McCarthy has a challenge from the right, and Cheney's statement should help McCarthy with some of the hardliners, in part by giving them conservative cover to support him. [More]Only if they're really phony establishment tools being deliberately indifferent to this and this.
Diller has a long track record contributing to Democratic candidates. In the 2008 election he contributed to numerous Democratic candidates including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. But he also gave money to Republican presidential candidate John McCain...Gosh, you'd almost think Carroll Quigley was on to something...
Right-wing rage monkey Michelle Malkin... [More]You forgot the "tailless" modifier, Salon.
A NEW CONSTITUTION OR THE BULLET [More]Give me a second to consult with Mr. Benny...
In other words, yes, we really do want to take your guns. Maybe not all of them. But a lot of them. [More]That's pretty ambitious, Josh. Why not start small and see how it works out, plus claim an exclusive for your readers?
Of course he doesn’t know. You know why he doesn’t know? Because he is not, and has never been in his son’s life. He’s a complete failure as a father, he should be embarrassed to even show his face in public. He’s the problem here. [More]Hear, Hear!
Assuming the “intelligence” will be ultimately exploitable to build cases involving U.S. citizens, what assurances are there that it will be gained in accordance with individual protections mandated in the Bill of Rights? Not to cast aspersions on member cities like Beirut, but just what “best practices” are acceptable, and will the representatives of our people, that would be the Congress, have unfettered oversight of the process? What further protections will there be against foreign law influencing decisions required to comport with “the supreme Law of the Land,” something more than one “progressive” Supreme Court Justice has expressed an interest in considering flexible? [More]And on top of all that, they've deliberately anonymously registered their website.
Someone in Chicago has been shot every 2.84 hours this year for a total of 2,349 shootings during the period of January 1, 2015 to October 6, 2015, according to crime stats published by the Chicago Tribune. [More]Those are some stats. They kind of speak volumes about "gun control," don't they?
Oath Keepers call for Waffle House boycott [More]No it didn't. I included an unequivocal statement with a link for a purpose. You'd think if someone was going to presume to write about a subject with anything approaching understanding what he's reading, he'd, at a minimum, you know, click on it...
MILM is an acronym for “mother I’d like to meet,” which is apparently a slightly less sexualized “MILF” reference to the anti-gun group Moms Demand Action — which Codrea frequently targets with complaints.No it's not.
Codrea dismissed the claim as after-the-fact damage control.Did I? I thought I made a point of specifically calling it "a diversion to mask discrimination against all gun owners."
The footage, posted on social media, begins with a Los Angeles police officer getting out of his patrol car, followed by a shot of a handgun held by the person shooting the video. That individual was recording the video from inside a car parked behind the officer. [More]The default assumption is that this is a manifestation of hatred and violence, as opposed to a demonstration that people who do the same thing every day to citizens are not the "Only Ones" capable of following and recording someone while armed. In terms of creating a bigger divide, historically, LAPD has proven more than capable of doing that all by their own selves.
Using a 5,200 person telephoneDavid T. Hardy found a study from 1997.surgery[survey-- see comment by Ed], authors conclude that annually about 1.9 million people draw a gun during a home intrusion, but don't actually see the intruder, another 503,000 draw a gun and do see the intruder and (not surprisingly) 497,000 report the intruder fled in response to the gun. [More]
[E]very jab you get in at your fellow establishmentarians like Marco Rubio is going to be used against them by the left. [More]Says the leftist, who wants to guarantee that at least there will be a "pathway to citizenship" Republican if the Democrats implode. Or are we supposed to believe he really cares and is just trying to be helpful?
gratuitous [makes his anti-gun point, trying to sound all reasonable and adult]Sho Rembo [makes his pro-gun counterpoint]gratuitous: F*!# off, @$$hole. Nobody asked you.
A former sheriff and his chief deputy were unaware of an illicit trade in machine guns operating secretly in their department, according to testimony in a federal gun running trial. [More]"Barn, did you know any of this was goin' on?"
The Little Sisters of the Poor is an international Catholic institute that takes care of the elderly. The Sisters consider it a sin to provide their employees health coverage for contraceptives (including drugs classified by the FDA as abortion-inducing) as required under Obamacare, and want the same kind of exemption given to churches. [More]Has the administration checked to make sure these guys are compliant?
The final statement in the resolution on gun violence states, “reflecting the traditional role of The United Methodist Church that has been one of safety and sanctuary, every United Methodist Church is officially declared a weapon-free zone.” [More]Inviting martyrdom to make a point?
HUNTER ESCAPES ATTACK BY SHOVING ARM DOWN BEAR'S THROAT [More]Sometimes you can't retreat from, or go around, over or under that which will destroy you. Sometimes, if you are to survive, the only way out is to go through.
Should Juanita Broaddrick have had a gun to defend herself from rape? Is she a liar? Yes or No?Basically, Clinton is dictating the terms of surrender to American gun owners and presuming they will just roll over and take it, and that she will have the power to go door-to-door and enforce her demands when a critical mass tells her to go pound sand. If a growing “I will not comply” movement has made an unenforceable dilemma for issuers of edicts in Connecticut, New York, and elsewhere, trying to impose the same thing that doesn’t work locally on a national scale seems the definition of insanity writ large. [More]
Combat Vets Destroy the NRA’s Heroic Gunslinger Fantasy [More]That presupposes such fantasies exist outside the sick minds of juveniles and anti-gun "progressives"-- but I repeat myself. It also presumes to have destroyed something other than the credibility of National Socialist Review with anyone capable of independent thought. Right off the bat, anti-gun male Joshua Holland reveals he's only interested in disparaging better men who don't share in his contemptible self-imposed helplessness.
Obama peddles gun control fable [More]Lies are easy to get people to swallow if you can hide relevant considerations that refute them. The important thing to remember is they are lies, the withholding of inconvenient facts is intentional, and the reason a lie is being told in the first place is because the person telling it wants to commit as fraud on those he is telling it to.
Obviously, if a manufacturer is out there cranking out poorly designed and constructed junk that blows up in your hand or fails to perform when you need it, no one wants to give the guy a pass, including (and especially) gun rights advocates. Similarly, if a car maker puts a model on the streets that bursts into flames as the steering wheel locks and the brakes fail, you’re not going to find a coalition of motorists clamoring to absolve them of all responsibility. But people would righteously object to holding automakers responsible for criminal abuses. If someone steals your car and plows into a school bus, who in their right mind would demand going after the manufacturer’s or the dealer’s deep pockets? What about if someone gets liquored up and ends up smashing into oncoming traffic or running over pedestrians? Should we start bankrupting shareholders and frog-marching CEOs? [More]My latest GUNS Magazine "Rights Watch" column is now online.
Mrs. Clinton plans to push for imposing tighter gun-purchase background checks and banning certain military-style weapons, among other items. [More]Gotta make the world safe for that rapist "husband" of hers...
The organization known as Oath Keepers is demanding a “marketplace response” to Waffle House’s no-gun policy. [More]No, I made it unmistakeably clear, emphasizing the point with a link to my "Who Speaks for Oath Keepers?" piece, that I was, and I quote:
...speaking for myself...And I didn't "demand" -- I simply stated my position, gave my reasons, shared my response and said "I encourage..." and "I hope..." others would follow suit. If individuals in comments happen to agree with me, that's their right and their choice.
The thing about this issue is at it’s heart, it’s not about guns at all. It is whether or not businesses have the right to deny service to those they choose to.No, because the piece he's featuring never claimed otherwise. The issue is, at its heart, about not doing business with people who impose unacceptable and offensive conditions. If Waffle House or other entities won't offer a guarantee to back their actions, I see no reason to place myself under their imposed conditions.
Secret Service Targeting of Chaffetz Alarms Lawmakers [More]If they dare do this to the head of Oversight, what more would this lawless government dare do to you and me?
Of 170 held after Waco biker shooting, all are now out of jail, with none charged in killings [More]Meanwhile, Grassley's staffers continue to ignore their promise.
 |
| Going my way...? |
Americans will be vastly outnumbered by mass immigration unless Congress hits the “pause” button on issuing new green cards. [More]Thanks goodness this has nothing to do with that "single issue"!
The father of the Roseburg, Oregon, shooter said he doesn't know where his son got his weapons, and he declined to comment much on his son's mental state, but he was quick to say what he thought was to blame in the deadly college attack: Guns. [More]Yeah, with a great dad like you, what else could it be?
By the time he became aware of the shooting, a SWAT team had already responded. [More]So yeah, he did the rational thing and did not insert himself into the fluid dynamics of an ongoing law enforcement operation, where he would have become an immediate target. Only Media Masochists who willingly submit to this headcase would fondle themselves at the prospect of a different outcome.
If you're from Florida, let them hear from you. If you're not from Florida, tell every gun owner you know who is.On Tuesday, Oct 6th, at 9am the House Criminal Justice Subcommittee will hear the Open Carry and Strict Scrutiny bill. Committee members need to hear from you now. [More]
The Monday Poll: Stopping mass shootings [More]I have a problem with the exception in question 2, as there are not only plenty of non-violent "felons" who are so classified because they have run afoul of citizen disarmament edicts, but it also goes contrary to the inescapable truism. That in turn gets into the "Enforce existing gun laws" deception, one perpetrated this time by "leaders" on "our side," and which ought to be restated as "Enforce existing Intolerable Acts" just to put things in proper perspective.
JohnC says: Talk about knee jerk, and stupid narrow minded jackasses, you all are. O’Reille gives a talk supporting gun ownership and you attack him like he was a child molester. His statement at 5:11 is right on. Not many talking heads nationally have any support for private ownership of guns, but here is one who believes in the right and you folks destroy him because a few of his sentences and views are not lock step with your own. Well you that wrote these attack comments are way out of sync with most of the US. You better wake up to reason or you will be the ones destroying our gun rights. I am not a gun hater or a rights hater, I people, am a moderate well armed owner. I know you will all think that I should go straight to hell, and not pass go. Wake up, help those that support a citizens right to own guns even if they do not support your exact ideal. You my fellow gun owners are helping to lose our rights by your total inflexibility. Most people see you as gun nuts and do not listen at all to what you say. Some will listen to advocates like Mr. O’Reilly.If you have anything you would like to say in response, leave your reply comment over there if you want him to see it.
Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary [More]So we can still give "A" grades" to "pro-gun" politicians enabling this, right?
[S]peaking for myself, I’ll never set foot in one again until they change their policy, publicly apologize, and begin proactively supporting and promoting the right to keep and bear arms. [More]This would be the perfect company to put a coordinated squeeze on.
Simms said Wagner's testimony could "affect all of his existing cases. When an officer gives false testimony under oath, that negatively affects the officer for good." [More]That's all it could negatively affect?
Now reasonable gun control, the laws about registration, and you can’t have an AK and all that, reasonable people say “Yes.” [More]Unsurprisingly, there are a lot of false assumptions being promulgated -- one that the monster was a "conservative Republican," and the other that Bill O'Reilly gave a reasoned and inspired defense of the Second Amendment.
"It is time for people to wake up to the fact that Utopian fantasies like gun free zones simply do not work. It is time for those who control public gatherings (be it in a school or a movie theater) to wrap their heads around reality. People are needlessly dying." [More]Well, you can try reason and logic and decency like my friends at CCDL just did, but if you really want to advocate for "progressive" solutions, you need to scream obscenities and stage a public meltdown.
What kind of crippled-inside soul would deny such a person an equalizer?A wheelchair-bound homeowner is targeted in a late night, home invasion break-in. [More]
Possession of firearm or dangerous weapon in public building or court facility ... (1) Any person who intentionally possesses a loaded or unloaded firearm or any other instrument used as a dangerous weapon, while in or on a public building, shall upon conviction be guilty of a Class C felony ... Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to ... A person who is licensed under ORS 166.291 (Issuance of concealed handgun license) and 166.292 (Procedure for issuing) to carry a concealed handgun.* From CBS Seattle:
Joe Olson, former president of the college, told The Associated Press the school has only one security officer on duty at a time, and that person isn’t armed.* NR Today:
The shooter was asking people to stand up and state their religion and then started firing away...* The Blood-Dancer in Chief:
Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, said Thursday that “sensible steps that can be taken to protect our communities from gun violence continues to be a top priority of this administration.” Such steps would include ending the ability of private parties to sell guns without doing a background check on purchasers, Mr. Earnest said. Mr. Obama’s inability to get such legislation through Congress “has been a source of frustration for him,” Mr. Earnest said.* Per the Hushmail Haters, it's Kevin's fault:
According to the source close to the investigation, authorities are looking at social media posts between a person they believe may have been the shooter, and others. The conversation happened Wednesday night on 4chan. In it, the writer talks about planning to carry out a shooting. Others egg him on, giving him suggestions on how to do it, and the type of weapons to use. The responses are mixed -- with some users characterizing the would-be gunman as a pathetic loser. Others called him a twisted hero. In the posts, there is a reference to the UC Santa Barbara shooter, who wrote a manifesto and videoed himself before opening fire a year ago. "This is the only time I'll ever be in the news. I'm so insignificant," reads an apparent post by the would-be Oregon gunman.* Is this what I think it is? If so, save before it gets taken down.
OBAMA: We should politicize tragic shootings, and use victims to push anti-gun agenda.* Screenshots I took earlier today but did not post but it looks like others have come to the same conclusion:
A Virginia group is taking aim at what it calls “lethal loopholes” [More]Looks like a term from years past that the antis couldn't get to take off is being dusted off to see if it'll work at manipulating more cud-chewers this time around...
Democratic political strategists Ruy Teixeira and John Judis have been gloating for 20 years about how post-1965 immigration would soon produce a country where Republicans could not win an election, anywhere. Then Democrats could do whatever they want. [More]Thank goodness that has nothing to do with that "single issue."
A pregnant girl was rushed to the hospital after she was involved in a melee involving 30 to 40 students at a high school named in honor of President Obama.[More]
Lax laws prevented the agency from effectively targeting the flow guns across the border. (AP File Photo) [More]Take it from the Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists who did their best to spike what was really going on.
‘Public safety zones’ could allow police to keep some people out of areas [More]Hey is it too late to add an amendment, and also make 'em "Gun Free Zones," just to be extra special double super safe?
The attorney for Badger Guns says the reason Collins changed the answers to questions on the form is because he is dyslexic and the salesman had to help him understand the questions on that form. The attorney added that the seller had no reason to think Collins was deceiving him. [More]Disabilities for disabilities? And now dyslexia is a showstopper?
The need for more regulation of firearms is there, a four-person panel asserted at St. Ignatius in Baltimore Sept. 21, but at least one panelist had major doubts as to whether there is sufficient will. [More]Let me remove your doubts: There's not.
This fear mongering comes from Joseph Hubbard, 40, the president of Jeffersonville Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 100, who asserts “somebody is going get away with killing a cop because of this law.” [More]As opposed to a cop getting away with killing somebody because of the status quo?
“Protect and Serve those who Serve and Protect”[Via bondmen]
A ‘liberal paradise’ would be a place where everybody has guaranteed employment, free comprehensive health care, free education, free food, free housing, free clothing, free utilities and only law enforcement personnel have guns. And, believe it or not, such a liberal utopia does indeed exist. ... It’s called prison. [More]And don't forget to mention where any deviation from immediate and total obedience to the guards can result in a world of sadistic retaliation.
