Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Five-Minute Activism

Kurt has a new column, about how "our 'men' in the gun ban camp," the hissy-fitters at CSGV, are trying to do a "grassroots" blitz against a politician who rejected demands for background checks as "extreme."

Here's the five-minute activism assignment for today:

Please read and share the link to Kurt's column, which contains contact info for Senator Heitkamp and do just that.

Come on. Five minutes.

Meanwhile, South of the Border, Down Mexico Way

A brutal pack of wild feral dogs is being blamed for mauling four people to death in a Mexico City park - including toddler who was found partially eaten and a young woman whose arm was torn off. [More]
Thank goodness no one was killed with a gun!

[Via DMJ. No animals were harmed in the production of this blog post.]

Poisoning Minds

Looks like someone on the Hill is not a Freedom Feens fan.  [More]

Keep that poison flowing, guys.

Dang it! I just scrolled down and saw that's the exact same thing Mama Liberty said to them!

Win Fabulous Prizes!

The Weapon Blog presents another month's list of gun-related contests. [Read]

Radio Flyers

Here are  my appearances over the past few days:
I was also on "Diggin' with Dayton" Saturday morning out of Panama City, FL, but they don't seem to have that archived.  Plus I have another gig lined up for tomorrow, but I'll post about that then.

Victory Garden

Whose property is it, anyway? [Read]

Brady, The Next Generation

John Richardson says "You knew this was coming." [More]

Restoration, not Revolution

Then - and only at this point - what must take place is a restoration of Constitutional law and order. [More] 
Or as Mike says, "No Fort Sumters."

The true "American Revolution" wasn't the War of the Rebellion anyway.

NRA 'inhibiting' political agenda, not 'medical research'

And we've seen how media outlets stumping for "gun control" carry the administration's water and it's talking points, again, and again and again, In a further overt display of confidence and arrogance, the "Authorized Journalists" aren't even hiding the fact that Nancy Pelosi is feeding them the terms they will be coordinating on to create the sanctioned meme. All pretenses of impartiality, lack of bias, journalistic integrity, being a "free press" and guarding the public interest as"government watchdogs" have been cast aside as the Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists proudly adopt the mantle of Official Propaganda Corps (just don't ask Obama to pronounce it), or more appropriately, Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda. [More] 
Today's Gun Rights Examiner rebuttal exposes sins of omission -- by the Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists, and more insidiously, by apathetic gun owners who refuse to lift a finger, even now.

Rule II in Action

I guess Furious Mike is "willing to destroy" Ray. [More]

We're Number One!

California wants to keep its place as the #1 Brady Showpiece State. [Read] 

Take that, New Jersey and  Illinois!
 
[Via Dave Licht]

Another Gun Owner Map Published

This time in Texas. [More]

It reminds me of something I wrote a long time back in response to an anti saying they wanted to know who had guns: Assume we all do. And conduct yourself accordingly.

[Via Rick Oltman]

Death By a Thousand #Cuts

If #cutforbieber being a "trend" doesn't guarantee Western civilization's collapse, whatever will can't be all that far off. Perhaps the fact that there are Twitter "trends" to begin with?

Seriously? Girls cutting themselves because a teenybopper "idol" smoked pot? More seriously? Bleeding hearts chastising anyone making fun of that?

Meanwhile, setting religious sensibilities aside for a moment, the Caliphate setting up the occupation of Piersland would love to see more "men" like this.

Sure are a lot of MREs (Morons, Ready to Eat) out there.  I guess having a plethora of softer targets will encourage the jackals to deplete the supply before testing the resolve of the fortified.

This Day in History: January 8

[More]

Monday, January 07, 2013

Mental health ‘reforms’ could cast ‘blanket dragnet’ for gun rights disabilities

"We actually need to go on the offensive, move to roll back some of this to promote human rights and public safety, restore gun and carry rights to decent people who can contribute to civilian mutual defense," he advocated. "And we need to fight any extension of this sort of thing. [More]
This evening's Gun Rights Examiner commentary identifies a very likely threat that we must not allow a preemptive surrender on...

A Giant Gaping Hole

In the end, it may well turn out that knowing what kinds of guns he used isn’t nearly as important as what kind of drugs he used. [More]
True, but it would also be easy to ignore if these medicines do good for some and look at what the attributable violence percentages are before enacting anecdote-based "solutions."

This needs to be something that is rigorously studied, and that does not lend itself to a quick fix. But yes, by all means, give it scrutiny, just make sure it's scientific and not agenda-driven.

[Via Brian P]

Great Expectations

The Captain's Journal has some. [Read]

And the Problem Is?

But on Sunday, newly sworn-in Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat from North Dakota, called the reported proposals "way in the extreme" and cautioned that they would not pass if brought together in a comprehensive bill. [More]
Good. Let their overconfidence be their undoing.

[Via DMJ]

A Suicide Pact

The head of the state's largest teachers' union said she expects her board to take an official position against proposals that would allow teachers to carry guns. [More] 
That's actually fine with me as long as they have no say over the rest of us. Anyone dumb enough to support this is probably too selfish, stupid and cowardly to be trusted with a gun anyway.

Who Will Protect Us from Our Protectors?

Sipsey Street Exclusive: Thomas Nee, key member of Joe Biden's "gun violence commission," has a son who was convicted of plotting a Columbine-style mass murder at a school -- possibly with a service weapon obtained from his father. [Read] 
Well, if Mr. Nee wants me to disarm, that's different!

A Model Republican

This ass Deukmejian is the perfect example of the Benedict Arnold branch of the party, and after decades, he's still being used as a handy tool by his ostensible "opposition." [Read]

The Republicans need to understand: A betrayal will cost them their seat. It's been done before, and I'll be explaining more about that in the coming days.

Ultimately, you won't lose your gun rights unless you surrender them, and the Second Amendment will mean what we with guns say it does.

With all the noise being thrown at us, and all the threats, with the climate of hysteria, it would be easy to give in to fear.  Your enemies are counting on that, because they know our side is stronger.

We need to know that and start acting like it.

A Neat Trick

Gannett Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists presume to decide what's extreme and what's "commonsense,"  and they use every talking point in the gungrabbers playbook to do it. [Read]

We're the Only Ones A-Hunting We Will Go Enough

Be vewy, vewy quiet. We're poaching! Heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh! [Read]

[Via Roger J]

Who We Are

We are a group of non-partisan concerned citizens who have gathered together to create a March on Washington for Gun Control through the leadership of Molly Smith and Suzanne Blue Star Boy. [More]
Well, alrighty, then.

[Via Robert H]

Dear Mr. Security Agent

Matt Bracken lays it all out.  Wow.

Read.

Understand.

Share.

Riddle Me This

What's more valuable in San Francisco than you and your children's lives?

George Lam's jewels, of course! (Scroll down to "Packing heat"--only one carry permit was issued in 2012)

[Via impizulu]

"NRA Members' Gun Safety Act"

Look what's been reintroduced:
The purpose of this title is to extend the Brady Law background check procedures to all sales and transfers of firearms ... REQUIRING A BACKGROUND CHECK FOR EVERY FIREARM SALE ... REQUIREMENT THAT GUN OWNERS REPORT LOST OR STOLEN FIREARMS TO STATE OR LOCAL POLICE
Is it just me, or does that title sound downright Orwellian? Seeing as how its author is Jim (any relation to "Bugs"?) Moran, that's hardly surprising.

Understand: NRA has nothing to do with this--the lying antis have appropriated their name because they can't do anything without resorting to deception. We should actually be encouraged by that.

Meanwhile, Across the Pond in Sarah Brady Paradise...

Myleene Klass, the broadcaster and model, brandished a knife at youths who broke into her garden – but has been warned by police that she may have acted illegally. [More] 
Well, that explains Piers Morgan.

Ultimately, the Problem is the State

In re my ethics complaint against Gannettfor outing permit holders, correspondent "Frank in Atlanta asks:
WHY are we sitting around being mad that the horse got out -- when the REAL culprit is the state:  WHY is the barn door being left open in the first place ?
He's got a point, and adds a similar concern about arrest records and the damage done with those.  I'll email him back and ask for permission to include his entire email as an update to this post, because he raises some really good points.

Correspondent "Bklyn" shared another disturbing link that bolsters Frank's contentions.  Check this out.

Interesting, this "activist" concerned in identifying others is masking himself.

UPDATE: I received permission from "Frank in Atlanta"--here is what he wrote:
Greetings David,

I appreciated your 1/5/13 Examiner article questioning media ethics.   I see a connection with Dave Workman's Examiner 1/5 article tying the 1st and 2nd Amendments together.  I offer 2 counterpoints then 3 questions that are "outside the box" for the present discussion.  FYI, put your 2 articles together with what I share below and there is something going on in the Georgia legislature which the NRA needs to get involved in asap.

POINT 1:  Mad at the Wrong Guys:  gun owner records are "information assets" which are "owned" by the state.  So is the state adequately protecting these assets, given the debate of safety for individuals versus FOIA for the neighborhood ?  What is the gain vs loss in "outing" gun owners ?  FYI, newspapers, TV et al are AMORAL entities that sustain revenue through info-tainment (titillation).  So WHY are we sitting around being mad that the horse got out -- when the REAL culprit is the state:  WHY is the barn door being left open in the first place ?!   Said another way, if you leave meat on the table with the dog in the room to go answer the door, when you come back the meat is GONE.  Dogs will be dogs.  The fault lay with the meat owner, not the dog.  Only 1 of those can institutionally change their nature.

POINT 2:  Gun Records and Arrest Records vs "outing" people -- a similar ethics question:   what's true of mis-used gun records is also true of ARREST records.  How many people do you know, who were found innocent of a minor crime 10 years ago or more, have recently had "sealed" arrest records show up on a mugshots.com type website run by low-lifes out to shame people into paying to take it down ?  These sites take the damage further by letting viewers tag their mugshot photo with sexual references, and it includes a google map link to their home address.

7 million people in the USA and counting are impacted by this -- that's a lot of people who suddenly would become supporters of the NRA if it was to position to treat mugshots and gun records as a common cause.

A "mugshots.com" type website but for outing gun owners ?  You too will soon be branded on dozens of internet websites as "a hottie" along with your address and photo online -- IT'S COMING unless the people act NOW.

THREE QUESTIONS:  On mugshots and gun records, the state must again be questioned as the meat-hungry dog strikes again to the detriment of 7 million americans and counting.

First question, why should the state "out" people by posting the arrests online and harming that individual's reputation BEFORE the case has been concluded (at least for non-violent crimes and first-time offenders) ?  Media gets potpourri to get ratings and sell papers, but otherwise what value comes from this ?

Second question, in protecting the info asset, there is a chain of custody issue:  3rd parties archive old arrests independent of the official source because they know that many of them will eventually be sealed, and along the way they fail to keep them up to date, and so become dirt purveyors to prospective employers and gossip seekers (e.g. rent-a-cop companies, Spokeo, Intelius, Mugshots.com). The state fails to assert info asset ownership and citizens needlessly suffer.  Contrast this with the heavy regulation by the state of credit bureaus subject to litigation for failure to keep current and accurate info.  A double standard ?

Third question,  the federal courts have ruled to withhold federal arrest records from the mugshot profiteers as they argue that public interest would not be served versus loss to the individuals in outing them.  Yet I hear that the Obama administration wants to publish the complete gun owner registry ?  Another double standard ?

Gun records and arrest records are one in the same:  and a "mugshots.com" to out gun-owners is COMING.  This is a PRIVACY issue, to which we must look at proper control by the state over "information assets" and "chain of custody" and "intellectual property ownership" of those assets.   And sharing these outside of law enforcement and government offices, in this new age of "the internet of everything" is an ethics and safety issue.  A more clear line around the FOIA is required.  Dave Workman's Examiner article this week pointing to Sanford Levinson's work is timely.  It's time to deal with the 2nd and 1st Amendments together head-on.  Peoples very lives, and livelihoods, are at stake here.  And in the meantime, let's not allow ourselves to be intimidated by AMORAL mass media and the 2-edged sword of FOIA.  The state serves the people well before it need serve the press.

UPDATE: Class action in 2013 by Ga Rep Bruce on Mugshots:  http://www.11alive.com/News/Crime/268273/445/Georgia-lawmaker-wants-to-police-mugshot-websites

Toning Down the Rhetoric

Marine Who Penned Scathing Letter to Sen. Feinstein Says Anti-Gun Leftists Are Now Calling for His Death [Read and watch] 
Gomer?

This guy sure looks like a rising star to me.

Going Underground

I'll be on the Moretti Underground/Liberty Report tonight. The program starts at 6 p.m. Eastern, and I'll be joining in at 7. [Listen] 

Call in # 646-716-6625

Fight for your life today

And pass the link to this outstanding piece on to everyone you know. [More]

ISRA reports no movement on gun ban bills

A feared Sunday surprise led by anti-gun Rep. Eddie Acevedo to amend a semi-automatic firearm/normal capacity magazine ban bill has been forestalled, Illinois State Rifle Association reported last night, announcing the House adjourned with no movement. [More] 
This morning's Gun Rights Examiner report notes a day of rest, but cautions against falling asleep.

This Day in History: January 7

[More]

Sunday, January 06, 2013

Armed American Radio Tonight

I'll be rejoining Mark Walters tonight on Armed American Radio.  The program airs from 8 to 11 p.m. Eastern, and his guests tonight include Rich Burgess of Connecticut Carry, Chris Juelich of Gander Mountain, Sean Caranna of Florida Carry and then the Roundtable at 10, when I'll join in, typically also with George "Mad Ogre" Hill and producer Sean "Seanto" Young.

Click here to go to the AAR website, then select the appropriate tab to find one of the nationwide stations near you, or to listen via live streaming if you're not in range of one.

Talking Guns

I'll be rejoining Kate Krueger today at 3:10 p.m. Eastern.  There's a "listen live" function for those who live outside the KFNX 1100 Phoenix broadcast range.

Old USA Today poll asks wrong question on Second Amendment

I know what they’re saying, and I know they are indicating they believe in the individual right to keep and bear arms, but it’s not the Second Amendment that “gives” it to us, and letting that false premise spread unchallenged works against us insidiously. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary notes that asking the wrong question is something sometimes done by design.

A Clear Record of Failure

Tom Gresham has an op-ed in the Columbus Dispatch.  [Read]

Saturday, January 05, 2013

Illinois legislature holding surprise Sunday gun ban amendment vote

“This is outrageous even for Illinois; they have no respect for the people!” an activist source informed Gun Rights Examiner. “They are doing this to minimize any effort to rally support against the Gun Ban Bill/Amendment, even the NRA/ISRA lobbyist must make a special trip back to Springfield. [More]
Today's second Gun Rights Examiner report passes on an urgent alert requiring immediate action. Please take a moment to share and help.

Gestapo USA

I'll be looking forward to the JBT trials after we get through all this. [Watch]

UPDATE: (Question put to Rampant Injustice, prompted by a comment to this post)
 

Dangers of Gannett’s ethics violation outing gun owners continue to emerge

“I don't know exactly what he did, but apparently there are a bunch of very nasty people who are very angry with him,” Krafft continued. “The kind of nasty who don't see it as overkill to rape and murder a man's family in front of him before they necklace him. His telephone, cars and home are all listed in his wife's maiden name, and he has worked very hard to stay off the radar. But, unsurprisingly, he has a gun permit and your White Plains paper just put his name and address out on the internet for anyone to see.” [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner offering follows up on an ethics complaint.  You can join in too, you know, and I rather wish you would, if for no other reason than to tell some fascist Fourth Estate Fifth Columnists what you think of them.

Speaking of What "We Need"...

Where the hell is Princess Leia when you really need her? [Read]

Of alarms, militias, and destiny

Stop what you're doing and go read this. [Read]

Then share the link.

And encourage everyone to send the link to their federal and state reps.

Bob Owens always does great work.  It's been even greater of late.

[Via Neil W]

Friday, January 04, 2013

I thank you for your time and kind attention to this matter.

Bruce W. Krafft calls more attention to it.  [Read]

You can, too, you know.

No Harm, Foul

Police say King wasn't disorderly, threatening or trying to prove a point. He merely had the gun with him when Turkeyfoot Valley Area school employee noticed it. [More]
So can we expect Howard Kurtz and Greta Van Susteren to decry the snitch and those charging and prosecuting King as silly resource-wasters?

Decision Time

[E]ach of us must decide now what form our resistance will take. [More]
And then make sure you're ready when you decide it's time to implement it.

ATF head, D.C. police chief challenged on selective magazine ban enforcement

How about it? Even though Gregory is evidently against the right to keep and bear arms and I’m for it, do my political and journalistic purposes deserve equal protection with his? He made his point, and apparently has been allowed to do so with impunity. If I try to make mine, will I be arrested, thrown in the slammer with truly dangerous criminals, and prosecuted to the full extent of the law for willfully violating the same statute you have, to date, let one of the media elites who favors policies you support skate on? [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column asks if we can play, too.

ATSNTV "Stop the Threat" Encore

Tonight: Convenience Store Robbery  [Details]

New Federal Gun Legislation

Courtesy of NoloContendre on AR15.com... [Read]

The termites are busy.

Funny What Passes for Libertarianism These Days

Daniel Honan appears to be projecting his own "befuddlement." [Read]

This is what passes for "expert contributors" at Big Think?  This is what passes for big thinking?

"Nudges" from Cass Sunstein? Really?

And as for Holder's plans, Honan left out the key part.  That was a deliberate choice on his part, which is all you need to know about his "libertarian" leanings, "paternal" or otherwise.

[Via Plug Nickel Times]

Flip-Flops

Why grow a pair when you can buy a pair? [Read]

[Via Ron W]

The Prevention Experts

If they're qualified to dispense advice used to create binding policy, they ought to be able to tell us what they individually would they be prepared to do if a crazed attacker burst into one of their meetings. [Read]

Attending police and Malloy's bodyguards excluded, of course. Plus the meetings will no doubt be held in a secured location under armed protection, so never mind.

Gosh, it would be easy to issue pronouncements like "These things aren't needed for hunting deer. You don't need a 30-round clip to honor the Constitution."

That is, if you were a career liar and an elitist oath-breaking hypocrite.

If You Drink, Don't Write

Should therefore the Beer Institute suggest that professional drunks patrol the bars and parking lots on the basis that the only person to stop a bad drunk is a good drunk? [More]
Michael Lewis must have been drunk when he wrote this. Because the pink elephants he conjures up in his "fantasies" are the stuff of delirium.

Subsidies

Let the gun makers go where they're welcome. [Read]

"Authorized Businesses" are every bit as insidious as "Authorized Journalists."

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act: An Overview of Limiting Tort Liability of Gun Manufacturers

Here's a new report, well, from Dec. 20, published by Congressional Research Service and made available for us by the Federation of American Scientists. [Read]

I've written about these reports before (many times, actually, including posting documents I've obtained outside of normal channels), recommending that more concerned citizens need to become aware of the existence and value of them, and then demand they be shared by Congress. As is, we're dependent on leaks and activists, instead of having a straightforward path to a work product we pay for.

Estupefacto

There are so many things I could say, but I think I'll just let this story speak for itself. [Read]

Jekyll and Hyde

Hey, "Authorized Journalists" have to eat too, you know... [Read]

The Three Stooges

Garry, Snuffy and Rahm... [Read]

Which one gets to be "Moe"?
N'yuk, n'yuk, n'yuk...

Better a fire hose than that fuel nozzle you're playing with matches around, Garry.
C'mere, you...

Woobwoobwoobwoobwoob!

The Nuclear Option

Stop the annihilation. [Read]









See how easy it was to do what they ask? 

Enter the Lawyers

Lawsuit Filed Against Journal News Sparked By Map of Gun Owners [More]
Good.

Stupid oughtta hurt.

Evil oughtta hurt more.

[Via Neil W]

If I Had a Hammer

Is it time to call for 'hammer control'? [More]
Michael Carl of WND.com cites some inconvenient truths and talks to some familiar characters along the way...

The Final Solution


It always starts like this. [Read]

Be funny to sic the environmentalcases on 'em...

Armed Teacher Training

Buckeye Firearms Association is requesting donations to help them defray the costs. [Read]

Riddle Me This

By all means, let us ban these weapons. [Read]
What's this "us"?  Got a mouse in your pocket? My weapons aren't yours to ban, you self-impressed tool.


You offer us no riddle, just a sick and cowardly declaration of war against those of us who will defy and resist any such attempt to break us and impose your evil wishes. Some of us will buy neither your stupid black helicopter cop-out, nor your Borg declaration that resistance is futile and ridiculous. If you think the fight is going to be prosecuted on our doorsteps, at the time and place of your proxies' choosing, you're too pathetically ignorant and unimaginative to even be in this classroom, let alone to presume to lecture it.

Sam has designated himself the final arbiter of what's extreme and what's reasonable.  Because he says so, so there. That must be why there's no provision for comments under his idiot long-winded screed.

Hey, whoever trains this Quisling and sells him guns -- stop it. He doesn't deserve any consideration from the gun community, and you're giving aid and comfort to a domestic enemy.  And another Sam would like to have a word with him.

[Via W3]

This Day in History: January 4

However, on January 4, 1781 during the second British invasion of Virginia, Benedict Arnold reached Richmond with about 1,000 men. The militia had, for the most part, abandoned the few defensive positions around the capital leaving it open to the British. Prior to Arnold’s arrival, the Virginia government had moved to the safety of Charlottesville. [More]

Thursday, January 03, 2013

Coalition sends open letter opposing gun ban to Congress

“Members of the National Coalition to Stop the Gun Ban demand that Congress refuse to use lawful gun owners as political scapegoats and instead reduce school violence by defeating any attempt to pass gun control including, but not limited to, banning semi-automatic firearms or magazines, or requiring private gun transfers to be registered through the National Instant Check System; and repealing the Gun Free School Zones Act of 1996,” the letter states. [More]
This evening's Gun Rights Examiner report spotlights a coalition standing fast against compromise, and notes a conspicuous absence.

Magazine Ban 2013?

I just got sent the link to this video. [Watch]

What is the bill number? THOMAS is not listing anything sponsored by DeGette.

I see other news sources are reporting on this, so I'm going to assume it's legit, but If we're going to spring into action, let's take a moment to check this out first, see who is on board, how big of a threat it really is, and coordinate things a bit, even if time is of the essence.

UPDATE: Here's her announcement.

We're NOT the Only Ones

Dana Safety Supply Stops Selling Semi Auto Rifles to Civilians So Sheriff Pulls His Business [More] 
Kudos to the sheriff.

As for the Quislings, let them know you're spreading the word.

Legacy

"[T]he legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view." [More]
Doesn't this just tell you everything you want to know?

There Oughtta Be a Law!

FBI: More People Killed with Hammers, Clubs Each Year than Rifles [More]
And there are absolutely no controls!!!

A Special Allure

I guess pointing out that there are already laws out the ying-yang saying "criminals" can't have them and can't use them to commit crimes would be a waste of everyone's time...? [Read]  

And then there's this:
I'm not a guy who shoots a lot. My handgun scores are very marginal. 

Interesting choice of "experts."  What else doesn't he know?  Besides how to tie a half-Windsor knot?

Another "Pro-Gun Democrat"

With friends like these... [Read]

"Doing All That We Can"

A "progressive" transplant from Illinois thinks the proper response to Newtown is by banning gun shows in NC. [Read]

Be sure to check out the "logic" of Esther Manheimer.

Oh, and look who's helping him amplify his voice.

John Richardson is kicking @$$ over in comments on the guy's blog.


By Way of Comparison

To show the extreme levels of gun buying here's a point to ponder: Total WWII wartime production of the M-1 Garand, the American military's primary battle rifle of the era, was just over 4 million. [More]
Huh. Somebody's preparing for something...

Full Court Press in Illinois

Another Democratic state lawmaker, Antonio Munoz, introduced the ban on all assault weapons “designed for war.” [More]
Perhaps he could list all the "industrialized country" military groups that use semi-autos as their standard issue arms...?

As an aside, let's take a moment and enjoy some of the "monopoly of violence" advantages enjoyed by Illinois "Only Ones":


UPDATE: Kurt puts things in perspective.

Gannett requested to investigate ethics of anti-gun personnel

Because we're not talking mere opinion here -- their reckless, agenda and in Kaul's case, hate-driven actions could actually endanger lives in the communities you claim you have a "sacred opportunity" to "serve" with "integrity." [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner action decides it's time to invoke my "Any chair in a bar fight" tactic and play with some heads.  Feel free to join in.

Friends in High Places

And it's encouraging that he and other GOP leaders consider assessing gun laws to be part of such a task force's mission. [More]
But we can relax, because he got an NRA endorsement with this stirring leadership testimonial:
Senator Stewart Greenleaf has enjoyed the benefits of an endorsement before, and we’re not aware of anything from the last cycle that would change that.

I feel better already.

We're the Only Ones Grand Slammed Enough

According to news reports, five plain-clothes detectives were enjoying a meal in the restaurant when a customer noticed one of them carrying a gun. Reports say that all of them were also wearing badges either on their belt or around their neck. A manager approached the group and told them that they would have to take their guns back to their cars, as it was “company policy” to allow only uniformed officers to carry firearms, and the business was clearly posted as such. [More]
Outrageous, treating them like other customers! Especially since Denny's is doing a Hobbit movie-themed promotion right now, and they were all wearing their magic talismans. So they got their Moons over My Hammy out of there...

This Day in History: January 3

The officer's have given convincing proofs that every thing possible was done by them to check the Mutiny upon its first appearance, and it is to be regretted that some of them have fallen sacrifices to their Zeal. [More]

Wednesday, January 02, 2013

EXCLUSIVE: Feeding Frenzy

Meanwhile, a Gannett newspaper in New York published an interactive map with the addresses of gun permit holders, and another of their papers in Iowa published an editorial calling for repeal of the Second Amendment, declaring the NRA a terrorist organization, making ownership of semi-autos a felony, and killing gun owners who refused to give theirs up. Really. [More]
"Feeding Frenzy," a summary of some of the more egregious assaults on gun owners over the past few weeks, is my latest "Rights Watch" column for GUNS Magazine.

Relocated


Constitution Watch's Gun Rights Examiner aggregator, that is... [More]

We're the Only Ones Talking a Walk on the Wild Side Enough

Because he had not been fired for those similar wrongdoings, Hochhauser determined that Barker couldn't be fired this time either. [More]
Everybody had to pay and pay...

The Enemy Within

I have only one thing to add: There should also be ample rewards for those who rat out anyone who is hiding an assault weapon in his/her possession. [More]
Yet this person's Facebook page says "Self Employed. 25 years engraving firearms."

WTF? 

I see she's also as historically ignorant as Piers Morgan.  And not just about technology, but about how kindly resistance units traditionally take to collaborators and snitches.

Love, Indian Style

Women in Delhi are rushing to apply for gun licenses in the aftermath of the gang rape and murder of a 23-year-old medical student who died in hospital last weekend, but most will be left defenseless as a result of India’s strict gun control laws. [More]
Sorry, gals. That's the way Rekha and Sanjay love it. So much that they're demanding we import it here.
 
[Via Jess]

Leaning Forward

Oh look, another genocidal madman to join whatshisname Kaul... [Read]

Yep, these are just the people I want to cede a monopoly of violence to.

[Via Mack H]

Convenience Store Robbery

From American Trigger Sports Network:
In this week's crime re-enactment, a man and his pregnant wife shop in a convenience store, when a robber enters with a shotgun demanding cash. Stop the Threat host,  James B. Towle and guests Rob Pincus, Kelly Muir and Marc MacYoung weigh in on this incident and offer their expert comments in a lively discussion.

Watch on the PURSUIT Channel!
DISH Network: Channel 240 HUNT
DirecTV: Channel 604 PRST
Wednesdays 2:00pm PST 5:00pm EST
Thursdays 10:00pm PST
Fridays 6:00pm PST/9:00pm EST
Fridays 1:00am EST

Comments for This Page are Closed

All things considered, that's hardly surprising. [Read]

Maybe he'll write another column complaining about what those mean old gun owners have said to him.

[Via bondmen]

A Moderate Republican

Maybe we will also disagree about the fact that if the government decides to go door-to-door, you and your arms, no matter how powerful, stand no chance. [More] 
 Not very imaginative, is this no-line-in-the-sand coward?

Funny-- as final as he makes it sound, he doesn't list any credentials to assure us his opinion in this matter is informed.

[Via Michael G]

Exceeding Expectations

Armed Teachers: Over 600 Have Applied for Training [More]
But...but...but...:
Ladd Everitt, spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, said teachers groups have made clear they do not want educators armed. 
Incidentally, based on that second link and other stuff I've seen elsewhere recently, I'm delighted to see people looking into simulation scenarios.

Inconvenient Truths

Amidst the noise... [Watch]

They're Absolutely Right!

Superintendents shouldn’t be asked to decide which teachers are armed [More]
I agree.

It's none of their damned business.

Safer for Everybody!

"It will be a lot safer for the officer and for the person being shot," said Jim Greer, the CEO who joined the company in 2008. "What our products are going to do is stop and defuse threats." [More]
I thought the threat of being killed did that.

Safer for the person being shot. Good grief.

If this isn't the greatest technological innovation since the 571B Banana Slicer, I don't know what is.

For LEO use only--any bets their unions will nip this in the bud? Any surprises if someone gets the bright idea to mandate it for the rest of us?

More Things The Antis Will Need to Ban

Wood.

Metal.

Somebody'd better tell PlasticFantasticMan.

[Via Len Savage]

LAPD endangers selves and public with gun safety violation at ‘buyback’

But here’s the one question I really wanted to ask, and since all “official” media members covering the event are evidently oblivious, someone sure needs to: What the hell is one of Beck’s “Only Ones” (and where that term came from is especially significant here) doing with his booger hook on the bang switch at the “buyback”? [More] 
Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary looks at LAPD's Orwellian definition of "public safety." Oh, and I also propose a new "gun control" law at the end that we ought to all get behind--just to show that we can be "reasonable" when it comes to "commonsense" gun safety measures.  Matter of fact, I forgot to add that I think violation of it ought to be a felony.

Forget it, Jake

It's Chi-Town. [Read]

It's Not Just the Second Amendment They're Going After

Hey, why would anyone need to write this kind of poetry? [Read]

And You Can Always Pull the Covers Over Your Head

Not like this, you won't. [Watch]

Tell me their "Only Ones" simulation didn't present a perfect target with no danger of harming anyone else in the line of fire:
"What we've learned about these active shooting events is that the goal of the shooter is to harm as many people as possible."

No, duh. And there's a difference between training and conditioning.
"We need to take out own personal safety seriously."
Some of us do take our own personal safety seriously, Gail Orr-Smith. We also take seriously anyone who would impede our right and ability to preserve that safety.What we don't take seriously are incompetents dishing out the stupid like they're some kind of authority.

You go be a rabbit.

Nuts!

In my view, psychological testing should be required to assess a permit applicant’s mental stability. [More]
And, of course, if you want one, you're paranoid and dangerous.

Hypocrisy Doesn't Even Begin to Cover It

Armed guards from RGA Investigations have taken up post at the Journal News’ Rockland County headquarters  [More]
What steaming piles these wretched people are.

This Day in History: January 2

Resolved, That the above named Gentlemen, or any two of them, or when more are present in Congress a Major part of them, be and they hereby are fully impowered, with the Delegates who are or may be appointed from the other American States, to Concert, Direct and Order such further measures as appear to them best calculated for the Establishment of the Rights, Liberty and Independence of the United States of America, upon a Basis permanent and Secure against the Power and Art of the Brittish Nation; for prosecuting the present War, concluding Peace, Contracting Alliances, Establishing Commerce, and guarding against any future Encroachments and Machinations of the Enemies of the United States; with Power to adjourn to such times and places as shall appear most Conducive to the Public Safety and advantage:--And it is hereby injoined, that at least four of the said Gentlemen constantly attend on the business of their Delegation. [More]