This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
And yet over the past two years, the only two comments on that page have been by people trying to complain about the study.
When we show there's no correlation (or worse, a negative correlation) between gun ownership and violence across broadly similar demographics, they cry about other countries. "They've got less crime!"
When we show them that that isn't true, either, they talk about different demographics.
These are retarded tail-chasers. There's no point in arguing with them, it's a waste of time.
my favorite of the foreign countries the antis will avail to is austria: it has a phenominally low crime rate, and, oh no, handguns aren't carried anywhere, because all the guns are registered, and locked up at the police stations!
of course, 75-85% of the people are one ethnicity, one language (german, obama. german.), one religion.
immigration is unpopular and heavily restricted. population growth is minimal, and population density is low.
most of the country has a very high standard of living (for europe).
and get this: basic military service is compulsory. that means required by law, for you ivy-league know-it-alls.
so, which product-of-their-environment talking point shall we start with, "liberals?"
demographics?
poverty?
violence doesn't come from a gun. it comes from people dehumanizing each other into collectives with things like... yeah, you guessed it: demographics and economic classes.
they're not real, folks. they don't exist. it's just descriptive terminology. correlation will never be causation, no matter how hard you vote.
3 comments:
And yet over the past two years, the only two comments on that page have been by people trying to complain about the study.
When we show there's no correlation (or worse, a negative correlation) between gun ownership and violence across broadly similar demographics, they cry about other countries. "They've got less crime!"
When we show them that that isn't true, either, they talk about different demographics.
These are retarded tail-chasers. There's no point in arguing with them, it's a waste of time.
my favorite of the foreign countries the antis will avail to is austria: it has a phenominally low crime rate, and, oh no, handguns aren't carried anywhere, because all the guns are registered, and locked up at the police stations!
of course, 75-85% of the people are one ethnicity, one language (german, obama. german.), one religion.
immigration is unpopular and heavily restricted. population growth is minimal, and population density is low.
most of the country has a very high standard of living (for europe).
and get this: basic military service is compulsory. that means required by law, for you ivy-league know-it-alls.
so, which product-of-their-environment talking point shall we start with, "liberals?"
demographics?
poverty?
violence doesn't come from a gun. it comes from people dehumanizing each other into collectives with things like... yeah, you guessed it: demographics and economic classes.
they're not real, folks. they don't exist. it's just descriptive terminology. correlation will never be causation, no matter how hard you vote.
Pay no attention the to man behind the curtain!
Do not confuse people with facts. What the people feel is what matters.
That is what gets the votes.
If we pass this law prohibiting [fill in the blank with whatever],
then we can all feel safer.
Post a Comment