Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Restoration, not Revolution

Then - and only at this point - what must take place is a restoration of Constitutional law and order. [More
Or as Mike says, "No Fort Sumters."

The true "American Revolution" wasn't the War of the Rebellion anyway.

5 comments:

JD(not the one with the picture) said...

As I say to Libertarians who promote the non-aggression principle, I will decide for myself what constitutes "aggression".

Crotalus said...

The real American Revolution was the new government and Constitution, that's true. But we still had to fight the War of the Rebellion to secure that Revolution.

Alan said...

That's one of the things I like about how Project Appleseed teaches the history, they make it clear that the American Revolution ran for about ten years before the American Revolutionary War began.

Pat H. said...

There is no "restoration" to be had.

I've asked the question before to so-called Constitutional Restorationists, they've yet to answer me.

Exactly point is it to which you'd restore?

1960?
1913?
1860?

How about 1800?

The point is that there isn't a point at which you'd choose, that's because the Constitution is, in fact, functioning exactly as originally intended.

We southern nationalists want no part in any restoration, we want no part in any forced association with those running the Yankee Empire.

So, as far as we're concerned, this idea is dead, if it were ever alive in the first place.

David Codrea said...

Pat H, I totally support "you Southern nationalists" establishing whatever freedom system works best for you. If you secede, I won't try to stop you and may even support it.

By the same token, if that includes reinstituting human slavery, I totally support the victims obtaining a freedom system that works for them.

Fair?