Too bad. I'd like to see for myself if the military attack aircraft was really tracking recreational family shooters on the ground with a machine gun.
[More]
I'd also like to know what the numbers on the bird were and who was in it. And what the protocol is. And if, after someone with an interest in the matter removed the video from public view, any official inquiry will happen.
Let's see, the U.S. Army is a "
primary user"... and the post says this happened near Salt lake City...
what base do you think this came in from? You know, so they can be asked? Maybe by
someone with constituents and supporters?
As for the comment poster who shrugs it off with "they were just screwing around," I guess
Cooper's rules don't apply in his world.
And as long as I'm free-styling with impressions here, why is it the same feds who took punitive action against the Redskins think it's OK to use "Apache"? Not that I mind in either case, even though
I've been a lifelong "victim" of blatant (and hurtful--don't forget hurtful!) stereotyping, but it just seems a bit contradictory...
[Via Florida Guy]
UPDATE: If there's more that needs to be known about this, at least the right person to find out has been approached:
UPDATE 2: Without knowing, it appears to me the Apache crew were being friendly and giving the folks on the ground a thrill, rather than meaning to intimidate, and it seemed many on the ground got a kick out of it. That said, this is still unsettling to me.
Anon@9:58-- that's one reason I cited Cooper's rules, particularly all guns are always loaded and never point the muzzle at anything you aren't willing to destroy. We've documented lots of mishaps where "trained professionals" were surprised by an ND from an "unloaded" weapon.