That seems a pretty dangerous and irresponsible thing to do to people who want to be left alone. [More]This latest crap from this little dictator warranted a second Gun Rights Examiner column.
There's a solution of sorts in here, but I doubt anyone will try it.
Share the link?
3 comments:
David, you're closer to the industry than I am so I'm perfectly prepared to be proven wrong. But my gut says you're asking for virtue where there is none to be found.
The only example I know of where this happened was Barrett, which you mentioned, but which as far as I know didn't have any substantial contracts with the state of California anyway. If you ask Remington, or Winchester, or S&W or Colt or - hell - any of them to make a choice between the "civilian" market or military/LEO, my gut says they'd walk away from the first without a backward glance. The bottom line is god, and the margins are just too delicious when you sell to governments.
Please. Tell me I'm wrong.
Post a Comment