Furthermore, I believe the Second Amendment is in the Constitution to provide the last defense of a free people against a tyrannical government. [More]And that's why I'm publicly calling for civil war!
I asked a friend in MT "Is this moron senile or just a career Fudd?"
His response:
Yes.[Via Mack H]
9 comments:
Actually, I prefer the 20 round mags. Easier to carry and don't snag on things as much. So for those idiots that don't like 30 rounders, suggest a smaller package.
This guy is exactly why we have no more need for the NRA. They claim to be gun owners with a heritage dating back to Plymouth Rock, but they'll sell you out in a heartbeat to prove how PC they are. Somebody bring him a UHaul so he can haul his a$$ back to NYC where he belongs. A complete traitor to the gun community.
Wyomarine
By extension, would this same man argue for single shot rifles only?
Does not anyone remember WW2's single shot .45 ACP Liberator pistols designed to fight one's way to a better weapon?
I would fear a 20 round magazine equipped .308 Winchester rifle more than a 20 round magazine in a 9mm Parabellum pistol if the wielder of the rifle or pistol has bad intent.
If someone truly was deranged and/or had bad intent, I would not even let him have a crayon to write with, but that would focus on the capability of the harm potential of the individual, not the tool wielded by the individual.
Beware of anyone who says "I'm a gunowner, but..."
Beat me to it, Ed and Ned.
I'm gonna take the test for certification for my new career, but I wonder why. I don't think I'll be around long to do the work.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/the-anti-gop-threat-in-maine-you-didnt-hear-about/
Charlie Webster has been described as the architect behind the Republican sweep in the November election, and also as an NWO/CFR neocon.
I don't know what "tune" the threatening caller suggests Webster change or catch a .50 BMG round. He didn't specify, at least not in the portion of the recording made available.
A leftist wanting more RINOism? A rightist wanting less? A false-flag psyop to get .50s AND the Tea Party banned?
"But that aside, clips aren't guns and so have no constitutional protection."
Don't know how one can respond to that...
another expert on "clips".
would those be 'paper clips' or 'film clips' or 'hair clips'?
The 2nd Amendment PROTECTS the right to BEAR ARMS - it says nothing about "guns". A magazine fed rifle is nothing but a fancy CLUB without its MAGAZINE. Therefore the magazine, the ammo, as well as the rifle itself, are ALL PROTECTED under the 2nd Amendment as "ARMS".
These "but" monkeys can claim they support our rights, but in the end, they will be more than happy to slide down the slippery slope to a complete ban. My answer is "no".
But, he's credentialed, so of course he must know what he's talking about.
After all, only authorities can speak authoritatively!
Post a Comment