I've intentionally steered clear of criticizing the Citadel, I've been entirely silent on the associated III Arms project, and I've basically avoided public comment about the irreconcilable differences between Mike and Kerodin. While I have weighed in a couple times on anonymous comments taunting Mike about dying, my point there was about the type of character who would do such a thing and was unrelated to their motivation. Incidentally, I've also not allowed anonymous comments attacking Kerodin to appear on this site, including comments by trolls pretending to be him.
It's no secret I am good friends with Mike, but that's not relevant to my personal assessment of this entire endeavor, at least I try my best not to let it be. Having looked at their publicly-revealed plans, I've determined it's not for me, but the reasons why are unimportant for this discussion. If your informed decision is that this is a place you'd like to invest in, I wish you well. Peaceable people paying their own freight have the right to live wherever and under whatever conditions they choose.
I'd have probably maintained silence, except the whole thing just got
a big boost from Glenn Beck, making it newsworthy and noteworthy, and I have an observation I don't see anyone else making that I think merits further explanation and discussion.
Go to 12:56 in the first video, listen to Beck's question and to the answer he gets.
Q:
Idaho says -- no more open carry. No more even having a gun in the house, we're going to go ahead and do that. What happens then?
A:
The laws of the land will be followed, Idaho as well as the federal laws. Even laws that we believe are unconstitutional. We are not looking to pick a fight with anybody. We would do the best we can to make sure those laws don't pass.
Idaho being unlikely to pass such edicts notwithstanding, since one of the reasons people are attracted to the Citadel in the first place is as protection against SHTF scenarios, and since government has a documented proclivity for exploiting emergencies to impose total control, I think this is appropriate to explore further.
To that end, I'll entertain name-calling-free comments on the specific point raised in the Q&A. Note I'm not interested in assessments of the project itself or of the personalities involved. If the principals don't want to have this discussion here because my being friends with Mike makes me a suspect broker, I'd encourage them to have it somewhere more to their liking.