM to protect 20,000 students after two students were found shot dead. Yet he really hates the idea of anyone closer to the agent of doom being able to do anything either. I guess you HAVE TO have it both ways to impose your socialist paradise.
This is certainly true, but for some of us it may also be considered an act of attempted murder, or at the very least something along the lines of "enforced negligent homicide".*
To try and take my liberty is to try and take my life. Proceed at your peril.
If anyone would be shocked, shocked at my taking appropriate action to such naked aggression, they can bloody well tap me on the shoulder and have an adult conversation with me about it, without having to involve the Enforcer-Thug Caste at all.
* Apparently I'm into oxymorons today. It seems to go with the territory. Still, I'd rather it make no sense than consider the other possibility--that it's a deliberate act of attrition...
8 comments:
I can say "cocksuckers" on your blog, can't I?
I'd actually prefer that you didn't.
See how many times he can say "required to surrender" in one short letter? Yet, he can't give an example of her doing anything that justifies his "requirement". So he must be insane. I think that disqualifies him from carrying. At least to parasites who think like him.
Unfortunately I am outraged at this letter. Consequently, he should turn in his badge and gun.
Can anyone in that area tell me what the best bets would be to send letters to the editor about this? I know some regional and local newspapers are better than others. I can find addresses on line, but won't necessarily have a good idea which ones to concentrate on.
Letters to the editor about this would not only encourage the lady, but could educate some of the people who live around her.
Join me, won't you? Just be respectful. Just because the "only ones" are not is no reason for us to be nasty.
Some people were upset, therefore your *privilege* is rescinded.
Funny, we thought King George III was the one that was dead. The King's Men live on.
God help us all if "upsetting" the local herbivores is all it takes now.
I could cite a soccer game during which someone had an impromptu machete amputation of their arm by a gang member -- and my state legislature suggests a law prohibiting concealing machetes.
One of the Virginia Tech victims' parents who want more restrictions on gun sales was very vocal about Tech's failure to even do the MINIMUM to protect 20,000 students after two students were found shot dead. Yet he really hates the idea of anyone closer to the agent of doom being able to do anything either. I guess you HAVE TO have it both ways to impose your socialist paradise.
We are revoking your license to carry a firearm because you carried a firearm. I'm going to go bang my head on the floor now.
"It's an act of arrogance and contempt."
This is certainly true, but for some of us it may also be considered an act of attempted murder, or at the very least something along the lines of "enforced negligent homicide".*
To try and take my liberty is to try and take my life. Proceed at your peril.
If anyone would be shocked, shocked at my taking appropriate action to such naked aggression, they can bloody well tap me on the shoulder and have an adult conversation with me about it, without having to involve the Enforcer-Thug Caste at all.
* Apparently I'm into oxymorons today. It seems to go with the territory. Still, I'd rather it make no sense than consider the other possibility--that it's a deliberate act of attrition...
Post a Comment