The Fix is In

Administration officials praised the ruling. [More]

Of course they did.

By the way, calling Larry Klayman a "gadfly": That's some objective reporting.

As for appealing to the Supreme Court, all they have to do is not hear the case.

There is one other "legal" option before deciding all judicial doors have been barred shut:

Precedent has already been set for a federal judge to issue an injunction against implementation of executive amnesty, albeit through a different route.

Back before Congress allowed guns in national parks due to a rider on a credit card bill, a move by the Bush administration though its Interior Department was halted by an injunction from a federal judge siding with a Brady Campaign complaint and ruling that no environmental impact study had been conducted as required by law.

Now that it appears the administration's amnesty action was conducted under DHS memorandum, the parallels are even more marked, minimizing potential executive action immunities. It would seem a lawsuit based on the same grounds filed in a carefully selected jurisdiction would have precedent to achieve the same results.

Yeah, I know, they'd just find a way to weasel out of that as well.  That's because the fix is in and those intent on fundamentally transforming are confident that any opposition will be small and scattered.

Good thing this has nothing to do with that "single issue."