This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I just left this comment on the site to which you linked.:
"ThomasDanielFrain mike newkirk • a few seconds ago − Kinda weak on math, aren't they? IF all those felons" turn themselves in and plead guilty, they'll need to lock up 322,000 people at a cost of about $100 a day per inmate, or $32,200,000 per day.
That adds up to about $12BILLION per year, or about 5% of the state's gross product. Factor in the costs of the new prisons that will need to be built ad the new correctional staff that will be needed, and it's ever more absurd.
Factor in also the loss of productivity of the new inmates, the costs of supporting their families on welfare, and the inevitable lawsuits over the conditions of incarceration, and Connecticut will go to hell in a hurry.
Cowboy, you're spot on, unless.... It could be a simpler plan. Arrests and the subsequent defense are a boon to the trial lawyers and the court system as a whole. Some who choose trial may win, at a cost. Some won't, at a cost. Many more will opt for a plea bargain. The result doesn't necessarily mean jail time. For sure it means a financial boon for them, the results are very destructive for those caught up in the system. The financial strain it causes, the anxiety, and the fact those convicted or plea bargained out will have convictions hanging over their heads for life. Mug shots are linked to facial recognition software everywhere these days. Coupled with black box license plate scanners and on board computers in cop cars. Unless you have a violent history they do not need to put you in jail...You'll be living like you were any way!! PTSD as a parting gift when they are done with you... Win Win for them
2 comments:
I just left this comment on the site to which you linked.:
"ThomasDanielFrain mike newkirk • a few seconds ago −
Kinda weak on math, aren't they? IF all those felons" turn themselves in and plead guilty, they'll need to lock up 322,000 people at a cost of about $100 a day per inmate, or $32,200,000 per day.
That adds up to about $12BILLION per year, or about 5% of the state's gross product. Factor in the costs of the new prisons that will need to be built ad the new correctional staff that will be needed, and it's ever more absurd.
Factor in also the loss of productivity of the new inmates, the costs of supporting their families on welfare, and the inevitable lawsuits over the conditions of incarceration, and Connecticut will go to hell in a hurry.
It's not gonna work"
Cowboy,
you're spot on, unless....
It could be a simpler plan.
Arrests and the subsequent defense are a boon to the trial lawyers and the court system as a whole. Some who choose trial may win, at a cost. Some won't, at a cost. Many more will opt for a plea bargain.
The result doesn't necessarily mean jail time. For sure it means a financial boon for them, the results are very destructive for those caught up in the system. The financial strain it causes, the anxiety, and the fact those convicted or plea bargained out will have convictions hanging over their heads for life. Mug shots are linked to facial recognition software everywhere these days. Coupled with black box license plate scanners and on board computers in cop cars. Unless you have a violent history they do not need to put you in jail...You'll be living like you were any way!!
PTSD as a parting gift when they are done with you...
Win Win for them
Post a Comment