Showing posts sorted by relevance for query "Michael Savage". Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query "Michael Savage". Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, April 10, 2009

Why are So Many 'Conservatives' Following Michael Savage?


I have never understood the Michael Savage phenomenon. He's loud, he's abrasive, and he's hardly the "conservative" so many apparently think he is. I guess tapping into the border issue has convinced some that he is a kindred spirit. For anyone who place the Constitution first, he is not.

Case in point, today's amazingly ignorant screed, "Why are the police outgunned?":

"So I put the question to the Savage Nation. Is it time to ban assault rifles? What are they really needed for?" [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column shows the true nature of an "obnoxious carnival barker" who essentially claims--if you read what he's saying--that the Second Amendment is useless.

This one is important to share, because corporate media foists him on a public that doesn't know any better and represents him as a leading conservative voice. Don't let him--or them--get away with it. Tell a friend?

Also meet an honorable Savage, see a reminder about a TV show you probably ought to watch, find out about a rally in Oregon, and, of course, get the very latest commentary from my fellow GREs.

Wednesday, August 01, 2012

Savage Capitulation

Michael Savage is one among prominent conservatives who have come out favoring a ban on assault weapons, in light of the tragic mass shooting in the Colorado movie theater on July 20th. [More]
I rarely disagree with my friends at JPFO, but if we're to equate the term "conservative" with someone who promotes and adheres to founding era principles established in the Constitution, this obnoxious carnival barker hardly qualifies.

Not only is this not a new development for the guy, neither is channeling his inner Karger. Savage told his followers (and that's one anyone who unquestioningly believes this fraud must be):
Of course, I can already hear callers telling me, “Well, Mike, if we’re armed with these weapons, the government can’t possibly take our rights away.” That is nonsense. If the government wants to take your rights away or imprison you for whatever reason, your owning an assault rifle is not going to stop it.
One can safely assume what Weiner's counsel at Warsaw would have been.

What a useless (useful to some?) distraction this character is.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

The Savage Violation

America's most fiery conservative talk show host backing liberal Jerry Brown for California's attorney general?

Yes, it's true.

Michael Savage, the nation's third-most-listened-to radio host (and fourth-most-influential host, according to NewsMax's Top 25 List), confirmed that he recently donated $5,600 – the maximum allowable – to Brown's campaign. [More]

No, it's not all "true". While "conservative" is a relative term based on what it is you're trying to "conserve," the implication in the US is that it refers to someone who believes in the founding principles of the Constitution.

I've long shaken my head in wonder at anyone who could be bamboozled into thinking this bloviating loudmouth is sincere about anything other than self-promotion. I never did see any depth in the guy, but then, what did Mr. Mencken tell us about the American public?

We've seen what Jerry Brown thinks of gun rights. He's basing a large part of his campaign running commercials against them. By donating money to his campaign, Savage has provided aid and comfort to the enemy. He has revealed himself to be the enemy.

Anyone wasting time or money following this obnoxious carnival barker is chasing a sterile queen bee. If you've ever bought one of his books, congratulations. You just helped finance the further enslavement of ourselves and our posterity.

Monday, February 28, 2005

BATFE Fails the Constitution

“JPFO'S NEW DVD, ‘BATFE FAILS THE TEST’ has apparently got the gun goons shaking in their boots. Unable to counter the blatant evidence that their ‘experts’ are unscientific bumblers who don't even understand firearms, ATF agents are now spreading the rumor that the footage is fake.

“HA! When you see it you know that the only thing "fake" about it is the BATFE's ‘expertise.’ I'm in awe of Len Savage (the real firearms expert you'll see in the film) having the guts to take these goons on.”
—Claire Wolfe

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership has once again proven it deserves the reputation for producing the most innovative educational materials for educating Americans about our right to keep and bear arms. They have followed up the gut-wrenching historical documentary "Innocents Betrayed" with another outstanding and infuriating video, "BATFE Fails the Test."

Competition shooter John Glover is an ordinary American who is fascinated by firearms--to the point where he learned gunsmithing and began assembling and selling guns from kits.

Enter the federal gun grabbers. Seven of his rifles are seized and Glover is charged with manufacturing and selling a machine gun. In other words, the federal government has decided Mr. Glover is a criminal, and it sets out to steal his property and destroy his life.

"BATFE Fails the Test" is raw video footage of BATFE Agent Michael Cooney, the supposed expert who wrote the report declaring one of the weapons a machinegun, saying that it fired “automatically more than one shot without manual reloading by a single function of the trigger.” We see Agent Cooney at a police firing range in North Carolina, demonstrating the weapon's operation. There's just one problem--he can't get it to fire full auto.

Twelve attempts produce just two incidents of string fire, which Glover's defense team firearms expert, Len Savage, declares a "malfunction." Cooney doesn't want to hear it, and becomes increasingly irritated and defensive as Savage challenges his "expertise." Savage then analyzes the disassembled weapon parts on camera, and sure enough, just as he predicted on the range, firing pin components are worn, causing the occasional string fire malfunction.

The thing could have blown up in the "competent" government "expert's" face, but he was too oblivious to realize it.

The upside for Mr. Glover is all charges against him were dismissed. The downside, in addition to having his life turned inside out and having the fear of government put into him, is that he is left in debt from fighting a legal battle that should never have taken place--plus, the BATFE has refused to return his rightful property.

Gun owners need to see this to believe it, so that we understand this could happen to any of us--own a semiauto rifle that needs some gunsmith work and we could be declared felons and pursued with vengeance. And if we're not fortunate enough to be able to afford mounting a competent defense against the unlimited resources of the federal government, our lives will be destroyed.

You owe it to yourself to get this outrageous and infuriating video, and to understand what power the Michael Cooneys of the world have assumed over us.

Read the Shotgun News article: VITAL WARNING TO ALL OWNERS OF SEMIAUTOMATIC FIREARMS

Order your own copy of "BATFE Fails the Test" on VHS or DVD:
http://jpfo.org/batfevideo.htm

Friday, January 04, 2019

Savage Nation

“I OWN 3 GUNS AND I CAN DO SOME SERIOUS F—ING DAMAGE,” the email went on. “I WILL KILL AS MANY OF YOU RACIST-SUPPORTING/ENABLING WHITE SUPREMACISTS AS I F—ING CAN.” [More]
This is what happens when the low-hanging fruit gets riled by "progressive" ideologues who can't conceive of personal repercussions.

Reporting this to the authorities shows this is a very real terrorist threat. I wonder if Michael Savage might be rethinking his obnoxious and ignorant position on guns.

Thing is, there are plenty in the "Democrat" camp who think this is all fine, self-inflicted and deserved.  Case in point:


A prediction about reaping whirlwinds comes to mind.

Friday, January 29, 2016

Because It's All about Michael Savage

“I’m demanding an investigation,” he said. “I’m demanding the attorney general send a task force into Oregon.”
And if the feds won’t, the United Nations ought to look into it, Savage said. [More]
Yeah, that's just what the Patriot movement is all about, you fraudulent carnival barker.

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

The Savage Damnation

 

I call this to your attention not so much to stand up for Rush Limbaugh as to ask a question about Weiner: Why would any "conservative" in general -- and gun owner in particular -- spend one minute of their life listening to this fraudulent and obnoxious carnival barker?

My contention is that most don't know, and it serves certain purposes to allow that mass to follow a sterile bee queen.

Thursday, January 03, 2019

Meanwhile, Over at the Tolerant Left...

Michael Savage, facing death threats, heads to secret location [More]
I'll have more to say about this later-- this one leads to some related observations, but right now I'm occupied on another project that could take the rest of the day.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

This...Is...OAKLAND!!!

Over 1,000 guns were bought back by Oakland officials over the weekend in one of the largest ever buy-back events on record; nevertheless six people have been murdered in the city since Friday.
Oh my.

Well that didn't work. And we had such high expectations.

You'd think we'd see some progress with this tactic after all these years.

Maybe if Captain David Kozicky wasn't out chasing phantom .50's, maybe if California "Only Ones" more interested in perks than crime control hadn't backed back that dolt Jerry Brown who failed at doing so for AG, maybe if sterile queen bee Michael Savage hadn't done the same, we might be a little closer to addressing what would work...in Oakland and the rest of California.

So...any bets on when the next "buyback" will be?

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

A Weiner in the White House?

Michael Savage...says he may leave the airwaves to make a bid for the presidency.
Why not?

All the other "conservatives" are frauds, so what's one more?

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Wake Me when It's Time to Care, Part Two

Police Investigating Most Intense Death Threats of Michael Savage’s Career: ‘Die Motherf**ker Die’ [More]
Let the Jerry Brown supporter get one of those "assault weapons" he wants to make illegal for me to own.

[Via Mack H]

Saturday, August 04, 2007

The California Caliphate

Police are testing guns recovered from raids in which authorities arrested seven members of an Oakland Black Muslim splinter group who investigators suspect were involved in the killing of a journalist and two others.
Oakland?

Isn't that the city Jerry Brown mismanaged? And he went on to be elected California Attorney General because all those police groups said he was such a hotshot crime fighter? Like, you, Dave Kozicki? Great job you're doing there in Oakland, buddy. Bet all those .50 cals that can go through two police cruisers are hell to face every day.

Get ready to see it spread, Californians. Your "public servant" are primarily interested in their benefits and pensions--that and getting raises in percentages you in the private sector who pay for everything can only dream about.

But take heart in one thing: they're working 'round the clock to make sure you don't have any guns. After all, the policy of the AG's office is you have no individual right, and that's backed up by rulings from both the California Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit.

That'll show those "splinter groups".

Insha'Allah.

UPDATE: And let's not forget the role that self-promoting "conservative talk show host" Michael Savage played in bringing Brown more political power.

Monday, September 23, 2013

And They Say There Are No Stupid Questions

Do you agree that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own and bear guns without infringement? [More]
I wonder how many ignoramuses who don't know why they're wrong and get all angry and obnoxious with people who do answered "yes"?  I don't fee like giving out my edress and zip code to find out-- I get enough targeted spam as is.

See, there's a problem with some websites people accept as sympatico because of the tone they strike to appeal to a certain readership. Ever since I found out Ruddy was part of a mutual admiration society with Clinton, I've had about as much use for Newsmax as I've had with that obnoxious carnival barker "conservative" Michael Savage.

Yet again I must defer to Mr. Pynchon.

Monday, April 01, 2013

A Limiting Factor

I'm no Michael Savage fan, but the caller sounds plausible. [More]

[Via Andrea Shea King]

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Of Stupid Trees and Messengers of Peace

For some reason, this post has disappeared from WarOnGuns. I am reposting it at the original date and time from the Internet Archive, complete with comments so they will not be lost.
FATAL ATTRACTION star MICHAEL DOUGLAS is planning to lobby the US government for tighter gun control, because he's still haunted by rocker JOHN LENNON's 1980 shooting death.
I guess when you've demonstrated you have no control over yourself, you must not believe others are capable of self-control, either. Which means they can't be trusted with guns.
Since Douglas feels compelled to continue his unprovoked attack on my rights, I feel compelled to dust off the following open letter from some years back. As it's no longer posted anywhere else on the net, I thought I'd resurrect it here on WarOnGuns.

---

September 8, 1999
Mr. Michael Douglas
C/O Creative Artists Agency
9830 Wilshire Blvd
Beverly Hills, CA 90212

"PRESS RELEASE: NEW YORK - Renowned film and television actor Michael Douglas challenged the international community to do more to control the spread of small arms worldwide. Before a unique gathering of foreign ministers, UN officials, arms experts, and arms lobbyists, Douglas, a newly appointed UN Messenger of Peace, relayed movingly the facts that 'speak for themselves which underlie the need for responsible control of small weapons.'"

Dear Mr. Douglas,

"Sex is a wave that just sweeps over me. When the urge comes, I am helpless."

These are your pathetic words. I cannot believe that a grown man would utter them, let alone share them with the world. But somehow, for someone self-inflated enough to allow himself to be labeled a "United Nations Messenger of Peace," hearing that you have spouted such inanities does not surprise me.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

They sound like the words of a psychopath awakening from a blackout to find his clothes splattered and several hours missing from memory. Ultimately, they are your admission that you have abdicated responsibility for your actions, that you cannot control yourself. It sounds like you need to be locked up.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

So how predictable that you have instead become a spokesman for global "gun control." Obviously, since you can't trust yourself, the thought of others not sharing your moral defects must be too much to handle; after all, if others are capable of self control, then the problem must be yours. Better to blame them, and better yet--blame their guns! If they didn't have them, they couldn't use them! And if those damn whore-their-way-to-the-top women would just stop letting you get into their...

Still, have you informed your current sex partner(s?) that you would rather see her (them?) assaulted, raped or murdered than armed? But I forget--you rich and famous folks employ bodyguards (armed ones, right?), and there's never a shortage of police and private security around whenever you make a public appearance. Never mind.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

"This is not the world I want to leave to my son," you bemoan, decrying that the world contains all ideas and things, that these can be used for good or ill, and ultimately, that free will produces choices and consequences.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

What your son has really needed is for you to be a man of honor, one who understands and lives by principles of decency and restraint--instead of an out-of-control adolescent rabbit. You have betrayed and defrauded him as you have betrayed and defrauded your wife, and the obligations of the marriage covenant that you entered freely into.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

Really. Did anyone ever tell you "no" when you were growing up? Your old man couldn't keep his pants zipped either--maybe it's his fault? Were there no restraints on whatever self-gratifying indulgence you wanted to wallow in? Was learning to sneak and cheat and blame "a wave" rather than yourself for your abject moral failure the tradeoff for having everything material in life handed to you?

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

My young sons understand "no," Mr. Douglas, at least better than you appear to. The savage instincts of little boys notwithstanding, there are limits on what they can have, and expected standards for their behavior and integrity. And they receive these lessons not just through admonishments, but, more importantly, through the conduct and example of a loving mother and father who understand their obligations, cherish honoring them, and control themselves accordingly.

But our kids are still working on things and we understand that. For instance, the other day, one of the boys skinned his hand on a branch he was climbing from.

"Stupid tree!" he shouted, angrily kicking the "offending" limb.

Oh well, he'll learn. We have plenty of time, love and patience to give him and his brother before they'll need to claim their rights and responsibilities as men. But you gotta admit, the way he blamed a thing rather than himself reflects that he is still very much a child, and such transference seems pretty silly and immature to adults. Trust me--it's a grownup thing.

"Wherever arms flow, the violence follows," you childishly declare.

Oh come on, Mr. Douglas, "Stupid guns?"

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

"Stupid urge," Mr. Douglas?

Do you also blame your "stupid penis" for your contemptible lack of sexual fidelity?

That society compensates your corrupted ethics and reasoning with celebrity, when by all objective standards you should be regarded as a weakling and a reprobate, speaks not of your achievements but of the misplaced cultural values you exemplify and feed off of. That amoral privileged dilettantes like you, who conduct their lives with arrogance, deception, deviancy and gall are honored and rewarded should be but an ironic joke.

Are you truly deluded enough to think that your ridiculous worldview merits anything but loathing and resistance? After all, you're relying on socialist world government functionaries to implement and administer your criminally ignorant, genocide-enabling manifesto. Under force of arms, I might add.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

What bullshit excuse-making. How weak of you. How puerile and despicable.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

Based on your own words, you cannot (or, more likely, will not) control yourself. What makes you think that Americans who unyieldingly believe in their Constitution will let you control them?

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

You go ahead and continue being helpless, Mr. Douglas. But you would also do well to realize that your liberty-minded countrymen are not. Unlike you, we are responsible, self-controlling adults, and we will not allow ourselves to be disarmed, nor our freedoms compromised; not by your calculating UN handlers, and certainly not by the infantile, stupid, weak and morally defective useful idiots they so effectively manipulate.

"When the urge comes, I am helpless."

I know a vet who can fix that for you. Until then, and especially if he invites you up in front of the General Assembly, you might want to keep away from Kofi Annan's leg.

With utmost sincerity,

David Codrea

posted by David Codrea | 6:22 AM 
Anonymous said...
Michael Douglas is a most despicable, noisome twerp. I never could stand the slimeball. And the fact that Catherine Zeta-Jones married him speaks volumes about her.
12/02/2005 11:17 PM
David said...
There is a very effective way and means of stopping these Holly-woodheads, Flaming Media and Ultra-Liberal Corporations. STOP BUYING THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES! BOYCOTT!

Bet they will have a sudden 'change of heart' if you hit them where it hurts - their wallets!

ê àäó ñ tyrants!
(To HELL with Tyrants!)
12/03/2005 8:09 PM
David said...
By the way Daivd - EXCELLENT article!
12/03/2005 8:11 PM
Firehand said...
As I recall, didn't she make him sign an agreement basically handing her everything he owns if he's caught cheating on her? She insisted on it based on his past record.
12/07/2005 9:05 AM
David Codrea said...
Per The Washington Times, Culture Briefs, Insuring it all, January 15, 2004:

The prenuptial agreement between Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones reportedly entitles her to $5 million for any act of infidelity on Douglas's part."
— Cullen Murphy, writing on "Looking for Trouble," in the January/February issue of the Atlantic Monthly
12/07/2005 6:15 PM

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Who Shall Guard the Guards?

[I just received this essay from Mike Vanderboegh. It is pasted here as a Guest Editorial complete and unedited except for minor formatting.]

"Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?" -- Decimus Iunius Iuvenalis, Juvenal's Satires, 6.347-48.

Lisa Simpson: "If you're the police, who will police the police?"
Homer: "I dunno, Coast Guard?"
We've been here before. A Republican administration, mildly allergic to the Second Amendment, is about to give way to a virulently anti-gun Democrat regime. The lying, arrogant and armed bureaucrats of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms are eager to curry favor and lick the boots of their incoming masters. The last time this led to Waco and the deaths of 85 innocent people. This time I fear it will lead to something worse.

David Olofson is not a household name, even in the community of gun rights activists. He should be. While gunnies have been worried about the Bush administration's petty treasons to the Second Amendment in the matters of the Heller D.C. gun ban case and the appointment of the new anti-gun director of the ATF, Michael J. Sullivan, the decision in the case of US v. Olofson in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin has escaped much attention. Forget Heller. It is, in the grand scheme of things unimportant, trumped as it is by endemic government misconduct. Whether the Supreme Court decides this summer if we are citizens or serfs is immaterial if the abuses of power, constitutional rule of law and even common sense which are evident in the Olofson case are left to stand unchallenged.

"A government is a body of people, usually, notably ungoverned."
-- Shepherd Book, Firefly, Episode Nine, "War Stories," 2002.
Len Savage, firearms expert and owner of Historic Arms testified at the Olofson trial. Here is his rendition of the facts of the case:

Mr. Olofson, a Drill Instructor in the National Guard, was asked by Robert Kiernicki to teach him how to shoot a firearm. Olofson did and from time to time would let Mr. Kiernicki borrow his oldest AR-15 , go to a public range and target practice. . . (O)n his third time at the range after 120 rounds down range the rifle sputtered three times and jammed. The Law enforcement on the range swept in... The rifle in question seized now by the ATF; It was sent to Firearm Technology Branch (FTB), the testing Arm of the BATFE. They examined and test fired the rifle; then declared it to be "just a rifle". You would think it would all be resolved at this point, this was merely the beginning. The Special Agent in Charge Jody Keeku asked FTB to re-test the firearm and this time use soft primered commercial ammunition.

FTB has no standardized testing procedures, in fact it has no written procedures at all for testing firearms. They had no standard to stick to, and gleefully tried again. The results this time..."a Machinegun". ATF with a self admitted 50% error rate pursued an indictment and Mr. Olofson was charged with "Unlawful transfer of a machinegun". Not possession, not even Robert Kiernicki was charged with possession (who actually possessed the rifle), though the ATF paid Mr. Kiernicki "an undisclosed amount of money" to testify against Mr. Olofson at trial.

At the same time Mr. Olofson was being charged with "Unlawful Transfer" because the rifle malfunctioned and had a M-16 trigger, disconnector, and hammer; calling it an AR-15 with M-16 trigger parts (not the parts that make a machinegun). The ATF removed "a machinegun" from the NFRTR or NFA registry, claiming it was an AR-15 with M-16 parts, therefore NOT "a machinegun". I have the documents, I can prove this. The court was never shown this information. When Mr. Olofson's Attorneys requested the court compel the ATF to provide this and other documents that proved his innocence to the court. The ATF Chief Counsel's Office told the court the documents contained tax information (federal excise tax stamp for $200) and the court was prohibited from seeing them. All documents were kept secret from the Honorable Judge Clevert and the rest of the court. Even the letter from the ATF to the manufacturer of Mr. Olofson's rifle from 1986, which mandated a "safety recall" due to the rifle going "full auto" if it malfunctioned. ATF Chief Counsel told AUSA Haanstad, who then told the court "The Court will have take our word, that the documents in question contain tax information and contain no exculpatory evidence".

It gets even worse... AUSA Haanstad claimed the law does not exempt a malfunction. He claims that it states "any weapon that shoots more than once without manual reloading, per function of the trigger is a machinegun". To clarify when I was on the stand, I asked him "Are you saying if I take my Great Granddaddy's double barrel out and I pull one trigger and both barrels go off, its a machinegun?". He went back to the law (United States Code, Section 5845 (b)), and claims "any weapon that shoots..."
Mr. Savage concludes with this observation:

If your semiautomatic rifle breaks or malfunctions your are now subject to prosecution. That is now a sad FACT. I guess we know now what Senator Kennedy meant when he said he looked forward to working with Mike Sullivan on Gun control issues, after his committee approved him for full Senate vote. To those in the sporting culture who have derided "black guns" and so called "assault weapons"; Your double barreled shotgun is now next up to be seized and you could possibly be prosecuted if the ATF can get it to "fire more than once". Hey, but don't worry. The people testing it have no procedures in writing and the testing will be in secret. Also if you know of information that proves YOUR innocence, maybe the ATF won't claim that it's tax information at your trial and prevent YOUR judge from viewing it. Are you next up on the menu?
(Source: http://redstradingpost.blogspot.com/2008/01/len-savage-duck-hunters-and-sportsman.html)

David Olofson was convicted, despite the facts presented by the defense, on the words of a paid informer and an assistant United States prosecutor who refused to release exculpatory "Brady" material (something he is required to do by Supreme Court decision). There is chance that, if Mr. Olofson is finally able to sustain the costs of an appeal, that this egregious case of ATF and Justice Department misconduct will be overturned. But don't bet on it. What you should be certain of is this: We are now going back, if we ever left it, to the time of Waco Rules. You remember what they are, surely? "We are the avenging angels of the ATF, representing the god-on-earth Imperial Federal Government. If you resist us, we will crush you. If you shoot back at us, we and our big brothers of the FBI will kill you -- we will burn down your house, your church, your family and all you hold dear, AND WE WILL NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE." Those my friends, are Waco Rules. They can do anything you can't stop them from doing.

You see, it doesn't matter what the Supreme Court decides if we have bureaucratic criminals enforcing the law to suit themselves and the purposes of their antigun financial masters, the Democrat-controlled Congress. Do you really think that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi will undertake oversight hearings on ATF abuses? President Hillary, perhaps? This is as likely as George Bush seriously enforcing the immigration laws. The ATF understands this. You should too.

Sheriff Johnny Behan: "You're under arrest!"
Wyatt Earp: "I don't think I'll let you arrest me today, Johnny."
Tombstone, 1993.

Of course, like everything else, the Olofson case is subject to the immutable Law of Unintended Consequences. A reasonable man, observing the outcome of Olofson's case might conclude that there is no point in an honest fellow playing the game of an abusive regime that flaunts the law and manipulates the courts. A reasonable man might conclude that, if he is approached by ATF agents, he should probably consider them as little better than unconstitutional gangsters operating under the fiction of legal pretense. A reasonable man, realizing the system is rigged against him, that the rule of law has broken down and not wishing to go to federal prison for a crime he did not commit, might decide that the best thing to do is refuse to be the victim, right there and then. And you may infer from that whatever you wish.

The Olofson case confirms that we are still living in the time of Waco Rules, so let's not kid ourselves over the maybes of Heller. Supreme Court decisions don't count for spit in the wind to these people. But if the law no longer protects us, it no longer protects them either. Which is something they probably haven't considered, but should, given the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Mike Vanderboegh
PO Box 926
Pinson, AL 35126
GeorgeMason1776@aol.com

Friday, September 05, 2008

Michael Dukes Interview with Len Savage

Click on title link for interview from last February.

The interview with yours truly was posted yesterday, and Michael tells me he's going to start archiving some of his favorites.

I'll probably come up with a post to list all those shows and a sidebar graphic to route people there like I did for "Absolved."

Monday, January 31, 2022

Desperate Men, Desperate Measures

 Nova Scotia Moves Quickly Using Emergency Declaration to Ban Truck Convoys and Highway Cheering, $10,000 Fine For Cheering on Roadway [More]

While Justin runs away and approved media looks away.

[Via Michael G and Len Savage/WRSA]

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Saxby Sidelines Self on Sullivan

Len Savage reports Sen. Saxby Chambliss' aide, Charlie Harman has rejected any action on the Michael Sullivan confirmation with the following excuse:
We have some other issues we are working on. Obviously, there are others who are taking action that is agreeable to you. For now, since this bandwagon is full, we are going to be on the sidelines.
Nuh-uh, senator.

The request is made of you, not your doorman. Tell your impertinent butler or whoever this guy is that this is unacceptable, and your employers are expecting that you will take this expectation seriously.

"The bandwagon is full." Good grief, enough with the excuse-making, as if this will take more than five minutes of your time. You can't "be on the sidelines," senator, without abandoning your most supportive constitutents.

I'm hoping some Georgia gun owners will realize the implications of a continued "Maximum Mike" regime and apply the requisite pressure to let Mr. Chambliss know there will be a price for letting his public-paid servant dictate the agenda to his employers.