In a legitimate government, the Russian dossier would have been examined, quickly discredited and dropped. The statements concerning Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin would have been examined and put into effect, either shelving the need for a vaccine, or working alongside its development, preventing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. The suspicion of election fraud would have been recognized, willingly investigated and probably a new election would have been conducted, all before January 20, or soon after. [More]
"Illegitimate" is such a hateful word. "Undelegated" sounds much less judgmental, don't you think?
What? You don't?
Me neither, but if you call them "usurpers" they'll cancel you as an "anti-government extremist" a Nazi fascist, and a racist and hater -- one who deserves to be exterminated to boot.
I will offer one question: Where does the Constitution authorize "the military to ... conduct an emergency election..."?
1 comment:
"The first charge of the newly elected government must be to investigate previous acts of treason through the normal, civilian means to restore faith in the rule of law that has so long been absent or partisan in nature."
A truly flawed recommendation.
What if the "original fraud" was earlier than the Russian dossier... say, a phony birth certificate? How do we unwind that far?
And trusting in a government investigation is truly being fooled twice. Even the most "rigorous" investigations are corrupt. Think Warren Commission.
Finally, expecting "the military" to be our deus ex machina is not only unAmerican, but futile. It's now controlled by the same sick woke f*s as every other part of government.
There is no governing our way out of this mess. No part of the government can be trusted to contribute to a trustworthy solution.
Post a Comment