Thursday, May 01, 2008

Microinfringing in Nassau

Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice is urging the NYS Senate to pass legislation requiring semiautomatic pistols manufactured or delivered to any licensed dealer in this state to be capable of microstamping ammunition.

...The bill, A9819A, was sponsored by Assemblywoman Michelle Schimel of Great Neck, cosponsored by Assemblymen Tom McKevitt of Garden City and Joseph Saladino of Massapequa.
Well doesn't it just figure: A Janet Reno protégé using her "official" power to run interference for a radical schlemiel board member of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence.

Yeah, I'll be letting Elena CeauÅŸescu clones define my rights real quick. Maybe we can negotiate a compromise with them...

Everybody realizes the radical feminist left hates men, right? And yeah, I mean to include "Republicans" McKevitt and Saladino.

[Via cycjec]

Statement of Cavalry Arms

From Shawn Nealon
Cavalry Arms Corp:

For those of you sending out moral support, we very much appreciate it. This is what our 3 different Attorneys all agreed is safe to post....

"For many years Cavalry Arms Corporation (“Cavalry”) has strived to manufacture and sell quality firearms to the public. We have always strived to put our experience from the field into making quality products that the average shooter can afford, while still bringing innovations to the industry. We are dedicated to providing the best possible products and customer service to the firearms market.

On February 27, 2008, agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives executed a federal search warrant on the business premises of Cavalry and on the private residence of its CEO, Shawn Nealon. We have immediately engaged legal counsel to resolve this matter with the federal government. Cavalry is confident that all it conduct has been lawful in carrying out its business activities. The Government has yet to share with the company details of the investigation or the cause precipitating the search warrant. Cavalry is cooperating with the federal investigation. To date no accusations of wrongdoing have been filed against Cavalry or any of its employees regarding alleged illegal activity.

While we are waiting for a resolution to this situation, Cavalry Arms will remain open for business and continue firearms operations under its Manufacturer’s FFL. Unfortunately, the federal government seized business files, computers, and inventory from Cavalry during the execution of the search warrant. As a result, Cavalry has been forced to reconstitute its resources, and we expect to be fully operational in the near future. In the meantime, we still carry firearm parts and emergency medical products for sale. We appreciate your patience, and we thank everyone who has shown us support during this turbulent time."

5/2 UPDATE: Click here to see assets seized as posted in The Wall Street Journal.

This Day in History: May 1

The Committee of Sixty was replaced by a more representative Committee of One Hundred on May 1, 1775. By May 4, the city had four companies of volunteers. On May 15, the Continental Congress order the construction of a fort at Kings Bridge, the construction of batteries in the Highlands, and the arming and training of a militia.

The Committee of One Hundred was not for independence, but was instead opposed to Britain's laws which they considered unjust. The committee wrote to Governor Cadwallader Colden in May, 1775 "that though they are arming with the greatest diligence and industry; it is not with design to oppose, but to strengthen government in the due exercise of constitutional authority". In May, all inhabitants were asked to sign a Association. Anyone who refused to sign were to be called "enemies of this country". Some of the Loyalists were tarred and feathered. The committee disarmed all loyalists within its jurisdiction. The Committee of One Hundred was officially replaced by the New York Provincial Congress which first convened on May 23, 1775, but the committee continued to meet for a while.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

We're the Onl...zzzzzzzzzzz

When you call 911, you expect help immediately. Lisa, a Memphis resident, got anything but...

The line goes silent. As Lisa continues to explain her situation, the dispatcher does not respond - not for just 15 or 30 seconds, but for one full minute.

Then, sounds of snoring can be heard on the line.
Because we're "The Only Ones" in this room professional enough to use this phone, y'see...

[Via MacEntyre]

Pampering Tyranny

You can help babies in need have a brighter tomorrow! With every specially marked pack of Pampers that you purchase, Pampers will donate the cost of one vaccine to help UNICEF protect a woman and her newborns against tetanus*...

Sounds like a humane program. Why the asterisk? How much of the nickel goes directly into vaccines, or does it go directly into a general fund for Unicef to use as it sees fit? And even if it all bought shots, would it free up resources for:

...financing terrorism?

...funding global gun control?

...partnering with our old friends at IANSA?

Ultimately, the only secular solutions to the world's woes will be provided by increasing Liberty, not by giving the globalist commissars more leverage for making people depend on them. Don't fall for the DSH*. As worthy as the goal may seem, the true objective smells worse than a landfill of disposed Pampers.

*Substitute "Diaper"

Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood

"The bottom line is that this protest is not going to change anything," said Jack Rogers, director of public safety at OSU. "The Oregon administrative rule overrides any provision for concealed weapons, and it is very unlikely that the Oregon University System will yield to any change on this subject."...

Rogers, however, doesn't believe that an average gun owner would know how to use deadly force properly in an extreme situation.

"We in law enforcement have gone through an extreme amount of firearms training," Rogers said. "We're the ones who are the professionals."

He also said that students who carry concealed weapons may not be knowledgeable enough to determine when to use deadly force and when to restrain. Rogers believes that firearms in a college environment have to be controlled.

"The bottom line is that we have well-trained and well-prepared staff here who know what the training is all about," Rogers said.

"[The use of deadly force] doesn't come lightly; it takes a tremendous amount of training to use deadly force."

Right.

This coming from the guy whose best advice is run or hide. If you can. He won't tell you to pray if you can't, because OSU is a public institution, and there's that "wall of separation" (that somehow doesn't keep the evil out)...

By your logic, Jack, all 48 states that have successfully implemented some form of concealed carry provisions must rescind them because--why is that again? Oh, yes, you're (and we knew this was coming) "The Only Ones."

Tell me something, Jack (your middle name wouldn't happen to be "Boot," would it?): If you're not an outright fraud, that is, if you truly believe that line of utter crap you just spouted to The Barometer, wouldn't such incompetence wielded by someone in authority amount to criminal negligence? Is not, in fact, calling someone who uses force to endanger other humans a "director of public safety" a perverse Orwellian oxymoron?

Where do we find the mentality that, with a straight face asserts evil little local edicts "override" unalienable natural rights? And where do we find the mentality that believes him?

[Via Cogito Ergo Geek]

Lux Lucre's Flash Page

Bill St. Clair added a comment to yesterday's "Flash to Freedom" post:
The Philosophy of Liberty flash animation is a creation of the late Lux Lucre. I snarfed his entire Flash animation directory right after he died to ensure that it wouldn't be lost. It includes The Philosophy of Liberty in English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese, L. Neil Smith's "The Atlanta Declaration" in English, Spanish, French, German, and Japanese, a rendition of the Zero Aggression Principle, and a few others.

Check it out at billstclair.com/luxlucre (the "Bill of Rights animation was missing at his site when I sampled it).

We're the Only Ones Cited Enough

A CITIZEN who watched a cop illegally park, then walk into a Chinese restaurant to wait for his food, has issued the officer a series of citizen-initiated parking violations.
Don't you just love the "Only One" rationale?
"If someone broke into your house, would you rather have the police be able to park in front of your house or have to park three blocks away and walk there?"
There was no crime emergency, just personal convenience, and if there had been a break-in, you would be parking at the scene. We all know that and it isn't even a rational argument. But isn't it interesting, how your immediate reaction is to use a deceptive ploy to cover your tracks?

It makes me wonder what other shortcuts you have conditioned yourself to employ to avoid accountability for willful abuses of power. And it makes me wonder if that corruption is isolated or institutionalized in your department.

What I don't wonder about is the character of someone who abuses the privileges of delegated authority and then tries to weasel out of the consequences.

Good for Mr. Bryan. And shame on you, Chad Stensgaard.

[Via Plug Nickel Times]

Compare and Contrast

Here are two stories out of Tennessee handled two different ways:

Defenseless
A 19-year-old clerk was killed Monday night after two men robbed the gas station where he worked, shot him and left him for dead in the middle of the street outside, Metro police said.
Armed
A would-be robber at an Inglewood liquor store was shot and killed Saturday night after a customer opened fire, Metro police said.
Not that it would do any good to show this to an anti-defense zealot--they'd just seize on what could have happened, as opposed to what did.

[Via Blackshirt]

Report from the Front Lines

[Because this involves certain disclosures, the Author chooses to remain anonymous.--DC]

I just returned from the gun store and boy was it depressing. This is my observation from the front lines;

I have been a gun BUYER / collector for +/- 33 years. I purchased my first (legal) gun at 10:05 am on the morning of my 18th birthday. I was lined up at the door before the store opened. Since that day, I buy guns like people try to max out their IRA's.

Since January 2000 when the kalifornia "one a month" law took effect I took that as a minimum requirement and I have purchased in excess of a gun a month, every month for the last 100 months.

What do I see after 30 + years? Eight out of the ten gun stores I have regularly shopped at are closed, gone, out of business. The two that are left are playing to a captive audience and they treat their customers as if they have come to the DMV.

There are no kids in the store(s). It is no wonder the gun business is dying.

I was in a gun store this afternoon to pick up a couple of guns and there must have been in excess of a dozen people in the store. One of the "clerks" called out "who's picking up a gun?" and I was the only person to raise my hand out of the throng - Everyone there was a tire kicker or time waster. No one (apparently) was there to spend money.

I have lamented before that most people that frequent gun stores are time wasters. Sitting at the counter shooting the breeze, handling stuff, friends of the owner hanging out, wanna be "men" who don't buy guns because their wives won't allow one in the house but they want to hold one. This is what a gun store has become.

I used to spend a lot of time in gun stores when I was younger. I don't hang out much in the gun stores anymore - although I do spend money. I come in before they open, do the insidious stack of paperwork and leave before they open or I come in, get business done and leave but if there is one thing I have never seen in any gun store FOREVER it is the majority of the crowd spending money.

When I was a kid, the gun store was the mens club. Now, the decline is painful to watch. With the coming micro stamping it is possible that the only companies selling guns in kalifornia will be S & W and Ruger and the gun business will be unsustainable. Add to that the proposed ammo licensing and what ever other crap becomes fashionable. In my view we are watching the last 10 years of the firearms business in kalifornia. (Unless the result of Heller is to tell the state to F*** OFF - but I don't think that is likely)

I would like to see S & W and Ruger and others take the principled stand that Ronnie Barrett took and refuse to sell guns, ammunition and replacement parts to any kalifornia agency or officer because barring that, the gun business in kalifornia will be LEO centered if not exclusive and there will be no private gun business. But I'm not holding my breath.

Combine this move toward restrictive legislation and dealers embracing (bending over for) the state with a lack of product diversity or availability and people not spending money in the stores and there is no gun business in kalifornia.

Therapeutic Thuggery

A new law being pushed in Canada by Big Pharma seeks to outlaw up to 60 percent of natural health products currently sold in Canada, even while
criminalizing parents who give herbs or supplements to their children.


I'm not a big proponent of herbs, supplements, vitamins, colloidal minerals, homeopathy, or anything that relies on anecdotes and testimonials over clinical studies, etc., but then again, my approval isn't necessary, is it?

Personally, I try to eat right and within reason, do some exertion activity each day, and then figure we're all gonna die of something...

I don't mean to conduct that debate here.

Bottom line: who owns your body?

This is the logical extension of the War on Drugs, which provides the template for the War on Guns, which is a targeted objective in the greater War on Freedom. As we see, it's happening in Canada, it's happening in Europe, and it's happening here.

And while the cover story is one of enlightenment, protection and health, we all know that somewhere at the end of the thread we'll find money and power and control trumping self determination.

[Via DONE! SEO]

This Day in History: April 30

...I assure myself that whilst you carefully avoid every alteration which might endanger the benefits of an united and effective government, or which ought to await the future lessons of experience, a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony will sufficiently influence your deliberations on the question how far the former can be impregnably fortified or the latter be safely and advantageously promoted.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

A Hunter and Gun Owner

The gun industry should set its sights on a different target: certification.

It should develop and adopt a private licensing and certification program fashioned on the highly successful scuba diving industry model to provide safety, legal, and marksmanship training to all gun owners and users.
S'cuse me?

We have it. From many sources.
No diver may fill their tanks or take part in recreational or professional diving trips without first obtaining a certification card from one of these private organizations.

Oh, I see.

No. I don't consent to be ruled by a "private" group, either. But I see you've managed to start a subversive new meme. If nothing else, it ought to make things harder for "those people," at least the ones in poorer, more dangerous communities who try to live by the rules.

And, it'll no doubt discourage many "fence sitters" from buying guns and ammo--possibly people who could have saved their lives--say--you never did say how many deaths you'd find acceptable with your little experiment here, because every benefit does have costs, you know.

I'm assuming you also have plans for those of us who own some of the 200 million guns already in circulation? And you can't forget those who reload.

Hey, have you figured out the economic impact to gun dealers? You may end up shutting more of them down than BATFU!

Y'know what, Mr. Media Conglomerate Mucky-Muck? What if somebody thinks we ought to treat the First Amendment the way you want to treat the Second, and make sure every Beckett subscriber/magazine purchaser has to undergo private certification before they can buy your trivial bread-and-circuses products?

Anything else, "hunter and gun owner" Peter A. Gudmundsson?

"Helping to Reduce Gun Violence"

The technology alerts law enforcement officials to the location of gunfire within seconds with pinpoint accuracy, helping to reduce gun violence.
How? The shots have already happened. By going back in time?

We've talked about this before.

Let's do an experiment.

BANG BANG BANG

Now imagine how far away you could be in the two minutes "average time" Newark says it takes them to respond. And why on earth would we not believe a Newark police official?

"Currently ShotSpotter is deployed in more than 29 major U.S. cities," we are told.

Anyone got numbers to demonstrate a reduction in "gun violence" attributable to the system?

The word "fraud" comes to mind. But I guess when you're part of the problem, there's nothing to do but keep the con game going as long as you can find suckers to fall for it.

Flash to Freedom

Interesting flash movie on Liberty from ISIL.

[Via Ron W]

Global Profiling System

Honda has developed a crime rate detecting GPS that will search through local police records to alert drivers in real-time if they ever happen to drive by high crime areas...

Look for it to violate US anti-discrimination laws for only going off in certain demographic areas. I can imagine some places where you'd have to turn the damn thing off because it wouldn't shut up.

Just think though--once we all get our Real ID chip implants, and once all our guns are registered in a central database, and once all our guns are made "smart"--replete with "Only One"-controlled shutoff switches--what a wonderful world it will be!

GUN OWNER WARNING! GUN OWNER WARNING!

Sounds like "probable cause" to me...

A Two-Edged Sword

Two students attending Eagan and Apple Valley high schools were expelled last week after buying souvenir swords during a spring break choir trip in the United Kingdom.
So--do you think the outraged parents will organize and oust the board members? Good luck--most are controlled by the teachers' unions, and most parents don't care enough to get involved.

This is the kind of stuff that should give us pause when pointing out how far places like the UK have degenerated. We have no shortage of control freaks and people who won't stand up to them here.

[Via Jeffersonian]

The Oregon Trail

Flores said "Many of these people get CHL's because they are worried about their safety, whether it’s from a stalker, a case of domestic violence, or some other threat. Making their names, addresses and other records public might jeopardize their security.”

Good for Rep. Flores. I do wonder if legislation--assuming it passes--will override a judgment awarded under existing law: ex post facto 'n all that.

I still like this plan.

Here's my advice to snoops with a burning desire to know who has a gun:

Assume we all do. Conduct yourself accordingly and there shouldn't be any problems.

And by "snoops," I also mean the ones originally intended to secure the blessings of liberty. Why anyone thinks it's any of their business is beyond me, and this situation is only possible because gun owners made a special effort to put themselves on a list--one government controls and can access any time they want.

[Via Jeffersonian]

Playing the Percentages

With one gun shop in Madison, another on the way in Franklin and his own custom gun manufacturing business, Uselton says he’s proudly “150 percent behind the Second Amendment.”

Uselton is especially fond of the phrasing at the end of the amendment, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

...But there’s one issue where Uselton breaks the party line and that’s on the topic of perceived lackadaisical laws surrounding sales at gun shows.
Whenever I hear anyone claim more than 100%, I think about this, particularly 103%.

And here's a guy who scores 118%:

“The place is crawling with ATF and TBI agents,” Goodman said. “At my shows, I’ve got a booth for the ATF...
While this fellow here has a better grip on the top number possible, you have to wonder if he understands what the upper limit really means:

Santos said while he is "100 percent behind the Second Amendment," he also supports the new measure.
[Via Charelton Hest]
[Finger on trigger observation thanks to Theaton]

This Day in History: April 29

All the ministerial intelligence concerning us is false. We are a united, resolved people, are, or quickly shall be, well armed and disciplined; our smith’s and powder-mills are at work day and night; our supplies from foreign parts continually arriving. Good officers, that is, well-experienced ones, we shall soon have, and the navy of Great Britain cannot stop our whole trade. our towns are but brick and stone, and mortar and wood. They, perhaps, may be destroyed. They are only the hairs of our heads. If sheared evere so close, they will grow again. We compare them not with our rights and liberties. We worship as our fathers worshipped, not idols which our hands have made.