Sunday, October 19, 2008

Arms Recovered in Alleged MILF Safehouse

The military recovered an M79 grenade launcher and two rounds of ammunition from an abandoned safehouse reportedly belonging to Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) rebels accused of attacking civilian communities in central Mindanao, a military official said.
Well, now we know why they make 'em wear burkhas...

[Via The Armed Schoolteacher]

Doug Pennington, Boy Genius

"Which risk is more likely: that someone is going to accidentally set off a gun in class and God forbid hit a student, or someone will come in off the highway and start a random shooting spree?" said Doug Pennington, a spokesman for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
What, you mean like this guy, Doug?

Yeah, you're right--only the "Only Ones" are professional enough to carry a gun in a classroom.

Moron.

High School Coach Has Big "But"

I am 100 percent pro gun rights, but...
Oh stop lying. You are not.

And if you don't think there's "a slight chance" that violent attacks can happen anywhere, you're simply ignorant.

Some of us don't care about your "Only Ones" friends, Graham--we've seen and documented too many examples to fall for that fraud.

Your sorry assessment of human nature notwithstanding, you don't get to make the rules for me. You're the only one in control of your reactions. If the sight of an openly armed citizen makes you afraid, that's your phobia. I was recently surrounded by thousands of them, as were many other parents with children, and I couldn't have been less fearful of violence erupting.

We're the Only Ones Technical Enough

The city prosecutor's office here threw out the illegal possession of firearm charge against a scion of a political family here on technical grounds.
Yeah, see, technically, even though he's not an official "Only One," he gets a pass because technically, it's an exclusive club and we take care of our own.

Clear?

Massively Understated

Gun crime 60pc higher than official figures

The true level of gun crime is far higher than the Government admits in official statistics, it can be revealed.

...Figures to be published by the Home Office this week will massively understate the scale of the problem.
Ah, life in Sarah Brady Paradise.

This means one of two things: The UK government is either criminally negligent or they're lying, deliberately and for a focused end purpose.

Why would anyone let either an incompetent or a tyrant disarm him?

I've heard some, more considerate of mainstream trepidations than I am, suggest that if Obama wins we'll lose our gun rights.

Perhaps they will.

Perhaps others will demonstrate the real-world meaning of "Use it or lose it."

From what I'm seeing, the spirit of recognition, resistance and anger in a growing percentage of American gun owners is being massively understated.

[Via Featherless Biped]

Politically Incorrect Guide to Politics

The Economist's Cookbook has embedded all 6 parts of John Stossel's video essay on his site.

Bar Stool Economics

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.

For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Click on the title link for a slide show.

[Via Straightarrow]

This Day in History: October 19

The British surrender their fort at Chambly, Canada.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

See My New Ad?

Over in the left sidebar...It's a click-through to "Cleveland Gun Rights Examiner."

Go ahead and check it out. I'll post some details tomorrow.

We're the Only Ones Who Just Got Tougher Enough

Pennsylvania's gun laws got tougher Friday as Gov. Ed Rendell signed a bill increasing the mandatory sentence for anyone convicted of shooting a firearm at a police officer and for crimes committed with illegally purchased guns.

Rendell signed the wide-reaching bill at the Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Police lodge.
What about if the shooting is defensive? And how about increasing penalties for "Only Ones" unjustifiably shooting citizens (instead of the standard "he did not violate any department policies"?)

And as far as "illegally purchased guns," does that include those bought with money taken via coercion?

I've about had it with the damned self-serving FOP and other public employee unions. Let's fight back and see how they like it when it's their ox being gored. I think it's past time we started demanding a law requiring all police to keep their service weapons locked at their police station when not on duty, with a log record to show them properly checked in and out.

For...the...children...

I Was a Teenage Zombie

"My story is based on fiction," said Poole, who faces a second-degree felony terrorist threatening charge. "It's a fake story. I made it up. I've been working on one of my short stories, (and) the short story they found was about zombies. Yes, it did say a high school. It was about a high school over ran by zombies."

Even so, police say the nature of the story makes it a felony. "Anytime you make any threat or possess matter involving a school or function it's a felony in the state of Kentucky," said Winchester Police detective Steven Caudill.
Gee, detective, I possess all kinds of matter pertaining to schools and their functions, and I even recommend that people ignore the damn law and carry weapons on campuses when their mature judgment as responsible and sovereign citizens tells them doing so would be prudent. Anybody wants to make a felony rap out of that, let's dance.

Here's the thing--I simply don't know enough about this story to judge the merits of whether or not young Poole posed a credible threat. Grandparents calling the cops suggests they were at the end of their tether, but who knows those family dynamics? And who knows if he singled out individuals by name and outlined specific intent?

What should concern us all is the level of evidence--as presented in this news account--arising to the level of a felony prosecution. If they have the kid on a genuine threat against real people, that's one thing. But we need to make sure we're not so paranoid that we overreact and infringe on genuine freedom. And it's up to us to keep tabs on those who might do so in our name.

[Via Cigar Rollers]

Who's Stealing? We're Appropriating

A small software company trying to create a program to help gun dealers comply with federal regulations now believes that the government purposefully stalled and then swiped the technology to create a copycat program of its own.
We briefly touched on this yesterday. Considering what we're dealing with, I'm still not sure why this would surprise anyone. I mean, the whole purpose of BATFU is to mess with people and their property...under threat of armed force.

It would be nice if those government watchdog "Authorized Journalists" outside of conservative media like WorldNetDaily would notice the continual outrages, but, after all, that's why they're authorized.

Looks like we'll have to work without them toward the day when thieves and murderers meet their just fate. Thing is, until that day comes, we've already been told--years ago-- about an electronic authorization system that would still allow for the culling of "prohibited persons" (yeah, I know), but completely eliminate any identifying information on purchases. In other words, it would not create one new requirement, but would actually eliminate any record of who bought what. And the damnedest thing is, it would work.

Not that anybody really cares enough to even give it a serious look...

May the Peace of the Lightworker be with You

"I am not in favor of concealed weapons," Obama said. "I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations."
Not that that surprises anyone who's been paying attention, but The Liberty Sphere provides a source (click on title link).

And of course, once you've trusted yourself into his hands, he can probe your soul (or any other damn place he chooses). All he has to do is get the crowd to keep throwing stones at this woman.

That's one helluva Messiah.

Blessed are the sheep, for they shall be fleeced and slaughtered.

This Day in History: October 18

On October 18, the Americans surrounded Chambly and began the attack with a cannonade barrage on the British stone fort. This alone proved adequately persuasive against the British. Maj. ?? Stopford, commander of the British force inside the fort, surrendered his garrison of 10 officers and 78 enlisted men of the Royal Fusilers. The fort also housed 81 women and children.

The American force confinscated military stuff including 125 stand of British arms, 6 tons of gunpowder, and 6,500 musket cartridges. They also confinscated foodstuffs including 134 barrels of pork, 80 barrels of flour, and s bunch of rice, butter, and peas. The sentimental trophy was the British regimental colors, which was sent to Congress. Conclusion: American Victory

Misfired Police Raid Could Have Ended in Bloodshed

There are times when cops really ought to be kicking in doors.

A hostage-taker threatening the lives of innocents unless he gets what he wants?

Go for it.

A terrorist tinkering with poison gas in his basement workshop for the greater glory of whatever?

Hey, let me loan you a sledge hammer.

An elderly man whose grandson unknowingly bought a hot cell phone?

Not so much.
We want to go home at the end of your shift, too, guys...

Friday, October 17, 2008

So They're Proprietary Software Thieves, Too?

And that would surprise us because...?

[Via "Mr. X"]

No Time for Sergeants

I'd almost forgotten about this post, the noncom who lent his picture in uniform to the IANSA global gun grab effort.

Someone claiming to be him finally replied, and since very few of you go back to read comments to old posts I thought I'd bring them to the forefront:

Anonymous said...
I am retired. I do not have any recent pictures of me out of uniform. Therefore, I am not violating any regulations. Check that if you want, but I am not representing the Army. If I had a picture of me in a Spiderman costume would you be so offended? I think not. So, if I am retired and the picture is a couple of years old, the regulations do not apply to me. That is sufficient an answer as you are going to get regardless of whether you all think you know the regulations or not.
Sincerely, retired Senior Non-Com
10/16/2008 5:05 PM
and
Anonymous said...
You will also note that I do not condone gang members in my former line of endeavor. I want all gun owners to be responsible members of a lawful society. And if you open you eyes you will see on my old uniform that I have the Army Lapel Pin on my lapel. Meaning, I am either a. retired, or have been Honorably discharged. And judging by my former rank, (which I get to keep the title long after I am retired), I am long past my contractual obligations to the Army or the Armed Forces. And you are right, you are just a simple little militant who knows nothing about anything except how to attack persons you should damn well leave alone for voicing their "earned" rights of free speech as opposed to those who feel entitled by birth or racist affiliations. I hope next time you check your facts before you find the NSA at your door asking you questions. You pathetic little turd.
Retire that.
10/16/2008 5:15 PM
I'll reply to the "highlights" such as they are--and let me qualify this by stipulating I have no idea if the anonymous commentator is who he represents himself to be. I'll proceed as if he is.

The Spiderman idea would be completely between you and the copyright holder on the image--although a mask might not be a bad idea.

And the regs do apply to retirees--the section on retirees specifically references the section of the regulations I cited in my original post (see 30-7, pg. 316).

As for: "I want all gun owners to be responsible members of a lawful society."

No problem. The wording of their "5 Golden Rules" ensures that private gun ownership can be disqualified, so all gun owners will be lawful in the IANSA/Control Arms global society you're supporting. That's because all gun owners will be the ones dictating the law. But for the life of me, I can't tell the difference between most of them and the "gang members" you don't condone.

Now we come to me being a "simple little militant" who needs to "damn well leave [you] alone" for "voicing [your] earned right of free speech." Well, that tells me all about you right there, and why you have such affinity for UN-style controls and "human rights," which are dictated, defined and limited by the global body (and thus revocable), and overseen by these enlightened humanitarians.

News flash: This ain't Starship Troopers. I know you consider yourself an "Only One" with special "earned rights," but here they are unalienable, a birthright, endowed by our Creator. No one has authority to tell me I have or haven't earned them. I am entitled.

A uniform alone does not bring honor, considering the likes of Benedict Arnold and Lon Horiuchi once wore one. The military heroes I revere are the ones who bring honor to the uniform, not the other way around. From what I can see, assuming you actually are what you represent yourself to be, you're now bringing disgrace to it.

And what's this race card crap? Is that your way of keeping others from criticizing you for personal deficiencies? That doesn't play here. We defiant gun-owning men and women stand as individuals--the groups we belong to are secondary. Besides, you're the one who appears to be hiding a Hispanic surname from your Control Arms post.

And as for you siccing NSA on me, I learned a long time ago never to make threats I wasn't prepared to back up--it just makes people who do so look like impotent fools, and ones who do so anonymously look even more ridiculous. And you call me a "pathetic little turd"?

Go ahead though. Let's see whatcha got. I've never ducked from a threat of "official" reprisal. Use your awesome connections and dispatch them to my door. I'll have a few questions for them of my own, starting with "Do you have a warrant?"

It's Getting Pretty Deep in Bemidji

Presumably she’ll push more than gun rights... We’d like to think we’re deeper than that.
I know you'd like to think that--but you let the one be gutted and just watch what happens to all the other issues you're so passionate about.

Maslow's hierarchy 'n all that...

Still, where any of your collectivist wish list falls within the legitimate purview of the Executive is beyond me...

You "Authorized Journalist" hacks have a lot of damn gall identifying yourselves with the pioneers.

It's Always Anti-Gunny in Philadelphia

The same Philadelphia City Council members who have challenged the state's supremacy on gun laws introduced two new gun-control bills yesterday, one aimed at closing what critics say is a big loophole in the secondhand gun market...

The other bill introduced yesterday would raise the city penalty for carrying a gun illegally from $300 to $1,900 and would allow police to confiscate a car driven by someone illegally carrying a gun - regardless of ownership of the car.
Can you imagine what the men who once risked everything, to forge a Republic conceived in Liberty, would have thought of these wretched petty tyrants? Right after you told them Independence Hall would one day be a UN World Heritage site?

GunVoter Press Release

Contact Jeff Knox

703-405-1317 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 10, 2008

GUNVOTER.ORG SEEKING AND SHARING CANDIDATE INFORMATION

A new web site, www.GunVoter.org , is seeking assistance from organizations and individuals who have information about state and local candidates in the upcoming elections. Information can be about a single candidate or a list of candidates and links to sources or additional information are encouraged.

GunVoter.org is designed to be a central clearinghouse and repository of information about candidates and legislative matters to help GunVoters cast their votes wisely. Along with areas for comment on federal matters, there are forum areas for each of the 50 states. Anyone can use, read, and post on GunVoter.org and everyone is encouraged to help improve this resource to make it more useful as the 2008 elections draw closer and for future elections.

GunVoter.org is a non-partisan, single-issue, user-driven website and is a project of Neal Knox Associates and The Firearms Coalition.

For more information about GunVoter.org, Neal Knox Associates, and The Firearms Coalition, visit www.GunVoter.org or www.FirearmsCoalition.org .

# # #

For more information about the GunVoter project or to schedule an interview, contact Jeff Knox at 703-405-1317 or by e-mail at Jeff@FirearmsCoalition.org

Another School Shooting

A University of Arizona student fatally shot two men who forced their way into his off-campus home early Thursday, Tucson police said.
Too bad he didn't live ON campus. Then he could be dead, which would serve the purposes of those seeking even more control just fine.

[Via Featherless Biped]

Tell Me a Better Headline Wouldn't Be...

...South Suburban Mom Shoots Garage Intruder

[Via David H]

Reality vs Perception

Other weapons were found in locked premises. It is understood the arms, including a hand gun and rifles, were linked to the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF)...

In May last year, the UVF effectively declared an end to its campaign of violence by announcing the organisation was adopting a non-military and civilian role. Recruitment, military training and targeting had ceased, intelligence rendered obsolete and all guns "put beyond reach".
Peace at last to the Emerald Isle. And I believe in the wee people, too...

The Clever Hans Effect

What's the connection to the 2008 presidential election? Well, much of the media analysis, and even the strategies of the campaigns themselves, is based on the ongoing poll results indicating voter preferences state-by-state and nationwide. But I suspect that we are observing the Clever Hans Effect on a massive scale, and that the polls are in fact unreliable. Worse than "unreliable," actually: they are inaccurate because to some degree they reflect not the honest feelings of the respondents but rather what the pollers want to hear.
Interesting line of thought and analysis here--well worth the read...

[Via Sam W]

This Day in History: October 17

In Wilmington, North Carolina, the colony's Committee of Safety orders the creation and sale of certificates proving one's loyalty to the American cause. To encourage their sale, the committee orders that no business be conducted with any citizen of the county unless they produce one of the certificates.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Trick or Treat

Pumpkin symbol marks sex offenders' homes
The immediate thought strikes that making copies of the sticker and putting it on innocent houses would be a better Halloween prank than soaping windows or TPing. And if the offenders have to leave their lights off, how are people going to see the sign?

Government. Is there anything it doesn't do well?

Supporting Republicans is Racist and Stinky

The marquee supporting the GOP ticket in "an area that is strongly African American was like putting a stink bomb in the middle of the living room," said University of Maryland political Professor Ron Walters.

Brought to you by the party of Tolerance and Diversity...

The Director, African American Leadership Center said it.

I believe it.

That settles it.

I wonder if he'd be equally agreeable to my using the same terms to protest democrat campaign signs in my "strongly white" area...? Or does the fact that I even live in one automatically make me racist?

A Well-Heeled Anti-Gunner


You can almost hear the thought process behind Madonna's red-carpet footwear. "OK, those pesky tabloids won't stop with my whole divorce thing and my film's about to get panned. What can I do to take the heat off? I know - gun shoes! That'll get them talking." [More]

What ought "to get them talking" is the hypocrisy of the Material Gorn, shown here hind-claw in Lagerfeld.

Be funny if she wore these in a locale that bans replica guns and one of her fellow travelers called the snitch line...

It'd also be funny if fashionable Karl had to install bright orange tips in some markets or paint the heels fluorescent in others...

UPDATE: Here's a clearer look...the replica gun heels look pretty realistic--I'll bet if she separated them from the shoe she could knock over a liquor store with them.



And true to form, her PSH partners in citizen disarmament are shocked, shocked...
I am horrified that Madonna can see these shoes as fashion. As a mother herself I would have thought that she would have paused for a second and thought about all the young people here and in her own country that have died because of gun crime. She should have thought about all the young people that have died because of gun crime. We need the whole of society to take responsibility and action in stopping the glamorization of weapons. Celebrities have a massive part to play and an icon like Madonna should have more sense. It’s uncaring. Surely she reads the news and realizes that young people are dying every day.

But here's the thing--the story says she wore them to her movie premiere in New York.

Well, well, well...
These guns will have the FULL ORANGE TIP as required by Federal Law.

In accordance with New York State law, these guns are available for shipment to the state of New York except in New York City.
Somebody call BATFU! Somebody call Furious Mike!

Or is there a different set of laws for rich anti-gun celebrities? (And they say there are no stupid questions...)

Yes, But it's a Rare and Attuned Contempt

I lobbied Barack Obama extensively while he was an Illinois State Senator. As a result of that experience, I know Obama's attitudes toward guns and gun owners better than anyone. The truth be told, in all my years in the Capitol I have never met a legislator who harbors more contempt for the law-abiding firearm owner than does Barack Obama.
Careful there, Mr. Pearson. Considering his exalted status as a Lightworker, "that rare kind of attuned being who...can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet," you're getting awful close to heresy...

[Via Jack A and Lane]

Taking Turns

When he turned, he looked directly at me. Eye to eye. He spoke no words. The look on his face said everything. It seemed to be, 'What will you do? It's your turn now.'
Mike H has a celluloid dream...

Child Gun Deaths on the Rise

The number of justifiable homicides committed by police and private citizens has been rising in the past two years to their highest levels in more than a decade, reflecting a shoot-first philosophy in dealing with crime, say law enforcement analysts.
Bummer. All the li'l tykes were doing was reaching out to find their path...

[Via Plug Nickel Times]

Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of the Lightworker in Vain

A Lufkin woman received a surprise visit from the Secret Service last week because of a "death threat" comment she reportedly made about Sen. Barack Obama to a campaign volunteer asking for her support of the presidential candidate.
All it takes is an unsubstantiated accusation by an acolyte against an infidel?

I didn't expect a kind of Spanish Inquisition...

[Via Tommy S]

Reaching Out to Find His Path

Victor Wells, who runs a program in North Chicago called X-Cons Save Our Kids, said he had been working with Starks and trying to help him find a construction job.

"This was a very bright young man," Wells said. "He was reaching out to find his path in life."

Starks was sent to prison in 2006 for residential burglary and school vandalism. He got a 4-year sentence and was two years into that sentence when he was paroled last month.
Well he couldn't have been too bright. When you reach out, it's generally a good idea not to be pointing a gun at another human being with one hand while you clutch for his money with the other. And while he may not have found his path, he certainly had no trouble finding the pavement.

Based on results, the guy had a gun, had no reservations about initiating force with it and was within shooting range--on top of a demonstrable history of being a sociopathic creep with a criminal record for victimizing others. In other words, a perfect candidate for the Bradys to add to their "Another Child Gun Death" statistics...

[Via Tom H]

This Day in History: October 16

The maritime minister of France sends orders to officials in port towns urging them to prevent American ships from loading war munitions.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Moore to be Prosecuted

City Attorney Bernard A. Pishko said his office will prosecute Hampton resident Dan Moore for trespassing after he was ordered to leave Waterside for wearing a gun on his hip, and, according to police, refused to leave.
This confirms what we broke here last night.

And they're threatening Mr. Moore with "up to a year in jail"? This is clearly official revenge and a conspiracy to deprive a citizen of his rights. What a strutting little piece of...work this punk Pishko is.

I would think if Waterside is a private entity, and it sounds more like one of those fascist "public/private partnerships," someone representing it would need to be the one to order someone to leave--not a police officer. Ditto for filing a complaint.

But here's the funky part:
Pishko said that although Waterside has received millions of dollars of taxpayer dollars in its 25 years, it is a private institution, owned by Waterside Associates, and thus can ban guns.
Yet the Virginia-Pilot reported in March:
The city’s housing authority bought the marketplace from its private owner in early 1999. At the time, Norfolk leaders said they planned to eventually find a private owner and get out of the landlord business.

Nearly 10 years later, the city still owns Waterside, which has become less of a boon to municipal coffers.
Methinks this creature is neither fish nor fowl, but some confounded corporate hybrid and legal labyrinth--and perhaps the technicalities involved can be exploited to advantage. But it's premature to speculate on what should be the purview of a good pitbull attorney.

Still, it's clear the city of Norfolk is intent on playing hardball, and as a side effect, I think they're apt to suffer some unintended consequences in re trying to squelch open carry. Since VCDL is the group with boots on the ground there, I'll take my lead from what they say. If a defense fund is set up, I'll naturally plug it here.

[Via Mack H]

Maggie's Me$$iah

First we had Calypso Louie heralding the coming of The Messiah.

Now we have a privileged political dilettante from Smith College.

My favorite bit of Sophian sophism is her decrying "tax cuts for the rich."

Do you have any idea what it costs to go to Smith? And that doesn't include room and board. Or a year-long stay in Italy...?

Good grief.

A Liberal Gun Grabber

Let me say it straight out: a John McCain presidency would be far worse than a Barack Obama presidency. With a Democrat in the White House, conservatives and Christians suddenly find their principles and are able to offer resistance. Put a Republican in the Oval Office, however, and those same people become blind, deaf, and dumb to most any principle they profess.
I was chided recently for neglecting Chuck Baldwin and the Constitution Party. My critic was right--he is the most faithful candidate on guns. And for those worried he would impose a conservative theocracy, I'd counter that he understands the Constitutional limits of the executive better than the other candidates.

Problem is...well, we know what the problem is.

If nothing else, this oughtta ruffle some GOA-hating prag feathers...

We're the Only Ones Driven Enough

High-tech Onlyonemobiles. Because I guess regular cars aren't good enough, and hey, gotta spend it to justify next year's budget increase, when we can complain about how outgunned and outcarred we are.

I do wonder though--if one of us had one of these, would it magically transmute from a patrol car to an assault car?

[Via David H]

Ethics from the Barrel of a Gun

Mama Liberty writes:
This is one of the best articles I've ever seen on the subject. I thought you'd enjoy it - and maybe the rest of the site...
She's right. Click on the title link and see for yourself.

We're the Only Ones Spraying Easy Off Enough

Dodge Correctional Institution guard who sprayed nephew-inmate gets off easy in Wisconsin
Just when you thought my groaner titles to these things couldn't get any cheesier...

Nice to see the fine line between criminal and "Only One" is so clear here. Assign someone to guard a relative--now there's some brains. What could possibly go wrong?

[Via David H]

Fear and Loathing — Not Hope and Change

Well, that’s nice that Barack Obama’s not going to take Biden’s Beretta shotguns — not that Biden would ever need them, with that armed security detail provided to him by the American taxpayers — but what about my Springfield Armory M1911A1 pistol, or the DPMS AR-type semi-automatic rifle I’d like to have?
Erik Onstott nails it. He also gives us another kind of hope for change. There are some real journalists out there (as opposed to the hollow frauds), ones who are interested in the truth and knowledgeable about what they write. When we find them, let's encourage their publishers and broadcasters to give us more.

A Place for Fear

Lebanon County Judge Robert Eby, who said he also is a gun owner with a concealed weapons permit, said the law required him to return Hain's permit.

But he questioned her judgment, saying she "scared the devil" out of others at the soccer field.

"Fear doesn't belong at a kid's soccer game from any source," Eby said.
The hell it doesn't. The only argument is about who's doing the fearing.

Has the ceremonial robe and illusory trappings of "authoritah" blinded you to the realities of Nature, you cloistered blowhard? I want predators to fear turning soccer fields into killing fields. And I want agents of coercion to fear infringing Liberty.

That kind of fear belongs everywhere.

I suspect when you say you want a place to be fearless, judge, you really mean you don't want the citizens to be.

Tough. Deal with it. You think just because you're a judicial "Only One" that fear of consequences is your sole province?

I'd say good call, but you made it clear you had no choice, and your snotty aside shows you just don't get it-- and that you would have preferred to relegate Ms. Hain to a perpetual state of court-ordered fear.

[Via Mike H]

Qualified Results


49% "Yes," 49% "No," 0% "Not Sure"?

Dear little things, but hopeless at math. D'ya think maybe a blonde designed the poll? (Easy, armed female pals--I'm just having fun with the humorless rape-enabling NOW harridans.)

In the spirit of inflaming the ember of seething resentment into a full-blown shrieking bipolar inferno of rage, may I suggest voting in Palin's favor (click on title link) even if you don't mean it? You know, just for cheap and immature male yucks and in the spirit of CUM ULLA SELLA IN PUGNO TABERNA...?

[Via M. Terry]

This Day in History: October 15

One Sub, one serjt. and twenty-five Rank and File from each of the four Brigades in the Lines, and in Cambridge, to parade to morrow morning at Sun-rise upon Cambridge Common to cut Fire-wood for the army. The Qr. Mr. General or his deputy, will attend upon the common in Cambridge to give directions to the Officer commanding the party.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

BREAKING: Dan Moore to be Prosecuted?

Mack H. has left a new comment on your post "We're the Only Ones Camera-Shy Enough":

The city's Commonwealth's Attorney has told the President of VCDL today that he will in fact prosecute Dan Moore.

I've done a cursory search and can't find outside confirmation yet. I generally would need more to post, but Mack H is a consistently reliable source, so if he tells me something I trust it. Please feel free to enlighten and/or revise as warranted in comments.

A Knob Creek Diary


WarOnGuns regulars know I took the weekend off. I was at Knob Creek. It was great.

I got a chance to finally meet Len Savage and Mike Vanderboegh in person.

Mike brought his in-development manuscript for "Absolved" and shared how the story will continue to unfold and where we'll find ourselves when it "ends." I'll presume to believe you'll really like it. We also talked about strategies for promoting the book and getting it into the hands of the public.

Len was extremely generous and let my son and Mike's daughter shoot several guns. You can tell a lot about a man by watching him exhibit pure joy, and while both kids had a blast, pun intended, it's hard to say who was having more fun.

We knew when we saw it that it would just be a matter of hours before a video about the accident hit the Internet. For those speculating in forum comments, the car explosion and guy on fire were part of a stunt act. What wasn't planned were chunks of metal blasting into the spectators on the front line--they were damned lucky more pieces didn't go flying.

The stunt itself was impressive. Whether it belongs at a shoot I'll leave to others, but based on results it should not have been that close to the crowd. I heard two people were injured and saw one of them--an Ohio gun designer/exhibitor/shooter, wheeled out by the EMTs with his arm temporarily wrapped and blood spatter on his shirt--but all things considered, he was in good spirits and actually joked about it to the people in the bleachers as they rolled him away. I heard the second injured man had broken bones in his hand or wrist, but did not see him. I did see a security guy carry away a hunk of metal that looked to weigh a couple pounds, so the potential for a real negligent tragedy was there.

That said, the incident shouldn't mar enthusiasm to attend future events--I'm sure there's been a lesson learned, and I know I'm looking forward to more shoots now that I've had my first taste.

And here's the thing that struck me more than anything else--here we were surrounded by thousands of hard core gun owners, here we were in the presence of Americans firing machine guns and flame throwers and what-have-you, here we were walking through hundreds of tables filled with militia-suitable hardware most of us can only dream about ever owning, and the major visible "police" presence for most of my time there was guys walking around wearing orange t-shirts, yet I could not imagine a safer place to be. Imagine that--no overt coercion and everybody was behaving themselves.

The "liberal" anti-gun enuretics are so demonstrably full of it--every damn one of them. America's armed-to-the-teeth "extremist" gun owners are the most peaceable people on the planet. Everyone I met and talked to was salt-of-the-earth, nice, interesting, friendly, informed...yeah, I'm sure there must have been some jerks around, but I didn't meet them--and I even made a conscious effort to play "Where's Wintemute?"

I saw nothing but exemplary behavior bolstered with awesome knowledge, safe gun handling...

With all the flash and bang and smoke, it's funny. You'd think that would be what left me with the most visceral reaction, but it's not. What I left there with, more powerfully than my words can convey, is confidence and, to reclaim a word, hope.

We are better than our enemies. Here's to conducting ourselves like we know it.

A Major Benefit

Among the supporters of the proposed ordinance is David Blankenhorn, Pottsville, who said one of his pistols was stolen from him about 20 years ago and police discovered it seven years later.

“It turned up in a drug raid in Auburn. Because I reported it in 24 hours, because I cooperated with the law, I was given that gun back. This ordinance can have a major benefit. If you simply follow the law, it works with you,” Blankenhorn said.
I thought PA had state preemption. And we've been through the self-incrimination exemption for prohibited persons. There would also seem to be a 5th Amendment consideration if your firearm is stolen from your vehicle and you did not have it secured in accordance with state law.

Meanwhile, geniuses like Fudd Blankenhorn here appear too dense to grasp that most of us are going to report stolen property in the hopes of recovery anyway--but criminalizing us--threatening fines, incarceration, and ultimately use of force to coerce compliance--is hardly a "major benefit."

I'm waiting for some sharp and scummy trial lawyer to sue a gun owner reporting a missing gun for negligence, in that they failed to properly secure it from theft--and knew or should have known of the likelihood that it would be used for criminal purposes. The mandated police report ought to give them all the evidence they need.

Meanwhile, Over in Sarah Brady Paradise...

China's weapons laws are among the world's toughest. Its blanket ban on private ownership of rifles, pistols and even gun replicas is a core tenet of social policy...

Yet, these days, reports about gun crimes turn up as often as several times a week even in the tightly controlled state-run media.
Damned American gun shows.

The Philadelphia Klan Terror

Councilman W. Wilson Goode Jr. was unapologetic in City Council yesterday as he addressed a television investigation questioning the work habits of a top employee.

Goode indirectly defended his aide, Latrice Bryant, who last week flashed handwritten signs in Council Chambers comparing a Fox29 news reporter to the Ku Klux Klan. Goode and Bryant are African American; Fox29 reporter Jeff Cole is white.
And we all know that every time a white person displeases a black one, it must be racism at work.

Could someone please tell us what this creature does to make her worth paying basically three times the last census-recorded median household income of Philadelphians in general, and almost 7 times what the average black citizen there receives?

Oh.

$90K/year and vacations to Jamaica? And she's the one being discriminated against?

Y'know, if I'd been caught red-handed falsifying time cards for any of my past employers, they'd have been justified in canning me on the spot and putting my boxed belongings on the curb. I like the way this pampered parasite just throws back entitled attitude and cheapens the experience of every human casualty who was ever actually targeted by the Klan.

Get over yourself, lady. The reporter simply caught you demonstrating your unique brand of ethics, your level of impulse control, and your intelligence. Your offended posturing is an obscene insult to every victim of racist terror and your blame-shifting charges are offensive to every decent human being.

And oh, look--here's her boss's goon strong-arming an "Authorized Journalist."

Yeah, I'll be letting urban thugs dictate the extent of my rights...

Three-Way Action


Just in case you're looking to get screwed by multiple partners and would like to make it a foursome...

If this and this don't put the lie to AHSA being a "pro-gun group," nothing will.

Your Free Speech is What We Say it is

Lawyers for the city of San Francisco told a federal judge Thursday that the city's ban on cigarette sales by pharmacies has nothing to do with free speech.
Perhaps not, but it has everything to do with free conduct.

You'll note in lefty forums a recurring talking points charge that RKBA activists are only interested in the 2nd Amendment and don't care for the rest of the Bill of Rights. We know that's a damned lie and a transparent projection to boot.

Control nazis are just that. They're compelled to control everything.

It's like a disease, and the danger it poses to society in terms of human misery and death should be treated like the epidemic it is. Maybe we should require health warnings on political ads...

A Good Republican

For more than two years, U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan has been consumed by the latest entry on his resume: acting chief of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The Republican has been balancing both jobs while dealing with opposition to his ATF confirmation from members of his own party in the Senate. Now, with the presidential election a month away and Congress adjourned, Sullivan, 54, could soon end up unemployed.
What--there's no demand for breaking up rocks or making license plates, you know, kind of a Big Tent to Big House transition...?

And here's a scary thought:
At various times, he's been talked about in state Republican circles as a possible candidate for governor, state attorney general and the U.S. Senate.
Yeah, maybe a John Kerry/Ted Kennedy/Brady Campaign endorsement will clinch it for him.

Good thing the Republicans can also count on gun owners.

[Via "Mr. X"]

Pilot Error

The classic and well-worn illustration is that it is irresponsible - not to mention illegal - to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater, though the right to free speech is one of America's most cherished. The reason for the prohibition is that people might be hurt in a stampede to escape.
The Virginia-Pilot said it, I believe it, that settles it.

Stuff it, you despicable police state-demanding cowards. You can yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater--there is no prior restraint.

And yeah, right. As we've seen time and again, only the "Only Ones" can be trusted to bear arms without making us regurgitate our cuds. Leave it to effete Orwellian wimps to redefine responsibility as irresponsibility. That way, those who insist on everyone being a potential victim are the responsible ones.

I guess if they repeat that lie enough, they can look in the mirror and deem themselves, if not self-determining men, at least house slaves, and thus superior to the rougher ones in the field.

[Via Mack H]

A Crisis in Worcester

But in the past 18 months, in this city of 176,000, bullets and bare knuckles have given way to 4- or 5- or 6-inch blades. The use of knives in crimes is up 9.5 percent to 231 instances, through Aug. 31, compared with the same period in 2007, while the use of guns in crimes fell 16.8 percent to 94 instances in the same period, according to Worcester police.
So now knives are the "weapons of choice"? It's tough keeping up--the choice keeps changing so much.

No matter. Disregarding for a moment all that Massachusetts knife control, and factoring in the inescapable conclusion that attacking people with knives is illegal, you have to ask yourself why, for all intents and purposes, possession of personal defense tools of choice is forbidden to We the People. Especially when the authorities disclose such detailed knowledge of predator armament and capabilities, and not a one of them takes responsibility for anyone's safety.

[Via John G]

A Culpeper Encounter

The link is to the latest VCDL Alert. Read the whole thing, but I'm calling specific attention to item 6:

Good for the officer. But who's the pseudo "Only One"? Damned incompetent rent-a-cop helmet nazi has no business--not to mention authority--to be accosting citizens for having the means of defense.

Expose the boob for the Acton's Law illustration he is, and do it by name. Put a personal cost on wrongful detaining and harassment.

We can pity the mentally challenged, but we damn sure have no obligation to let them abridge our liberties.

[Via Jeffersonian]

We're the Only Ones Camera-Shy Enough

Turn the camera off.
By what authority?

And understand when an "Only One" gives an order, he's prepared to escalate force to whatever extent he sees fit to execute it.

Who is this thug?

[Via Jeffersonian and Mack H]

Vanderboegh: An Open Letter to Mary Mitchell (And Other Antigun Politicians and Journalists of Her Ilk).

Mary Mitchell
Columnist, Chicago Sun Times

re: "What Keeps Obama Safe Could Protect the Rest of Us," CST, 12 October 2008

My dear Ms. Mitchell,

If I may, I would like to introduce you to the Law of Unintended Consequences and to Tomoslav Mitrovic. First, let me recap what I understand from your modest proposal to turn Chicago into a police state. I will assume that the limits of your tyrannical appetite are found at the geographical borders of "Shortshanks" Daley's dysfunctional Democratic paradise, but if they do not then what I have to say is even more true.

You recount approvingly the overwhelming police presence now guarding the sacred manse of Barack H. Obama -- the roadblocks, the personnel barricades, the invasive searches of pedestrians walking on public streets, the forced showing of identity cards. "Ausweiss, bitte. Ja?"

Most importantly, you believe that because the only firearms in this utopia are those belonging to the approved minions of the state, you are therefore safe AND you wish this "safety zone" to be extended as far as possible.

You pass over the right of citizens in Obama's gun-free Eden to possess firearms in their own homes, or their right to take such property to and from their dwellings. You are silent on whether the Fourth Amendment still applies to homeowners with firearms within the Golden Circle of the Lightworker's Enfolding Arms of Officially Sanctioned Violence. You are equally silent on how many cops and troops it would take to expand Obama's little cone of safety to the entire city of Chicago. What would the ratio of cops to citizens they are oppressing, uh, excuse me, "protecting," be? One in ten? One in twenty? For all three shifts, twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, fifty two weeks a year? How exactly can the rest of us afford to pay for the costs of our own oppression, er, "safety"?

No matter.

Your sneering reference to Alaska suggests that you understand that there are other areas of the country where your proposal would not find favor. Indeed, I think even you understand that there are places where men and women consider themselves free individual citizens and not government-cared-for sheep and who would resist your proposal violently. The fact that for such a tyrannical proposal as yours to be "legal" (not to say constitutional), federal laws would have to be passed to ensure it -- and thus extended to the rest of us unwillingly -- indicates to me that for all your metropolitan sophistication you have not heard of the Law of Unintended Consequences, a law which can neither be repealed nor amended. Nor it seems have you heard of Tomoslav Mitrovic.

At the time of his death in 1999, Tomi Mitrovic was sixty years old. He lived in Belgrade with his wife Lila and he had two daughters, Ivana and Jelena, a grandson, Kosta and an informally adopted son, Dejan, the grown child of his best friend, who had died years before. He was known as an easygoing man, a salt-of-the-earth type who loved America. Said his son later, ''He built himself an American house, and everyone joked about it, but they admired it. He built a ranch house, with three bedrooms and three bathrooms. He saw it somewhere and he liked it, so he built one.'' Tomi even cut his yard short in the American style. He also kept a couple of cats and a stray dog that appeared one day and never left.

Tomoslav Mitrovic was a program director for Radio Television Serbia, the state-run broadcaster that gave the news as Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic wanted it given. Said his son, ''He was just one of the people working there. He had no influence on the programs or on Milosevic. He just switched the cameras and the programs from channel to channel. He was a professional. He worked for his salary. If the political opposition ran the station, he'd work for them, too.''

Tomi worked the night shift on the 22-23 April 1999. Everybody knew that the station might be hit by NATO airstrikes so Mitrovic sent the rest of his own crew home and did the job by himself. He was there when one of several American-made air-to-ground precision guided missiles came in the window and blew him to pieces. He was one year from retirement. The missiles had been sent by Bill Clinton to silence what his Pentagon spokesman Kenneth Bacon called "as much a part of Milosevic's murder machine as his military." Also killed along with Tomi were some twenty-odd video mixers, broadcast technicians, security guards and make-up artists. War criminals all, no doubt.

The attack was seen at the time for what it was: the deliberate widening of the rules of war to include the media and journalists who supported the war effort of an opposing regime. Tony Blair insisted that the bombing was justified since the station was part of the "apparatus of dictatorship." One of his cabinet ministers, Clare Short, said, "This is a war, this is a serious conflict, untold horrors are being done. The propaganda machine is prolonging the war and it's a legitimate target."

Journalists of every stripe condemned the attack. As Robert Leavitt associate director of the New York University's Center for War, Peace and the News Media said, "It really creates a dangerous precedent with regard to freedom of the press. Once we start defining journalists as legitimate targets, it becomes very hard for us to criticize any other attacks on media, including those of Milosevic himself on his own independent media. . . This is really crossing a dangerous line."

For his part, speaking of the Serbian atrocities against the Kosovars, Bill Clinton said this in a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars after the strike on the television station: "Political leaders do this kind of thing. (Do you) think the Germans would have perpetrated the Holocaust on their own without Hitler? Was there something in the history of the German race that made them do this? No. We got to -- we got to get straight about this. This is something political leaders do. And if people make decisions to do these kinds of things, other people can make decisions to stop them. And if the resources are properly arrayed, it can be done. And that is exactly what we intend to do."

So, before we go on to how this impacts you, let's be clear about what Bill Clinton did. He expanded the American military's rules of engagement to include the politicians whose decisions start and prolong the wars, and the journalists who support them. And, having expanded the rules, he tried his best to kill as many Serbian journalists and politicians as possible in order to achieve what he felt was the common good for the former Yugoslavia, whether they liked it or not. Those expanded rules still apply today.

So here we are with a new President about to take office who, given the anti-firearms record that he is loudly denying at the moment, will see eye-to-eye with you on gun control, street control, talk-radio control, Internet control, people control and God-knows-what-else control in the New Perfect Paradise Nanny State led by the Lightworker Saint Barack. Yet even you must admit that there are people like me who would resist any more encroachments upon our God-given constitutional liberties. How do you think we would react to such an oppressive scheme as your own? Remember, we're the ones with the firearms.

I tell you, madame, we will fight. The Law of Unintended Consequences as applied to Bill Clinton's stupid advancement of the rules of war to include politicians and journalists will ensure that another American civil war will see the deaths of many innocents and many who are not so innocent. This will include, if I may be permitted to put a fine point on it, American politicians and journalists who attempted to push tyrannical schemes on their fellow citizens. And if you think that civil war cannot come to this country you are whistling past the graveyard of history. We are more divided as a people now than we ever were in 1860. In our opinion, this time it is the "liberals" such as yourselves who are pushing slavery. And we will not consent to be slaves of your nanny state, no matter how well-intentioned you believe your tyranny to be.

You may not think of yourself as a part of what Clare Short called "the propaganda machine" nor as a "legitimate target" of war, but surely even you would admit there are others who may have a different opinion, and who may react accordingly if your well-intentioned push comes to tyrannical shove.

When they buried Tomislav Mitrovic, a Serbian fan of all things American who was ironically killed by an American missile, in the Topcider cemetery of Belgrade in the spring of 1999, he was mourned by hundreds, yet he was just one out of thousands of dead in that conflict. As his son said, "He was guilty of nothing." In fact, he was guilty only of being an unintended victim of the Law of Unintended Consequences, as invoked by William Jefferson Clinton.

I beg of you, Mary Mitchell, be careful what you wish for. You and we, like Tomislav Mitrovic, may get it.

Mike Vanderboegh
PO Box 926
Pinson, AL 35126

PS And if your real intention is to stop street crime, you might try allowing the law-abiding to carry concealed weapons. The bad guys don't prey on victims unless they are reasonably sure they can't fight back.

[Related Post]

A Follow-Up Request

We spoke yesterday of helping Wayne Fincher materially. Paul W. Davis reminds me of one other thing that is just as important:
If you could, would you drop Wayne a note and encourage him. He is discouraged and feels very cut-off from everything. I spent Friday evening, part of Saturday, and again part of Sunday encouraging Miss Linda and Wayne to stay on course.Friday, Wayne was ready to give up and do it all pro se, which would be a disaster. He looked at the amount of money it is going to take...and was at the point of losing all hope.
Please send correspondence to:
Hollis Wayne Fincher
07863-010
P.O. Box 9000
Forrest City, Arkansas
72336

Guest Editorial: Force, Liberty and the Potential of the Third Party Vote

by Charles H. Sawders

The future of this nation will be settled by force. Make no mistake about that. Either the public will be victorious through the ability to muster the most force, or not enough will participate and state force will prevail. Or the public will only resist verbally and acquiesce to the threat of state force.

Either way, the issue will be settled by force. If McCain wins, the usurpation of citizen rights will be much slower and much more subtle, thus making the possibility of non-resistance in any effective manner less likely. For, by the time the public awakes, they will no longer have the wherewithal to resist actively and most probably not even the right to speak in opposition. Remember it was McCain who partnered with Russ Feingold to prohibit the exercise of free speech within sixty days of an election. This does not auger well for his future actions as our president, since he has already shown a willingness to deny the second most important right guaranteed under the Bill of Rights. He has also stated publicly and voted to place ever more infringement on the most important right guaranteed in that magnificent document, the right to keep and bear arms, the one which the second amendment states unequivocally "shall not be infringed". The end game under McCain will probably not be realized in his tenure, even if he were to serve two terms, but the pattern will be set and irrevocable. His pattern doesn't just suggest an antipathy to individual "unalienable rights" it proclaims such, loud and clear.

If Obama wins, I expect the exact same problems. The only difference will be the accelerated timetable for accomplishment of the total subjugation of the American citizen. This acceleration may just be noticeable enough to the average non-involved, non-interested citizen to make him notice and become involved. While he still has the tools to resist!

So, when one says a vote for a write-in candidate or third party candidate is a wasted vote, I say it is a moot point as to the general direction of this society. Such a movement, should it prove widespread could possibly, but not probably, result in at least a suspension of the plans of power mongers, if not a downright abandonment of them. Power mongers never abandon their quest to rule others. That is why "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." But eternal vigilance does no good without the will to act, except as to note at what point one has surrendered his life's service to the whim of another.

A large enough loss of formerly reliable votes to other than the two main candidates may just return the political parties closer to the ideals and principles held by the majority of Americans and codified in our constitution. The outcome of the election will probably not be changed by such action, but neither party can be sure how many of the lost votes would have ordinarily been theirs. Of necessity each major political party would be forced to wonder about ever larger desertions in future elections. This can't help but be a better consideration than the American citizen is now receiving. It could possibly lead to a renewed effort to woo the American voter by each party in the hopes of staving off political suicide.

Potential force in the service of liberty is preferable to kinetic force. But the decision is not ours to make, it will be made by those who view us as livestock, disposable commodities to be utilized for maximum profit of the herdsmen. Therefore any indication of the weakening of resolve to remain free will be seen as a signal by those people to proceed.

Voting third party, or write-in should be considered a rejection of both our primary choices, by them if they be capable of rational analysis, and could possibly serve as a warning, thereby avoiding or postponing the application of kinetic force. Make no mistake that kinetic force will be used by the state under either of these candidates if they perceive a lack of will to respond in kind by the public. This application of kinetic force would most probably occur in response to civil disobedience and/or peaceful protest to finally remove them from the arsenal of the citizenry and gain a much more compliant populace.

Worse than the above statement is that there could be no more damning indictment of the American character than if the state need not apply kinetic force, but through threat and isolated example of kinetic force achieve their goals by only the application of potential force on the majority of the American public. That would mean the tables have been completely reversed, because it is the potential for the application of kinetic force by the public that restrained the state up to now. In this instant turnabout is not fair play, because the rightful object of any free state is to serve at the will of the people and not the other way around.

For more than 200 years, the issue has been settled by force. But thanks to the founders we only had to rely on potential force. The public ability to actively resist and their known willingness to do so, has served as a brake on the ambitions of our would-be masters. Should we surrender that, as it seems most Americans are now willing to do, mistakenly, in the name of "public safety", the likely machinations of either of these presidential candidates will most certainly require the public's ability to transition potential force into kinetic force.

We have already seen this dynamic in civilian law enforcement by civilian policing forces. One need only read a little news each day to see accounts of atrocities committed by our policing forces on innocents and misidentified persons and property with absolutely no consequences for the malefactors in blue uniform.

Just recently the Army has designated a brigade for use in civilian law enforcement, emergency response and "crowd control" while stationed on dwell time in the continental U.S. (CONUS), with an eye to continuing this with other brigades as duty rotations take place. The 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team, to be exact per the Army Times. If the over all command structure is pleased with the results of one brigade thusly employed, the practice is certain to expand, both in number of units employed and added tasks (mission creep).

We have an all volunteer military now. That means that many of the people in armed service of the nation are careerists. Careerists only advance by pleasing their superiors in the hierarchy of the organization, this applies to all organizations. Never in history has liberty survived in a society where the military became the civil police force. Not once, not in any nation, throughout history has liberty survived just such an arrangement. The reasons are simple.

A nation's military is under the over-all command of people farthest removed from the realities and principles of the majority of the people of their nation. Whether those people be a president, premier, junta, tribunal, politburo or something else, they are at the farthest remove from the populace. When they control a police force, it is also at a much farther remove than local policing agencies which are answerable more directly to the public either through political pressures put upon local politicians to manage that police force appropriately, or through court actions. This cannot happen when the military becomes the police force for a nation. And it never has. Our civil law enforcement agencies are almost beyond control now, how much worse would it be if instead of a city, county or state matter, recourse was not even possible at any level poised to respond to the people of a particular locality?

In summary voting one's conscience is never a wasted vote. In this particular election a vote means less than it ever has as to the assertion of the public will. Ergo, I cannot adhere to the philosophy that "He's a sonofabitch, but he might be our sonofabitch."

It is time to warn all sonsofbitches and rid ourselves of them. Peacefully, if possible, otherwise, if not.

This Day in History: October 14

In London, Secretary of State Lord Suffolk receives intelligence that the colony of Pennsylvania is preparing an armed fleet and floating batteries to prevent the passage of the King's ships through the Delaware River. He recommends that the Admiralty dispatch vessels to destroy the floating batteries.

Monday, October 13, 2008

We're the Only Ones Revoking Enough

The Sheriff's Department has begun the process of revoking hundreds of concealed weapon permits across Orange County.
Because, as your owner, Sandra Hutchens is the "Only One" empowered to determine if your life is worth defending. At least until you realize that you are and do something about it.

[Via Mama Liberty]

We're the Only Ones Probed Enough

An NYPD officer and a retired cop are at the center of a federal probe into a violent crew that allegedly robbed and kidnapped drug dealers.
Cool. And being Bloomberg Bullies, they have that "Only Ones" no finger-lifting advantage.

[Via Jack A]

Knotheads of the Round Table

Crimes involving assault weapons have become so common that police officials across the nation are discussing how to contain the national problem, Sheriff Kevin Beary said this week. "We need to have a round-table with the Police Executive Research Foundation to get some answers," he said.
Yeah, you have your executive round table, Kevin. But if you're looking for answers that involve banning militia-suitable weaponry, I can save you some time:

No.

Your move.

Oh, and great job there showing some perspective on semiautos, "Authorized Journalist" Henry Pierson Curtis.

[Via Lane]

We're the Only Ones "A Few Bad Apples" Enough

One in three recent Atlanta Police Academy graduates have criminal records...
But becoming "Only Ones" magically makes them more trustworthy to openly carry than you and me.

[Via Mike Vanderboegh and John G]

Mary Mitchell's America

Obama's neighbors have been forced to give up certain of their personal freedoms in order to ensure his safety...

There's no telling how many guns would be taken off the street in gang- and drug-plagued neighborhoods if police were to set up roadblocks and search everyone going into those areas.

For those of you who argue that what I am proposing violates basic civil rights, forget it...

This is Chicago, not Alaska.
There's a solution: Constitution-free zones.

Mary Mitchell's America is a police state.

I notice she acknowledged force was used. I note she says "Forget it" for any rights-based disagreement, removing any will but hers from the decision.

How many men who disagree is Mary willing to see destroyed to enact her totalitarian agenda? Anybody not think creatures just like her enabled killing fields?

This wretched harridan is nothing less than a domestic enemy. The Chicago Sun-Times, which gives her a platform, is an instrument of subversion.

Anyone who thinks such as these will ever allow us to peacefully coexist is a fool.

[Via HZ]

We're the Only Ones Hot Dogging Enough

A Coral Springs police officer whose K-9 dog suffocated inside his police car last summer will not be charged, authorities said today...

The officer, whose name has not been released because he works undercover, remains on duty at the Police Department.
Well, I guess as long as it wasn't willful...

[Via Leo G]

[More from The Only Ones Files]

Meanwhile, Back Over in Across-the-Pond Paradise...

A British gardener’s local council has ordered him to remove a 3-foot high barbed wire fence around his property in case thieves hurt themselves on it...
Just close your eyes and think of England...

[Via Jeffersonian]

We're the Pseudo-Only Ones Preferred Parking Enough

First a Cook County sheriff's officer was nabbed parking his squad car illegally in a disabled parking spot.

Now a volunteer with Palos Hills Emergency Disaster Agency has been snapped trying to pull the same stunt in a marked city vehicle...

"Just because she had a cop car, or what looked like a cop car, she doesn't get to break the rules...

"She denied it and said, 'No I didn't,' but I told her I saw her," Wall said. "She's supposed to be enforcing the rules, not breaking them."
Acton's Law in action, with denials and everything...

Give a little person a little power and before you know it, they're acting just like a real "Only One."

[Via David H]

Wayne Fincher Fundraising Appeal

We have reached a point in the case of U.S. v. Hollis Wayne Fincher where we must once again ask you to consider supporting Wayne and his fight for our Second Amendment rights. As you may know, Wayne lost on appeal to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, and a Petition for Rehearing was filed requesting that the entire 8th Circuit rehear the appeal. As you may also know, the 8th Circuit summarily dismissed the Petition for Rehearing.
Read the whole thing.
To support Wayne and your Second Amendment rights please send checks to:

The Wayne Fincher Defense Fund
P.O. Box 215
Elkins Arkansas 72727

This Day in History: October 13

On Friday, October 13, 1775, meeting in Philadelphia, the Continental Congress voted to fit out two sailing vessels, armed with ten carriage guns, as well as swivel guns, and manned by crews of eighty, and to send them out on a cruise of three months to intercept transports carrying munitions and stores to the British army in America. This was the original legislation out of which the Continental Navy grew and as such constitutes the birth certificate of the navy.

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Downtime

For WarOnGuns, that is.

I'm taking a long weekend off, starting now. I should be posting again some time Monday.

I'd appreciate it if those of you who email me could hold off until then--otherwise the buildup will be a real bear to deal with.

Oh, and I'm turning off comments until I start back up--spammers and trolls, you know...

We're the Only Ones Misusing Enough

A Zanesville city corrections officer faces a misdemeanor charge of improperly handling a weapon in a motor vehicle...

Investigating deputies said they found a loaded .45-caliber pistol behind the driver's seat underneath a piece of paper. One spent cartridge was located on the front floor of the driver's side seat....
Let's see, drinking, crashing, fleeing the scene, trying to think up an elaborate lie about the car being stolen---and no, I have no idea how that shell got there or how the acci9dent happened. And oh, yeah--a deer made me swerve.

Sounds like a great proto-"Only One" you've raised there, Chief. Can't wait for him to start filling out police reports and testifying against defendants...

Gun-Hating Martha Rosenberg Down to Only Trick

It must be that time of month again--Martha is bleeding all over the Internet.

But that boring, foot-stomping indignant shrew isn't what I want to talk about. Check out the comments. Gotta say it cracks me up to see Rady Ananda pass herself off as someone who "favor[s] the Second Amendment" in a transparent attempt to plug AHSA.

Go ahead Rady, tell us all about your gun advocacy.

No Surprise

Police Capt. Mark W. Louney said residents from several places in the city called to get unwanted firearms out of their houses.

“They just didn’t want them around anymore,” he said. “I was kind of surprised we recovered so many.”
I wish I could say I was surprised. Sadly, from many I expect it.

And then they're going to destroy them.

No surprise there, either.

[Via Brian F]

We're the Only Ones "Wedding Crashers" Enough

Police have begun an internal investigation of a weekend confrontation between police and members of a wedding party that led to the arrest of Astros pitcher Brandon Backe.

Witnesses said Monday that police needlessly beat, Tasered and pepper-sprayed wedding guests who were trying to comply with police commands during an incident in which officers arrested 10 people, including Backe, at an outdoor bar at the San Luis Hotel on Seawall Boulevard.
I always cry at weddings. Especially with my eyes full of Oleoresin Capsicum.

Here's the light bulb-going-on moment:
"You will feel the most helpless, humiliated, betrayed, that you will ever feel."
Bingo. And doesn't that sound like a great slogan for another "Only Ones" commemorative t-shirt?

[Via Jeffersonian]

NRA to Make Major Election Announcement

The National Rifle Association’s (NRA) Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre and NRA Political Victory Fund (NRA-PVF) Chairman Chris W. Cox will be traveling to Pittsburgh, Pa., Springfield, Mo., Colorado Springs, Colo. and Reno, Nev. Thursday, October 9 for a series of press conferences where they will make a very important announcement regarding the 2008 Presidential elections.

Taking bets here...


UPDATE:
A-yup.

2008 Candidate Ratings Guide

From Gun Owners of America...

[Via Jeffersonian]

The Turkey Running Harvard Business School

No, not the Dean. A real turkey.

Don't you just love the way the law--its only legitimate purpose being to secure the blessings of liberty--puts our modern day heirs of liberty at a disadvantage against...the main course? The Zargonians must have landed in Cambridge, and there's gotta be some pod people action going on there...

I also like "Mike," who "do[es] security." He seems an affable enough fellow, but I question his powers of observation, not even knowing that the subject of his protective focus is a "she," not a "he." I also question how effective he would be if a true ravening predator stalked in and began culling witless, tender gobblers...

What is it about Massachusetts and turkeys, anyway...?

[Via Illspirit]

Defiance

'Defiance’ is based on a true story, three Jewish brothers (Daniel Craig, Jamie Bell and Liev Schreiber) escape Nazi-occupied Poland and head into the forest to join Russian resistance fighters and try to save the lives of other Jews.
Watch the trailer. Then ask yourself how the idiot can be anti-gun in real life.

Most actors truly are stage props.

[Via Crotalus]

We're the Only Ones Not Doing Our Jobs Enough

As the nationwide mortgage crisis puts the squeeze on homeowners, the Cook County sheriff's office is on pace to evict more people than ever from foreclosed homes.

At least it was until Wednesday, when Sheriff Tom Dart announced he wouldn't do it anymore.

...By refusing to do any foreclosure-related evictions, the hope is that banks will change their policies.
That's the purview of Cook County "Only Ones"? Their opinion on "social justice" decides what's enforceable?

If so, can we count on Sheriff Dart to immediately disband the Eviction, Levy & Warrant Unit, and return their funding to the county? And if he expects private entities to handle their own evictions, will he also turn a blind eye to property owners/agents arming to protect themselves against hostile and emotional evictees? Or if not, also admit that his people don't need that precaution either?

Note this is not commentary on the housing/lending mess, its causes or its solutions. That's a whole 'nother area you'd do well to keep informed on, but it's not my focus here.

[Via Lane]

This Day in History: October 9

The 2nd New Jersey Regiment was raised, on October 9, 1775, at Trenton, New Jersey for service with the Continental Army under the command of Colonel William Maxwell. The regiment would see action at the Battle of Trois-Rivières,Battle of Valcour Island, Battle of Brandywine, Battle of Germantown, Battle of Crooked Billet, Battle of Monmouth, Sullivan Expedition, Battle of Springfield and the Battle of Yorktown.