This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
When will we demand with a loud and clear voice, at least at the level we had for the concealed carry in National Parks, to remove the sporting purpose from the '68n GCA?
Telescoping stocks are a good thing because they allow a shotgun (or any other rifle for that matter) to fit the different people in a household for more accurate aiming. The part about, "sporting" for firearms being part of the law in which to regulate firearms is pure hogwash. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with "sporting" and the proof of that is, the Kentucky Rifle. The Kentucky Rifle was an assault rifle in its day and was a huge part of winning the war against the English. The founders never dreamed of putting the Second Amendment together to protect the "sporting" side of firearms. The truth of this is, the shotgun advancements in performance is power in the hands of citizens, which is what the Second Amendment was all about. Why am I telling you folks this is related to morning coffee in excessive amounts.
7 comments:
I think I just threw up a little in my mouth.
I notice the idiots misspelled "importability" in the url. Their incompetence rivals the fictional "Wonker Weiners" (Far Side cartoon).
The NASDAP sporting purpose surfaces once again.
When will we demand with a loud and clear voice, at least at the level we had for the concealed carry in National Parks, to remove the sporting purpose from the '68n GCA?
This is far more important.
That "infringement" reads like "denial of civil right under color of law".
Anyone at ATF take an oath to "protect and defend against domestic enemies"? ATF should be arresting itself.
"Sporting purpose" bites us in the ass again. Plinking -- assassinating tin cans -- "is not a sport."
Some people say shooting paper targets isn't a sport either, but murderer training.
Let them have their word-weasel fun while they can. Over soon.
Telescoping stocks are a good thing because they allow a shotgun (or any other rifle for that matter) to fit the different people in a household for more accurate aiming.
The part about, "sporting" for firearms being part of the law in which to regulate firearms is pure hogwash. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with "sporting" and the proof of that is, the Kentucky Rifle. The Kentucky Rifle was an assault rifle in its day and was a huge part of winning the war against the English. The founders never dreamed of putting the Second Amendment together to protect the "sporting" side of firearms.
The truth of this is, the shotgun advancements in performance is power in the hands of citizens, which is what the Second Amendment was all about.
Why am I telling you folks this is related to morning coffee in excessive amounts.
I note a Saiga .410 pictured in the report as well as what appears to be a MD-20 magazine for the Saiga-12.
Reading through the mind-numbing twaddle in the PDF (this is sporting enough, that is not sporting enough, too bulky, measure this way) is angering.
Not to even start with SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Morons.
(Swinging by the mdarms.com site and the agparms.com sites show both manufacturers to be out of stock of magazines. Heh.)
Post a Comment