Yeah, nice trick there, portraying heavily-regulated professional wheedlers and suck-ups dependent on the good will of the rulers, and economic fascists doing "business" with governments, which rely on plunder redistribution for all of their financial transactions, as a "free market" model. [More]
What did Mr. Pynchon say?
[Via Florida Guy]
Monday, August 12, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Ok -so the flip side means anyone harmed in a "no-guns-allowed" zone actually have a claim against the liability carrier.
I bet there's a lot of victims, and survivors of victims, who didn't understand who had, and has, the liability.
Now that the insurance wonks have established this fact, it may get a bit interesting for them. If they claim they are liable for any harm due to a legally armed citizen on the premises, they're likewise legally liable for any harm that befalls disarmed individuals.
I hope the victims in Aurora still have time to rope the insurance companies into any potential litigation.
Post a Comment