Monday, October 12, 2015

Dildos for Defenselessness

Hundreds of students at the University of Texas at Austin will protest a new law that will allow more guns on campus not with signs or sit-ins, but by "strapping gigantic swinging dildos to our backpacks." Their mantra? #CocksNotGlocks [More]
Children. Figures they'd pick dangerous assault weapons with no legitimate spurting purpose.

I'll bet some could be convinced to do something even more meaningful.


[Via Florida Guy

No One's Talking About Taking Your Guns

We're just endorsing commonsense Australian gun laws! [More]

You know, the ones that banned all those guns and made them illegal to own anymore, and "ensur[ed] that 'personal protection' would not be regarded as a 'genuine reason' for owning, possessing, or using a firearm..."?

What kind of  paranoid would think that meant we wanted his guns?

Today's Five-Minute Activism Opportunity

Sign the Petition to Legalize Open Carry in Florida [More]
If you're from Florida, or know anyone who is, why not take a moment to sign this / pass this info along?

What You May Not Know

What you may not know is that if the check isn’t completed within 72 hours, then the gun can be sold without the background check. [More]
So the "progressive" thing to do would be to extend the infringements indefinitely.

What you may not know is Susan McCarthy, who hides who she is and what else she's about, doesn't want you to have a gun at all, and would rather you were dead than armed.

[Via Jake S]

Getting the Lead Out

EPA spends millions on military-style weapons, watchdog group reports [More]
I trust they've done the required environmental impact study?

[Via Florida Guy

Give That Gal a Nuclear Football!

[More]

[Via Florida Guy]   

The "All Clear"

My email to Diana Natalicio, President of the University of Texas at El Paso
UTEP speech and expression policies provide authorized alternatives to the sign posted outside Mr. Smith-Soto's classroom, which inarguably can discourage the lawful exercise of rights by students who fear the potential academic impacts of teacher bias. Political preference signs that contravene duly enacted law and create a hostile and discriminatory environment fall afoul of UTEP policies. If you allow that in this instance, you open the door to other personnel posting signs that different individuals and groups may regard as harassment.
Case in point: Would you remain silent if a Christian professor posted a "No same sex marriages" sign outside his classroom?
Whether you oppose or support a given issue is irrelevant. What takes precedence is equal application of policy. When that does not exist, enforcement becomes problematic, as giving one employee a pass will create a discrimination liability for UTEP if another is disciplined over a violation.
Her reply:
Thanks for sharing your perspectives, which I have forwarded to the UTEP Campus Carry Task Force.
Far be it from me to argue with a Higher Education Visionary. I guess that means anybody and everybody on campus now has the official green light to post whatever they like wherever they like, which is pretty much the way things ought to be at public universities.

Who Will Guard the Guards?

The December 2015 issue of GUNS Magazine, including my "Defending the Defenders" Rights Watch column on military recruiting centers mandated defenseless by policy, is now available at dutiful and vigilant newsstands throughout the Republic.

Meanwhile, Over at the War on Worthy Women

Claire Wolfe invites the Pro-Violence, Murder and Tyranny Lobby to pick on a girl. [More]

When Seconds Count

[Click to enlarge]

Good comparison. I suppose using the word "licensed" was a tactical consideration for the masses in order to move the ball toward the Constitutional carry goal.

False Alternatives

Now that Establishment choice Kevin McCarthy is out of the running for Speaker, WarOnGuns Correspondent Laocoön warns why two likely alternative picks will help usher in ruin:
The bottom line:
Looks like the loyal conservative candidate for Speaker is Daniel Webster, R - Florida.
Which means it will never happen. My bet is not even a dozen people will click on these links, let alone read them in total and then share them.

UPDATE: Looks like there's a lot more to this that needs to be vetted.  See HinMo's comment and then follow this link to "Cong. Webster Says Yes to Immigration Reform with a Path to Citizenship."

Looks like I at least got the title of this post right. And I'd say this is the guy.

UPDATE: This is what led to assumptions:



The Shoes of the Phisherman

Let’s be honest. The Second Amendment was passed in an era when organized police forces were few and citizen militias were useful in maintaining the peace. Its original authors could not have anticipated a time when the weapons we have a right to bear now include military-grade assault weapons that have turned our streets into battlefields. The Second Amendment’s original intent has been perverted by those who, as Pope Francis recently commented, have profited mightily. Surely there is a middle ground between the original intent of the amendment and the carnage we see today. [More]
Yes, let's be honest.

You obviously either don't know what you're talking about, which makes you a useful idiot tool, or else you do, which makes you a liar.

Gun owners of faith who also believe in the right to keep and bear arms: If your religious minister starts advocating for rendering rights unto Caesar, you have a duty to stand up and walk out.

Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste

Mayor Rahm Emanuel's office was more involved in a $20.5 million school contract with a now-indicted consultant than previously disclosed, public records indicate, but his administration has refused to release hundreds of emails that could provide a deeper understanding of how the deal came to... [More]
Forget it Jake, it's Chi-Town. It's the Chicago way.  Just ask Obama.

It''s OK, though.

They have opportunities not just for one Operation PUSH, but two.


Thursday, October 08, 2015

Shutting Down for a While

I have to prep for AZ.  I don't expect to be back posting until Monday.

If I don't catch comments, they'll have to wait, If I can't get to emails, Tweets and FB messages, I may not, depending on how many there are. The best thing to do would be to show some mercy and hold off so I'm not facing hours of processing when I get back.

Attacks on Ben Carson Show Sick Gun-grabber Preference for Death

It’s pretty revealing – not only do these sanctimonious … things not want their countrymen to have the capability of armed defense, they ridicule the concept and the faith of anyone who would presume simply to fight back with whatever means are at hand. That all goes back to their beloved “monopoly of force,” that is, a “monopoly of violence.” And CSGV knows who advocated that, because Executive Director Josh Horwitz wrote a HuffPo piece trying to justify it, citing the philosophical progenitor of the concept, German sociologist and political economist Max Weber. What he didn’t share was that his ideological hero Weber supported approving Article 48 into the Weimar constitution, establishing “emergency powers” to bypass Reichstag consent, and allowing Adolf Hitler’s rise to unchallenged power. [More]
The stupid outraged Prozis are having a foot-stamping hissy fit over the exact same advice DHS gives for the last resort.

People Die Because of This Man

They're really have no grasp of the situation, do they? [More]

How Can You Tell André Carson is Lying?

Man, that's a tough one, especially with convincing arguments like this:

[Click to enlarge]

[Via Mike H]

CUATF Credibility Validation Continues

The man who would be king
"Authorized Journalists," October 8:
The Obama administration has no plans to name a permanent director for the agency, and career agent Thomas Brandon has been serving as the acting chief since April.
CUATF, September 22:
Word is, Brandon was advised this week he AINT the guy. He will not be nominated as a permenant Director. Sometimes they get it right. 
Everybody remembers where the first crack in the Gunwalker dam appeared, right?

Murphy's Law

Rep. Tim Murphy ... is the author of a bill that addresses the mental health issues he believes are central to the mass shootings crisis. [More]
Just remember, Stalin "adjudicated" mental patients. And then remember another "law." If the Bill of Rights are going to apply to all, anyone subject to "gun disability" based on mental health ought to have the same protections afforded heinous criminals, that is, the equivalent of a jury trial -- otherwise we're putting the fate and the rights of people into the hands of those who may have a personal and/or professional conflict of interest. And ditto for "legal restoration" of rights-- I assume clear protocols are in place where a medical professional will not place malpractice charge concerns over the rights of a patient?

If not, I'd be revisiting that "A-" and endorsement.

We're the Only Ones Descending Enough

SWAT team descends on CO school over student’s Halloween costume [More]
And Claudine Lamos hit the nail on the head. I'm sure Prozis decrying the "racist" reaction to Clock Boy will be similarly indignant.

The Dominant Message

I do self searches as a matter of routine, both for reputation management and to see how the work is propagating.  Aside from just a regular search, I also check the Google "News" feed, which only picks up on "authorized journalist" sources.

It says something that the top two traffic-based slots, the links that most will ever see, go to the leftist lie pieces. That's one more reason why I ask regular readers who perceive getting value from the work, to return some value by regularly sharing my links.

Practicing Psychiatry without a License

Gun shops work with anti-suicide program [More] 
So what's the gun shop's liability if they actively participate in the program and then miss one?

Were I an FFL, I would absolutely deny a transfer to someone I perceived to be irrational, such as a Democrat. But I wouldn't formalize it into a program that would open the door to a "knew or should have known" criminal or civil charge. To do so voluntarily strikes me as ... suicidal.

[Via cydl]

Your Tax Dollars at Work

U.S. welfare flows to Cuba [More]
Life imitates art:


[Via Florida Guy]   

GIGO

After it was discovered that GrC's mass shooting tracker website was using incidents involving pellet guns and passing them off as mass shootings I got curious as to what else was hiding in their lists. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the answer is quite a bit. [More]
Interesting.

Between prepping for Arizona and following through on other priorities, I won't be able to look into this in a timely manner. My recommendation for those interested in knowing more is to use this as a launching point for your own validation efforts.

[Via Standing Liberty]

A "Progressive" Summit

Meaning, with the Opposite Day truism, in mind, it's actually a nadir. [More]

[Via bondmen]

Silent Scream

A Chanute man was indicted Tuesday on charges of manufacturing silencers in violation of federal firearms laws, U.S. Attorney Barry Grissom said. [More]
Obama nominee Barry sure looks pleased with himself.

I wonder if the "scofflaw" had any Chore Boys...?

[Via everrest]

Brooking No Competition

The men are accused of involvement in a conspiracy in which firearms were illegally purchased and sold, then smuggled to Mexico, authorities said. [More]
Gee, where would they ever even get such an idea...?

[Via Emily B]

The Unwelcome Mat

Not everyone will be welcoming Barack Obama to Roseburg. [More]

"Conservative" Cover

McCarthy has a challenge from the right, and Cheney's statement should help McCarthy with some of the hardliners, in part by giving them conservative cover to support him. [More]
Only if they're really phony establishment tools being deliberately indifferent to this and this.

UPDATE: The cover was all for naught. Let the Dolly the Love Ewe rumors begin in 3...2...1...

"Progressive" Diversity

Oh look, it's Opposite Day again. [More]

And I so want to be friends with people like her.

That said, what's with Piers Morgan Paradise arresting her for that? Yes, she's a crazed @#!*, and yes, any organization should have the right to disassociate from such a diseased lunatic, but I see no actionable threat here.

So much for "progressive" freedoms.

!!!

Is there a reason the first three paragraphs in this hit piece on Ben Carson end with exclamation points?  Aside from intentional breathless sensationalism, as opposed to journalism?  [More]

I'd imagine over the course of a career in neurosurgery, not every effort in sometimes desperate crapshoots is going to be successful, and the best possible outcomes may end up being far from satisfactory. Some things are broken and can't be fixed. I also note the sponge headline is definitive, but the narrative includes an "allegedly" qualifier. What happened in the lawsuits? Then again, maybe the guy has messed up, and were I or someone I loved the one who suffered, I don't think I'd be very forgiving.

I have reasons I've considered Ben Carson problematic, but being capable of blunders is not one of them. Show me a human being who is not.

This could cause real problems for his campaign via sound bites, hashtags and captioned posters to spread and amplify a poisonous meme. Deranged racism is one thing, but something like this can really hit home with people. I'll be interested to see how his campaign responds.

Don't Let the Door...

...hit you in the @$$... [More]

And here's a surprise:
Diller has a long track record contributing to Democratic candidates. In the 2008 election he contributed to numerous Democratic candidates including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. But he also gave money to Republican presidential candidate John McCain...
Gosh, you'd almost think Carroll Quigley was on to something...

Wednesday, October 07, 2015

Meanwhile, Over at the Racial Slur Database

Right-wing rage monkey Michelle Malkin... [More]
You forgot the "tailless" modifier, Salon.

[Via Mack H]

Unintended Consequences

[More]

Commonsense Bladder Control

Just don't laugh so hard you wet yourself. [More]

"Progressive feminists." Is it any wonder I love them so?

[Via Jeet]

Five Easy Pieces

My favorite, for showing how truly impotent the hive insects are, is Step 5. [More]

[Via Bluesgal]

#WackLivesMatter

A NEW CONSTITUTION OR THE BULLET [More]
Give me a second to consult with Mr. Benny...

380 followers in the "coalition"...?

I'll take the bullet.

[Via Florida Guy]   

Thinking Beyond the Grave

In other words, yes, we really do want to take your guns. Maybe not all of them. But a lot of them. [More]
That's pretty ambitious, Josh. Why not start small and see how it works out, plus claim an exclusive for your readers?

Whose guns are you going to take first?  Or did "we" not include "you"?

Telling It Like It Is

Of course he doesn’t know. You know why he doesn’t know? Because he is not, and has never been in his son’s life. He’s a complete failure as a father, he should be embarrassed to even show his face in public. He’s the problem here. [More]
Hear, Hear!

Talk About an Aptronym

Dickey, indeed. [More]

Doctors, Staff and Patients Killed in Hospital Massacre!

Something must be done! [More]

A Color Blind Society

Ironic, how the White House has trouble seeing black. [More]

We're the Only Ones All-Seeing Enough

We're free to record back, right? [More]

Noting who ultimately pays for these things -- in more ways than one -- I'm wondering if there's any Consumer Reports-type comparison, just to make sure no one else could provide the same basic functions at a lower cost.  I admit I haven't seen the RFP and the bids (those were done, right?), and the device itself does look pretty innovative and unique.

I gotta wonder what these babies cost (and don't forget all the tie-in systems and accessories!) and if they only sell to "Only Ones." Then again, I guess cost isn't a factor when someone else is paying for them.

[Via Skip]

The Man with No Name

I admit, with the realization that the two things they want are success and recognition, I've taken to not naming these demonic @$$holes as well. True, it won't do much about the first goal -- we all know what's needed there, so naturally the Opposite Day "progressives" are foaming-at-the-mouth against it. [More]

[Via Florida Guy]   

Double Dog Dare

Don't expect either dog to do more than yap. [More]

[Via Florida Guy]   

A Wrong Assumption

They were never closed, except to rules followers. [More]

[Via bondmen]

Failure to Register... Should Result in Serious Jail Time

No. [More]

Your move.

[Via bondmen]

You've Gotta Ask Yourself One Question

Do I feel lucky? [More]

Start the Conversation

OK, since you're asking...
[Click to enlarge]

Strong Cities Network Should Raise Alarms for Liberty Advocates

Assuming the “intelligence” will be ultimately exploitable to build cases involving U.S. citizens, what assurances are there that it will be gained in accordance with individual protections mandated in the Bill of Rights? Not to cast aspersions on member cities like Beirut, but just what “best practices” are acceptable, and will the representatives of our people, that would be the Congress, have unfettered oversight of the process? What further protections will there be against foreign law influencing decisions required to comport with “the supreme Law of the Land,” something more than one “progressive” Supreme Court Justice has expressed an interest in considering flexible? [More]
And on top of all that, they've deliberately anonymously registered their website.

BREAKING NEWS!

Jennifer Garner enjoys simple pleasures on ice-cream play date with her children... amid reports she wants to sell LA mansion she owns with Ben Affleck for $45m [More]
That reminds me, I haven't checked the current ratio on my pH Factor cultural degeneracy indicator for a while.

My Kind of Town, Chicago Is...

Someone in Chicago has been shot every 2.84 hours this year for a total of 2,349 shootings during the period of January 1, 2015 to October 6, 2015, according to crime stats published by the Chicago Tribune. [More]
Those are some stats. They kind of speak volumes about "gun control," don't they?

Not so fast.  "Authorized Journalists" to the rescue!

Bloomberg PoliticsThe Washington Post. U.S. News. ABC News.

In short, without the edicts it would be worse, Chicago has eased up on those edicts, they don't have as many "mass shootings," it's tough to get complete data, and my personal favorite, because it implies we all need to adopt "the Chicago way," the criminals get their guns from places with more lax laws.

In a nutshell, if only they would disarm you and me.

Forget it Jake, it's Chi-Town.

Tuesday, October 06, 2015

Five-Minute Activism

I just did this. If it's worth it where you live, go for it. Be nice if gun owners in states where the antis are safe had an alternative... [More]

When "Progressives" Collide

A corrupt Democrat politician (but I repeat myself) and an "Authorized Journalist... well, since I can't cheer for anybody, I may as well make some popcorn and enjoy the show. [More]

What the hell was that?  It looked like a poorly-aimed Five-Point-Palm Exploding Heart Technique.

[Via Florida Guy]   

It's a Small World After All

With one common language... [More]

[Via Geordan]

Evil Is

Coming soon, to a Caliphate near you. [More]

Warning to Potential Runaway Slaves

Don't you dare try to escape the plantation. [More

Oh, Look-- Raw Story Gets It Wrong ... Again

Oath Keepers call for Waffle House boycott [More]
No it didn't. I included an unequivocal statement with a link for a purpose. You'd think if someone was going to presume to write about a subject with anything approaching understanding what he's reading, he'd, at a minimum, you know, click on it...

Case in point:
MILM is an acronym for “mother I’d like to meet,” which is apparently a slightly less sexualized “MILF” reference to the anti-gun group Moms Demand Action — which Codrea frequently targets with complaints.
No it's not.

And then there's this:
Codrea dismissed the claim as after-the-fact damage control.
Did I? I thought I made a point of specifically calling it "a diversion to mask discrimination against all gun owners."

This Travis Gettys character sure is consistently wrong. I can't tell if he's stupid, lazy, or just a liar. Or all three. Kind of like the comment posters there. In any case, it looks like I may be the recipient of a developing Raw Story cyber-stalker's unrequited Prozi man crush...

Ah well, at least he spells the name right.

UPDATE: Looks like Ken Meyer of Mediaite is also subject matter research-challenged.

Who Says They're All "Innocent"

Thug A kills Thug B. Net benefit to society. [More]

That's a "report" from June, but it was just sent to me with a request for rebuttal arguments. Bloodthirsty Prozis demand death as proof. They totally ignore defensive gun uses where the simple presentation of a gun is enough to stop the attack without any violence, that is, to increase the peace.

We saw Mr. Hardy's post just a few hours ago, showing up to 1.9 MILLION home defenses annually, corroborating the Kleck surveys. Even the much smaller National Institute of Justice study put the number at a minimum of 1.5M.

And note these are surveys, which don’t account for people who would not answer such a question—for instance, someone who is prohibited from gun ownership or use, such as someone with a bs restraining order from a vindictive ex, or someone who could get in trouble with the law, like in NYC or NJ or L.A. or DC.

See how these evil bastards control the narrative in order to perpetuate their sick lies? But that’s what most people get on the “news,” and that’s what they believe to shape how they vote. It is evil.

First Hurdle Cleared

Despite "Republican" turncoat Chris Latvala trying to trip the hurdlers. [More]

It's hardly the first time. Were I a Florida voter, I'd let the Democrat have the seat next time, even a rabidly anti-gun one, to teach the GOP a more far-reaching lesson about what happens to those who side with my enemies.

And look at the Jolly fellow who endorsed him.  Yeah, he must be worthy of all that support. I'd let him know he'd better be a hell of a lot more careful about who he picks as friends.


Speaking of Absolute (Expletive)...

"Don't give me that. It's absolute (expletive)." said Goddard. [More]
Nobody's "giving" you anything. We're just not letting you take what you have no claim to.

[Via Mack H]

We're the Only Ones Disturbed Enough

The footage, posted on social media, begins with a Los Angeles police officer getting out of his patrol car, followed by a shot of a handgun held by the person shooting the video. That individual was recording the video from inside a car parked behind the officer. [More]
The default assumption is that this is a manifestation of hatred and violence, as opposed to a demonstration that people who do the same thing every day to citizens are not the "Only Ones" capable of following and recording someone while armed. In terms of creating a bigger divide, historically, LAPD has proven more than capable of doing that all by their own selves.

That said, I don't blame them for having their awareness and caution levels raised.  Just understand when We the People have that same reaction, because again, they're not the "Only Ones" creeped out by that.

"I'm the NRA"


[More]

Association Bylaws, Article III, Sec. 11, "Involuntary Termination of Membership and Disciplinary Proceedings" states in part: "Any individual or organization member may be suspended or expelled for good cause, including, but not limited to, any conduct which is contrary to, or in violation of the Bylaws of the Association."

That includes conduct and advocacy in direct conflict with Article II, Purposes and Objectives, section 1: "To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms, in order that the people may always be in a position to exercise their legitimate individual rights of self-preservation and defense of family, person, and property, as well as to serve effectively in the appropriate militia for the common defense of the Republic and the individual liberty of its citizens."

Additionally, Article III, "Membership," section 1., "Eligibility," requires that the member "subscribes to the objectives and purposes of the Association."

But if Fairfax didn't have the stones to do it to this guy, Geraldo will have to find the door on his own.

Support for Kleck

Using a 5,200 person telephone surgery [survey-- see comment by Ed], authors conclude that annually about 1.9 million people draw a gun during a home intrusion, but don't actually see the intruder, another 503,000 draw a gun and do see the intruder and (not surprisingly) 497,000 report the intruder fled in response to the gun. [More]
David T. Hardy found a study from 1997.

Clearing the Field

[E]very jab you get in at your fellow establishmentarians like Marco Rubio is going to be used against them by the left. [More]
Says the leftist, who wants to guarantee that at least there will be a "pathway to citizenship" Republican if the Democrats implode. Or are we supposed to believe he really cares and is just trying to be helpful?

Stop Me If You've Heard This One

A plagiarist and a fake Indian walk into a bar... [More]

Just One Question

Why isn't this idiotically-grinning thing in a burqa? [More]

[Via Florida Guy]   

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad NRA?

Especially when the "electorate" has been sufficiently programmed? [More]

That's why, ultimately, it's not about whether citizen disarmament edicts will pass -- it's about whether or not they will be obeyed. Gun rights "leaders" publicly disparaging "I will not comply" advocates would do well to remember that when their methods become irrelevant, it will be the "extremists" who matter.

"If [X] wins we'll lose our gun rights!" is a false alternative offered by those with rice bowls to keep filled and by those who haven't thought things through.

[Via cydl]

Time to Stop Doing Blow

It makes you prone to paranoid statements like "Fear is winning." [More]

It's nice to hear him say he's "not an anti-gun absolutist." Why, he grew up around guns! His brother is a collector!

Why does that sound like a hackneyed trope?

[Via Michael G]

Captain's Log

* By the way, Herschel's link to the Moloch piece has a great example in comments of what that "national conversation on guns" -- the one "progressives" say they want -- looks like in practice:
gratuitous [makes his anti-gun point, trying to sound all reasonable and adult]Sho Rembo [makes his pro-gun counterpoint]gratuitous: F*!# off, @$$hole. Nobody asked you.

We're the Only Ones Oblivious Enough

A former sheriff and his chief deputy were unaware of an illicit trade in machine guns operating secretly in their department, according to testimony in a federal gun running trial. [More]
"Barn, did you know any of this was goin' on?"

"Heck no, Andy. I'm still tryin' to figure out why Thelma Lou wants me to get a penicillin shot."

Nun But the Brave

The Little Sisters of the Poor is an international Catholic institute that takes care of the elderly. The Sisters consider it a sin to provide their employees health coverage for contraceptives (including drugs classified by the FDA as abortion-inducing) as required under Obamacare, and want the same kind of exemption given to churches. [More]
Has the administration checked to make sure these guys are compliant?

A Methodist to Their Madness

The final statement in the resolution on gun violence states, “reflecting the traditional role of The United Methodist Church that has been one of safety and sanctuary, every United Methodist Church is officially declared a weapon-free zone.” [More]
Inviting martyrdom to make a point?

At least they don't have to worry about IRS audits over "regulation advocacy" activities -- those only apply to "conservative" religious causes.

I don't suppose they'll make any guarantees?
[Via Standing Liberty]

Natural Truisms

Predators flee from the strong. [More]

But they seek out the weak to devour.

Bearing Arms the Hard Way

HUNTER ESCAPES ATTACK BY SHOVING ARM DOWN BEAR'S THROAT [More]
Sometimes you can't retreat from, or go around, over or under that which will destroy you.  Sometimes, if you are to survive, the only way out is to go through.

I recall a similar story about an African farmer and a leopard.

Note the elk hunter emerged with the proper attitude and no hatred or blame for the bear, which was reacting to surprise circumstances. I won't be surprised, as this story circulates, to see "progressive" comments reflecting hatred for the hunter.

Monday, October 05, 2015

Hillary’s Desperate ‘Hail Mary’ on Guns Can Be Intercepted and Run Back

Basically, Clinton is dictating the terms of surrender to American gun owners and presuming they will just roll over and take it, and that she will have the power to go door-to-door and enforce her demands when a critical mass tells her to go pound sand. If a growing “I will not comply” movement has made an unenforceable dilemma for issuers of edicts in Connecticut, New York, and elsewhere, trying to impose the same thing that doesn’t work locally on a national scale seems the definition of insanity writ large. [More]
Should Juanita Broaddrick have had a gun to defend herself from rape? Is she a liar? Yes or No?

Speaking of Fantasies...

Combat Vets Destroy the NRA’s Heroic Gunslinger Fantasy [More]
That presupposes such fantasies exist outside the sick minds of juveniles and anti-gun "progressives"-- but I repeat myself. It also presumes to have destroyed something other than the credibility of National Socialist Review with anyone capable of independent thought. Right off the bat, anti-gun male Joshua Holland reveals he's only interested in disparaging better men who don't share in his contemptible self-imposed helplessness.

These bastards would rather that every survivor of a DGU had been killed than armed. Those people know from experience that fantasies and illusions of heroism had nothing to do with anything.

My first thoughts on reading what the "military experts" think the qualifiers ought to be were that we had better disarm most LEOs-- after all, how many times a year -- if that -- are most of them required to requalify, what does that consist of, what percentage do they have to score, and how many do-over attempts do they get?

My next thought was there was a time when one of our greatest military heroes was a guy named Arnold. How would you characterize someone who swore an oath and then betrays what the Founders knew to be necessary to the security of a free State?

Look for the antis to increasingly trot out these partisan operatives, and for the meme to spread like wildfire -- they're absolutely desperate and furious, and the Fourth Estate Fifth Column media has been looking for fresh material to "editorialize" and "report" on.

Peddling Prevarication

Obama peddles gun control fable [More]
Lies are easy to get people to swallow if you can hide relevant considerations that refute them. The important thing to remember is they are lies, the withholding of inconvenient facts is intentional, and the reason a lie is being told in the first place is because the person telling it wants to commit as fraud on those he is telling it to.

So naturally, noting the truism that for "progressives," every day is Opposite Day, WaPo's resident Julius Streicher Award candidate, E.J. Dionne, doubles down and accuses anyone of pointing out those disconnects of being a liar.

Playing with Fire

Obviously, if a manufacturer is out there cranking out poorly designed and constructed junk that blows up in your hand or fails to perform when you need it, no one wants to give the guy a pass, including (and especially) gun rights advocates. Similarly, if a car maker puts a model on the streets that bursts into flames as the steering wheel locks and the brakes fail, you’re not going to find a coalition of motorists clamoring to absolve them of all responsibility. But people would righteously object to holding automakers responsible for criminal abuses. If someone steals your car and plows into a school bus, who in their right mind would demand going after the manufacturer’s or the dealer’s deep pockets? What about if someone gets liquored up and ends up smashing into oncoming traffic or running over pedestrians? Should we start bankrupting shareholders and frog-marching CEOs? [More]
My latest GUNS Magazine "Rights Watch" column is now online.

Putsch!

Mrs. Clinton plans to push for imposing tighter gun-purchase background checks and banning certain military-style weapons, among other items. [More]
Gotta make the world safe for that rapist "husband" of hers...

Hey, she never did answer my questions ... probably because no in-the-tank-for-her "Authorized Journalists"  would ever ask them.

I just did again. Feel free to do the same.

Guide for the Reading-Challenged

The organization known as Oath Keepers is demanding a “marketplace response” to Waffle House’s no-gun policy. [More]
No, I made it unmistakeably clear, emphasizing the point with a link to my "Who Speaks for Oath Keepers?" piece, that I was, and I quote:
 ...speaking for myself...
And I didn't "demand" -- I simply stated my position, gave my reasons, shared my response and said "I encourage..." and "I hope..." others would follow suit.  If individuals in comments happen to agree with me, that's their right and their choice.

So it figures the author then says:
The thing about this issue is at it’s heart, it’s not about guns at all. It is whether or not businesses have the right to deny service to those they choose to.
No, because the piece he's featuring never claimed otherwise. The issue is, at its heart, about not doing business with people who impose unacceptable and offensive conditions. If Waffle House or other entities won't offer a guarantee to back their actions, I see no reason to place myself under their imposed conditions.

What kind of "libertarian" would fault that?

Cause for Alarm

Secret Service Targeting of Chaffetz Alarms Lawmakers [More]
If they dare do this to the head of Oversight, what more would this lawless government dare do to you and me?

So naturally, the imported subversive du jour and his domestic enemy cheerleaders think Alinsky Rule 5 ridicule is just the ticket.

Just like when the committee was going after gunwalking. There have been untold and ongoing human deaths no one has been held accountable for. And these Opposite Day Prozis have done nothing but derail all efforts to obtain justice for dead Mexicans. The "migrants" are people they fraudulently claim to care about, but in fact, they're just exploiting them for a much deadlier agenda.

There's Gotta Be a Rational Explanation

Of 170 held after Waco biker shooting, all are now out of jail, with none charged in killings [More]
Meanwhile, Grassley's staffers continue to ignore their promise.

It Could Have Been Worse

Going my way...?
He could have pointed something else. [More]

I guess Francis didn't make much of an impression...

[Via BE]

So Can We Still Give Enablers an "A" Grade on Guns?

Americans will be vastly outnumbered by mass immigration unless Congress hits the “pause” button on issuing new green cards. [More]
Thanks goodness this has nothing to do with that "single issue"!

Come On You Apes, You Wanna Live Forever???




Oh, sorry, I accidentally embedded the wrong video. I meant to post this one.

[Via Florida Guy]   

We're Number One!

I missed this when it first came out. It's excellent. [Watch]

[Via Thaddeus F]

May I Be Blunt?

So the oath was meaningless to you, Emily? [More]

Obviously.  Because the oath says you will renounce all foreign allegiances, not become "half an American."

I get why it's in a party's interests, but why is it in any nation's interests to accept this?  Or to accept this?

A New Bumper Sticker?

[More]

Yeah, I know, inanimate objects can't be blamed.  I was just doing a variation on a theme for someone who has more than asked for it.

And I'm reminded that the anti-gun Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists at Newsweek have killed more people than the Umpqua monster.

Putting the Blame Where It Belongs

The father of the Roseburg, Oregon, shooter said he doesn't know where his son got his weapons, and he declined to comment much on his son's mental state, but he was quick to say what he thought was to blame in the deadly college attack: Guns. [More]
Yeah, with a great dad like you, what else could it be?

[Via several of you]

Non-Lethal Lament

By the time he became aware of the shooting, a SWAT team had already responded. [More]
So yeah, he did the rational thing and did not insert himself into the fluid dynamics of an ongoing law enforcement operation, where he would have become an immediate target. Only Media Masochists who willingly submit to this headcase would fondle themselves at the prospect of a different outcome.

Anti-gun males -- how pathetic.

[Via William T]

Florida Alert

On Tuesday, Oct 6th, at 9am the House Criminal Justice Subcommittee will hear the Open Carry and Strict Scrutiny bill. Committee members need to hear from you now. [More]
If you're from Florida, let them hear from you.  If you're not from Florida, tell every gun owner you know who is.

Survey Says...

The Monday Poll: Stopping mass shootings [More]
I have a problem with the exception in question 2, as there are not only plenty of non-violent "felons" who are so classified because they have run afoul of citizen disarmament edicts, but it also goes contrary to the inescapable truism.  That in turn gets into the "Enforce existing gun laws" deception, one perpetrated this time by "leaders" on "our side," and which ought to be restated as "Enforce existing Intolerable Acts" just to put things in proper perspective.

What did Mr. Pynchon observe about such manipulation tactics?

That said, go ahead and give the editorial board reason to regret asking in the first place -- because right now, it looks like things are skewed in the wrong direction, and they will crow if that continues.

[Via bondmen]

Vanderboegh on the Oregon Massacre


The Most Busted Name in News?

It wouldn't surprise me, but I need to see the original CNN source for this. [More]


[Via Florida Guy]   

The Establishment Solution

See the video beginning at around 1:44 in. [More]

How much of a deterrent do you think young adults like this pose?

"A Moderate Well Armed Owner"

Comment left at my last AmmoLand piece:
JohnC says: Talk about knee jerk, and stupid narrow minded jackasses, you all are. O’Reille gives a talk supporting gun ownership and you attack him like he was a child molester. His statement at 5:11 is right on. Not many talking heads nationally have any support for private ownership of guns, but here is one who believes in the right and you folks destroy him because a few of his sentences and views are not lock step with your own. Well you that wrote these attack comments are way out of sync with most of the US. You better wake up to reason or you will be the ones destroying our gun rights. I am not a gun hater or a rights hater, I people, am a moderate well armed owner. I know you will all think that I should go straight to hell, and not pass go. Wake up, help those that support a citizens right to own guns even if they do not support your exact ideal. You my fellow gun owners are helping to lose our rights by your total inflexibility. Most people see you as gun nuts and do not listen at all to what you say. Some will listen to advocates like Mr. O’Reilly.
If you have anything you would like to say in response, leave your reply comment over there if you want him to see it.

Saturday, October 03, 2015

Thank Goodness This Has No Bearing on That "Single Issue"

Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary [More]
So we can still give "A" grades" to "pro-gun" politicians enabling this, right?

Waffle House No Guns Policy Merits Marketplace Response

[S]peaking for myself, I’ll never set foot in one again until they change their policy, publicly apologize, and begin proactively supporting and promoting the right to keep and bear arms. [More]
This would be the perfect company to put a coordinated squeeze on.

We're the Only Ones Negatively Affected Enough

Simms said Wagner's testimony could "affect all of his existing cases. When an officer gives false testimony under oath, that negatively affects the officer for good." [More]
That's all it could negatively affect?

In-the-court's-face perjury to obtain a fraudulent conviction against a citizen can't affect an Only One's employment and freedom?