This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I've been following Radley's blog on this case. I predict future textbooks will use this as an example of the Thin Blue Whine. Not entirely fair -- Arpaio is merely a symptom of a larger problem -- but appropriate nonetheless
I hope the anarchists are right in saying that a decent society can a rise from purely free interactions because that is all the egocentrics like Arpaio are going to leave us.
Thanks for the plug, David. It is pretty funny to see the theatrics with which the wolf pack starts nipping at itself--in both cases.
Personally, having lived in Colorado for 15+ years, it is nice to see that Deepest Darkest Denver hasn't infected everyone along the Front Range yet, although those sorry bastards work at it every day. Although the rot is there and growing, I know a lot of good people in that area, and I hope they take heart from the CSU student response.
It's probably also worth mentioning Denver GRE Dan Bidstrup viz the CSU case (Kurt's article points to one of Dan's), and even in general. Dan seems to have a special talent for respectfully tackling some thorny topics that most of us don't get around to, because we are busy shining flashlights at cockroaches. For example, his recent one When is lethal force justified? is a topic worth discussing among gunnies, but most of us are focused so hard on defending the right to even have this choice that we tend to skip over any of the metaphysics that treat the choice itself. Dan seems to do that well.
"I hope the anarchists are right in saying that a decent society can a rise from purely free interactions because that is all the egocentrics like Arpaio are going to leave us."
What outcome of a failed experiment in anarchy are you afraid of? That some regional warlord will steal all the factories and enslave the populace? That's what you have right now, it was produced by the system you champion! Your mind is SO OWNED by the commies. You can't even IMAGINE liberty, much less OBSERVE FACTS and REASON about achieving it. You're stuck in a commie fantasy of prosperity without work and safety without discipline. Your wish for an 'elder statesmen to lead a limited constitutional republic' is identical to the so-called other side's "socialism would work if only the right people were in charge". You're commies, and you will remain commies until you renounce voting. Perhaps it would be fitting that you die of malnutrition, exposure and disease after you demand a repeat of the Soviet Union. Your failure to learn is definitely impacting my empathy.
3 comments:
I've been following Radley's blog on this case. I predict future textbooks will use this as an example of the Thin Blue Whine. Not entirely fair -- Arpaio is merely a symptom of a larger problem -- but appropriate nonetheless
I hope the anarchists are right in saying that a decent society can a rise from purely free interactions because that is all the egocentrics like Arpaio are going to leave us.
Thanks for the plug, David. It is pretty funny to see the theatrics with which the wolf pack starts nipping at itself--in both cases.
Personally, having lived in Colorado for 15+ years, it is nice to see that Deepest Darkest Denver hasn't infected everyone along the Front Range yet, although those sorry bastards work at it every day. Although the rot is there and growing, I know a lot of good people in that area, and I hope they take heart from the CSU student response.
It's probably also worth mentioning Denver GRE Dan Bidstrup viz the CSU case (Kurt's article points to one of Dan's), and even in general. Dan seems to have a special talent for respectfully tackling some thorny topics that most of us don't get around to, because we are busy shining flashlights at cockroaches. For example, his recent one When is lethal force justified? is a topic worth discussing among gunnies, but most of us are focused so hard on defending the right to even have this choice that we tend to skip over any of the metaphysics that treat the choice itself. Dan seems to do that well.
"I hope the anarchists are right in saying that a decent society can a rise from purely free interactions because that is all the egocentrics like Arpaio are going to leave us."
What outcome of a failed experiment in anarchy are you afraid of? That some regional warlord will steal all the factories and enslave the populace? That's what you have right now, it was produced by the system you champion! Your mind is SO OWNED by the commies. You can't even IMAGINE liberty, much less OBSERVE FACTS and REASON about achieving it. You're stuck in a commie fantasy of prosperity without work and safety without discipline. Your wish for an 'elder statesmen to lead a limited constitutional republic' is identical to the so-called other side's "socialism would work if only the right people were in charge". You're commies, and you will remain commies until you renounce voting. Perhaps it would be fitting that you die of malnutrition, exposure and disease after you demand a repeat of the Soviet Union. Your failure to learn is definitely impacting my empathy.
Post a Comment