Similarly, licensing is permitted under the Second Amendment...[More]
So that must be why it says "shall not be infringed"!
And "permitted" by whom?
As for people who have proven they can't be trusted with a gun...
[Via Michael G]
Friday, November 20, 2020
A Professor in Constitutional Law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I believe this goes here?
Awaiting moderation
DDS commented on "A California Victory?"
34 mins ago
How is he any different than former Sen. John Kerry (D-MA): "I believe strongly in the Second Amendment. I believe in the right to bear arms as it has been interpreted in our country." Note carefully the second half of the second sentence. Rather than protect an inherent right to keep and bear arms, that wording would leave it open to ban everything but single shot .22 cal. "Gallery guns". The founders were extremely careful to say exactly what they wanted to say, sometimes debating for days the inclusion or deletion of a word or phrase. When they wrote, passed, and ratified the Second Amendment, "shall not be infringed" meant exactly that.
Post a Comment