In her ruling, Kagan wrote that lawful permanent residency requires "admission" into the U.S., which the court defined as “the lawful entry of the alien into the United States after inspection and authorization by an immigration officer.” [More]
So does that make the catch-and-release of the multitudes apprehended and assigned future court dates and/or sent to tax-funded accommodations "lawful entries"? What kind of "public assistance" are those like the plaintiff eligible for? He's been here since '97. Got any "Dreamers" or "birthright citizens" with him? And how many millions like him intend to bypass the courts altogether?
Good thing this has nothing to do with that "single issue." Just ask any "gun rights" group.
No comments:
Post a Comment