Saturday, December 05, 2009

Lego Gun Reaction Shows Conditioned Views on Armed Citizens

After all, we're talking Canada here, where seeing a citizen with a handgun--especially in Toronto--is deemed a shocking (and generally illegal) sight. Still, there are plenty of examples we could point to here in the land of the Second Amendment where our countrymen would react with equal panic, and our police with an equally forceful response. Yet add the magical trappings of a government-issued uniform with a badge amulet, and seeing an accompanying weapon on a fellow human is accepted as the natural order of things... [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column deals with perceptions we must work to change.

Also get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

This Day in History: December 5

Friday, December 04, 2009

Bloomington Herald-Times Denies Treating Gun Owners Like Sex Offenders

Gun owner and correspondent HZ followed up on reports that the Bloomington Herald-Times was "treat[ing] law-abiding gun owners like registered sex offenders."

...Per editor Robert Zaltzberg in his reply to HZ's inquiry:

"It is not true..." [More]


New information has been given to me on a story we've talked about that made a second Gun Rights Examiner column for today appropriate.

An Unsubstantiated Rumor

Remember when I said "Go ask Alice"?

Daniel White says "Not so fast."

Orders We Will Not Obey Redux

Kurt told us of a sheriff who won't obey orders that affect us.

Kevin tells us of one who won't obey orders that affect him.

Orders We Will Not Obey

In what may be the most remarkable part of this story is that Sheriff Alberden is publicly backing that position up--saying that his department will not enforce a campus gun ban. [More]
Kurt thinks the sheriff's position sounds familiar.

We're the Only Ones Not Forgiving You Our Trespasses Enough

Jeremy Engelking will appear in Douglas County court this afternoon to face a trespassing charge. But here’s the kicker: The Superior man allegedly trespassed on his own property. [More]
Squeeze. Like only the "Only Ones" can.

What do you think, Sgt. Bob Smith and the rest of the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department...

Do you think if someone you treat like this ever sees one of you in trouble he'll be inclined to help...you?

[Via Mark G]

Yo Ho, Yo Ho...

...a broker's life for me... [More]

This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation to buy securities. The information is current as of 12/04/2009 and is not a guarantee of subsequent investment composition, which is subject to change at the discretion of the portfolio manager. This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current Somali Voluntary Coast Guard Trust prospectus and a Sea Steward® Variable Annuity prospectus, all of which contain more complete information, including all charges, expenses, risk factors, and limitations. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

[Via Plug Nickel Times]

Scary


This video...[More]

I'm sure glad I can turn to stories about Tiger and Meredith, and not have to think about unpleasant possibilities like this.

[Via Tina T]

Why We Have Murder

Because you don't trust government. [More]

An academic said it, I believe it, that settles it.

Just in case any of you selfish gun owners thought it was because too many people were "trusting" government to take care of what should be their own responsibilities...

First you endanger this young man here, and now this.

[Via Zachary G]

If Only We Had Common Sense Gun Laws...

...this would never happen. [More]

Wouldn't it be worth a few sacrifices on your part to see that it doesn't?

[Via William T]

Point/Counterpoint: Seattle Times-Style

Yes, I've read the Second Amendment but no right is absolute. Police officers and other symbols of government take on a certain amount of risk to do their jobs, if restricting the flow of guns or making it more difficult to purchase guns eases our collective minds somewhat, we should consider it. [More]
The best rejoinder I can think of was spoken by Dan Akroyd.

And thing is, look who they pick to do the counterpoint: A guy who would ban guns in a future civilization he could design from scratch, as if human nature changes based on where you are.

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

What Does Meredith Baxter 'Coming Out' Have to Do with Gun Rights?

"Outing" someone against their will like this and violating their privacy is flat out an evil act of aggression. Which is why one would hope Baxter would be sympathetic to the plight of concealed carry permit holders in Indiana... [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner notes not all gun owners are ready to come out of the safe, and that's their right.

Also learn about a friend in need, get credit where credit is due, be reminded of an upcoming event, and get the very latest from my fellow GREs.

Why not out yourself as an activist gun owner and tell a friend?

This Day in History: December 4

Tho’ the Consideration of a Winters Campaign, & Practicability of an Attack on Philada have been so lately proposed, every Gentleman who extended his Views beyond the present Hour, must have turnd his Thoughts upon these Subjects so as to be able to form something more than a sudden Opinion. There cannot be any Person, Sir, either on a publick or private Account, upon whom the Motives for a Winters Campaign can operate more forcibly. I have every Reason to wish it—& yet in the State & Condition of our Army my Judgment is against it. [More]

Thursday, December 03, 2009

We're the Only Ones Searching Enough, Eh?

Ontario Provincial Police are continuing their search for a stolen gun, a police uniform and other police gear that were taken from an unmarked police vehicle stolen from a police officer's driveway earlier this week. [More]
Aboot par for the course, eh? For "Only Ones," eh?

First Christmas Carol of the Season

We know when you've been sleeping
We know when you're awake...[More]

And remember, "they" hate us because we're free.

[Via Zachary G]

Trinidad and Tobago Pirates Take Australian Hostage

An Australian boat captain accused of having high-powered rifles and 2000 rounds of ammunition was arrested in Trinidad and Tobago...[More]
Looks like he was worried about the wrong group of cutthroats.

[Via Nightlights]

A Government Solution

Struggling media will need government help [More]
Kämpfen Medien?

Well, as long as Henry says we need it...

And then if we malreport anything, Recdep can fix it.

Of course, you'll probably be too occupied with all that prolefeed the versificators are cranking out to make it much of a problem.

[Via Plug Nickel Times]

We're the Only Ones on ICE Enough

A former high-ranking Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent accused of supplying drug traffickers with privileged information and trafficking in cocaine is set to plead guilty this week to some or all of the charges. [More]
Thank goodness they didn't say anything about guns--but then, we know from experience the cartels get all theirs due to our lax gun laws, that would work a lot better if we could just throw some more "Only Ones" at them.

[Via Harvey]

Disarm the Terrorist-Enabling NRA!

Kurt points us to the demented howling demands of a very strange and twisted creature. [More]

Mark Karlin
just sounds more and more desperate, ineffectual and irrelevant these days, doesn't he? It's gotta be tough knowing that even if he gets everything he wants by way of legislation and court rulings, he still will not have succeeded in disarming the critical mass of us capable of actively resisting enforcement.

Here, Mark. Put this in and go tremble and seethe in a corner somewhere. We understand why you are what you are, and some of us may even try not to point and laugh at you.

Just not me, because I think you're ridiculous.

What Does Tiger Woods Story Tell Us About 'Gun Control'?

If it could be proven that Elin Nordegren committed an act of domestic violence, should she be arrested, tried, convicted and forever barred from gun ownership--just like someone of lesser wealth and status could be? Take today's poll and let me know what you think. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column attempts to ascertain if people have really thought through what equal application of the Lautenberg amendment means.

Also help a pro-RKBA challenger to John McCain, get reminded of two ground-breaking videos, and access the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

This Day in History: December 3

I receivd your Excellencys orders to give you my sentiments “upon the advisability of a Winter Campaign and practicability of an attack upon Philadelphia with the aid of a considerable body of Militia assembled at an appointed time and place”. – Were it probable that Sr. Wm. Howes destruction would be the consequence of a Winter Campaign, I would most chearfully give my voice and opinion for one – I think a Winter Campaign under the present circumstances will be the inevitable destruction if not of the Liberties of the Country yet of the present Army... [More]

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

We're the Only Ones "At'sa Car She Go Fast" Enough

When the Italian police unveiled their state-of-the-art Lamborghini patrol cars, they cannot have been short of volunteers itching to take the supercars in pursuit of speeding criminals...What they apparently were not prepared for was a distracted motorist who pulled out of a petrol station without looking. [More]
Ah, the "O Solo Mios."

Still, it looks like my prediction didn't come true.

Bobbi-de-boopy?

A Member in Good Standing

I am a member, and I've passed this on to other members. Perhaps they may feel compelled to conversate with you, or perhaps not. As it is, we are confronted by naysayers all the time, and usually don't waste time arguing points with the close-minded. We are about action, and respecting other's opinions by letting them have them. If you are against gun control, then lobby your legislators. [More]
You respect my opinions by "letting" me "have them"?

Sonia P steps up to the plate in "Comments" to yesterday's GRE, to educate us all about the National Black Police Association.

Feel free to go educate right back.

Forget it Jake

It is, indeed, Chi-Town, where we create the problem, and then forbid you to do anything about it. The lunatics are running the asylum. [More]

I've typed in and discarded half a dozen comments--they are all inadequate. I guess Charlton Heston said it best.

We Can't Stop It

And neither can you, if we have anything to say about it. [More]

Besides, what have you got against misunderstood sea stewards?

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

We're the Only Ones Keeping Abreast of Things Enough

Allegretti, 47, pleaded guilty in 2007 to attempted intimidation and agreed to resign as a police officer over allegations that he pulled over two women on the Northwest Side and asked them to expose their breasts to avoid traffic tickets. [More]
So why wouldn't you trust him to be a field supervisor, out there enforcing parking lot rules, with semi-"Only One" authority...?

After all, it is Chi-Town...

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

The Boy Scout Motto

Be prepared. [More]

[Via Tony F]

Go Ask Alice

Common sense tells you a handgun is probably not even all that useful. Suppose an intruder sneaks past the doorman or jumps the security fence at night. By the time you pull the pistol out of your wife’s jewelry safe, find the ammunition, and load your weapon, Fifi the Pomeranian has already been taken hostage and the gun won’t do you any good. [More]
Then quickly forget everything she has to say on the subject of armed defense.

Alice is right about the difficulty ordinary mortals have getting carry permits in Furious Mike Paradise, but Goldman Sachs bigwigs are hardly ordinary mortals. So I'm sure the better-connected flimflam men, you know, the ones most responsible for incurring the wrath of their vict...uh...ruined individuals and tax cows milked for bailout money, won't alter their support for politicians who push disarmament policies one little bit.

Hell, they can afford it.

[Via M. Terry and Jeet]

About that Maniac in Seattle

Many of you sent me links over the past few days and I haven't weighed on on this yet. I'm going to base my new "Rights Watch" column for GUNS Magazine on it, plus, I wanted to see what my fellow GREs, particularly our man in Seattle, had to say about it.

Here's what they've come up with over the past few days.

From Dave Workman in Seattle:

A long history of crime should send a signal

A cop-killer is dead and now comes time for questions

From Daniel White in Cleveland:

Seattle cop slayings do not invalidate the idea of armed self-defense

From Howard Nemerov in Austin:

Four Lakewood police officers: Death by government

From John Longenecker in Los Angeles:

Gun Control: Answering the L.A. Times Editorial against guns.

In "the Enemy Camp"

You know, West Point. [More]

No wonder he thinks these guys are terrorists.

[Via Kurt Hofmann]

Would You 'Send a Gun to Defend a British Home'?

Sadly, outrageously, we learn that when the danger had passed, government trust in the people went away, and the people for the most part, obeyed in the "cleansing of firearms."

Thus today's sorry state of affairs. This is one hell of an historic account, and you won't find it anywhere else. Knowing it, how many American gun owners would be inclined to answer a similar call for help today? [More]
Most of us here have have heard about this story and seen the poster. Today's Gun Rights Examiner column introduces you to a source for many of the details you won't find anywhere else--a feature in a 50-year-old issue of GUNS Magazine. And I ask you to weigh in through a poll.

Also learn about next week's interview with the producer of "Not Without a Fight," and get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend? The account should interest gun owners with an appreciation of history, and I'd like to see the poll get wide exposure.

Vanderboegh Update

OK, looks like I'm going to live a little while longer. [More]
Mike tells us what happened.

This Day in History: December 2

The importance of the North River in the present contest and the necessity of defending it, are Subjects which have been so frequently and so fully discussed and are so well understood, that it is unnecessary to enlarge upon them. These facts at once appear, when it is considered that it runs thro' a whole State; That it is the only passage by which the Enemy from New York or any part of our Coast, can ever hope to Cooperate with an Army that may come from Canada; That the possession of it is indispensibly essential to preserve the Communication between the Eastern, Middle and Southern States; And further, that upon its security, in a great measure, depend our chief supplies of Flour for the subsistence of such Forces as we may have occasion for, in the course of the War, either in the Eastern or Northern Departments, or in the Country lying high up on the west side of it. [More]

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Stand With Kirsten!

Click to enlarge

Here's my latest on this turncoat, including links to some earlier pieces.

[Via Matthew Maynard]

Heavenly Appeal

On the Religious Origins of the Constitutional Right of Revolution [More]
Lord knows we've tried everything else...

[Via Peter G]

A Non-Competitive Procurement

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) intends to award a non-competitive, sole source purchase order to Anzio Ironworks Corporation, 1905 16th Street N, St. Petersburg, FL 33704 for two (2) Magfed 20mm Rifles and accessories...[More]
Thing is, they say it's non-competitive, but they're obviously planning to compete against somebody.

Who?

I note the source site isn't comfortable linking to the original solicitation. I have a pretty broad comfort zone, so I will.

Heck, I'll even take it a step further:

Click to enlarge

Never have reservations about speaking to the help.

[Via Seth O]

UPDATE:



Is it just me, or does this raise even more questions?

What Do We Have Left to Barter? Our Souls?‏

[Regular correspondent W-III has graciously allowed me to repost an email he sent out to his list--DC]

I’ve been told the following history lesson was delivered during a sermon a few Sundays ago to a church in Virginia. There was no documentation sent with the e-mail I received so I decided to see just exactly what the 47th chapter of Genesis actually has to say. I checked 7 different versions (translations) and the message is the same in all seven. If you would like to read all seven, I have attached a MS Word file for your, as Rod Serling was fond of saying, “perusal”. [Note: I copied and pasted it below--DC]

Four thousand years ago economic hard times fell upon Egypt , and the people turned to the government of Pharaoh to deal with this for them. Pharaoh nationalized the grain harvest, and placed the grain in great storehouses. So, the people brought their money to Pharaoh, and gave it all to him willingly in return for grain. This went on until the peoples’ money ran out and they were hungry again.

When they returned to Pharaoh for additional grain, they brought their cattle, their horses, their sheep, and their donkeys - to barter for grain, and the Genesis record says that only took them through the end of that year.

But the famine wasn't over. The next year, the people came before Pharaoh and admitted they had nothing left, except their land and their own lives. "There is nothing left in the sight of my lord but our bodies and our land. Why should we die before your eyes, both we and our land? Buy us and our land for food, and we with our land will be servants to Pharaoh." So they surrendered their homes, their land, and their real estate to Pharaoh's government, and then sold themselves into slavery to him, in return for grain.

We see the same thing happening today - the government today wants to "share the wealth" once again, to take it from us and redistribute it back to us. It wants to take control of healthcare, just as it has taken control of education, and ration it back to us, and when government rations it, then government decides who gets it, and how much, and what kind. And if we go along with it, and do it willingly, then we will wind up no differently than the people of Egypt did four thousand years ago as slaves to the government. This time, however, we will (have) become slaves to our own hired hands.

What Obama's government is doing now is no different from what Pharaoh's government did then, and it will end the same. A lot of people like to call Obama a "Messiah" and “the light bringer”. Is he a Messiah? The Egyptians said, after Pharaoh made them his slaves, "You have saved our lives; may it please my lord, we will be servants to Pharaoh".

Actually, the ancient Egyptians may have gotten a better deal than the one we’re receiving. They only had to pay out 20% of their livelihood to their government.

------------

Genesis 47, 13-26 King James Version
Joseph and the Famine
13. And [there was] no bread in all the land; for the famine [was] very sore, so that the land of Egypt and [all] the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine.
14. And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.
15. And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth.
16. And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail.
17. And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread [in exchange] for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year.
18. When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide [it] from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands:
19. Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give [us] seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.
20. And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's.
21. And as for the people, he removed them to cities from [one] end of the borders of Egypt even to the [other] end thereof.
22. Only the land of the priests bought he not; for the priests had a portion [assigned them] of Pharaoh, and did eat their portion which Pharaoh gave them: wherefore they sold not their lands.
23. Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh: lo, [here is] seed for you, and ye shall sow the land.
24. And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth [part] [20%] unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones.
25. And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants.
26. And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt unto this day, [that] Pharaoh should have the fifth [part] [20%]; except the land of the priests only, [which] became not Pharaoh's.

Genesis 47, 13-26 New International Version
Joseph and the Famine
13 There was no food, however, in the whole region because the famine was severe; both Egypt and Canaan wasted away because of the famine. 14 Joseph collected all the money that was to be found in Egypt and Canaan in payment for the grain they were buying, and he brought it to Pharaoh's palace. 15 When the money of the people of Egypt and Canaan was gone, all Egypt came to Joseph and said, "Give us food. Why should we die before your eyes? Our money is used up."
16 "Then bring your livestock," said Joseph. "I will sell you food in exchange for your livestock, since your money is gone." 17 So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and he gave them food in exchange for their horses, their sheep and goats, their cattle and donkeys. And he brought them through that year with food in exchange for all their livestock.
18 When that year was over, they came to him the following year and said, "We cannot hide from our lord the fact that since our money is gone and our livestock belongs to you, there is nothing left for our lord except our bodies and our land. 19 Why should we perish before your eyes—we and our land as well? Buy us and our land in exchange for food, and we with our land will be in bondage to Pharaoh. Give us seed so that we may live and not die, and that the land may not become desolate."
20 So Joseph bought all the land in Egypt for Pharaoh. The Egyptians, one and all, sold their fields, because the famine was too severe for them. The land became Pharaoh's, 21 and Joseph reduced the people to servitude, [c] from one end of Egypt to the other. 22 However, he did not buy the land of the priests, because they received a regular allotment from Pharaoh and had food enough from the allotment Pharaoh gave them. That is why they did not sell their land.
23 Joseph said to the people, "Now that I have bought you and your land today for Pharaoh, here is seed for you so you can plant the ground. 24 But when the crop comes in, give a fifth of it to Pharaoh. The other four-fifths you may keep as seed for the fields and as food for yourselves and your households and your children."
25 "You have saved our lives," they said. "May we find favor in the eyes of our lord; we will be in bondage to Pharaoh."
26 So Joseph established it as a law concerning land in Egypt—still in force today—that a fifth of the produce belongs to Pharaoh. It was only the land of the priests that did not become Pharaoh's.

Genesis 47, 13-26 Today’s New International Version
Joseph and the Famine
13 There was no food, however, in the whole region because the famine was severe; both Egypt and Canaan wasted away because of the famine. 14 Joseph collected all the money that was to be found in Egypt and Canaan in payment for the grain they were buying, and he brought it to Pharaoh's palace. 15 When the money of the people of Egypt and Canaan was gone, all Egypt came to Joseph and said, "Give us food. Why should we die before your eyes? Our money is all gone."
16 "Then bring your livestock," said Joseph. "I will sell you food in exchange for your livestock, since your money is gone." 17 So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and he gave them food in exchange for their horses, their sheep and goats, their cattle and donkeys. And he brought them through that year with food in exchange for all their livestock.
18 When that year was over, they came to him the following year and said, "We cannot hide from our lord the fact that since our money is gone and our livestock belongs to you, there is nothing left for our lord except our bodies and our land. 19 Why should we perish before your eyes—we and our land as well? Buy us and our land in exchange for food, and we with our land will be in bondage to Pharaoh. Give us seed so that we may live and not die, and that the land may not become desolate."
20 So Joseph bought all the land in Egypt for Pharaoh. The Egyptians, one and all, sold their fields, because the famine was too severe for them. The land became Pharaoh's, 21 and Joseph reduced the people to servitude, [c] from one end of Egypt to the other. 22 However, he did not buy the land of the priests, because they received a regular allotment from Pharaoh and had food enough from the allotment Pharaoh gave them. That is why they did not sell their land.
23 Joseph said to the people, "Now that I have bought you and your land today for Pharaoh, here is seed for you so you can plant the ground. 24 But when the crop comes in, give a fifth of it to Pharaoh. The other four-fifths you may keep as seed for the fields and as food for yourselves and your households and your children."
25 "You have saved our lives," they said. "May we find favor in the eyes of our lord; we will be in bondage to Pharaoh."
26 So Joseph established it as a law concerning land in Egypt—still in force today—that a fifth of the produce belongs to Pharaoh. It was only the land of the priests that did not become Pharaoh's.

Genesis 47, 13-26 Amplified Version
Joseph and the Famine
13[In the course of time] there was no food in all the land, for the famine was distressingly severe, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan hung in doubt and wavered by reason of the hunger (destitution, starvation) of the famine.
14And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan [in payment] for the grain which they bought, and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.
15And when the money was exhausted in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came to Joseph and said, Give us food! Why should we die before your very eyes? For we have no money left.
16Joseph said, Give up your livestock, and I will give you food in exchange for [them] if your money is gone.
17So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and [he] gave them food in exchange for the horses, flocks, cattle of the herds, and the donkeys; and he supplied them with food in exchange for all their livestock that year.
18When that year was ended, they came to [Joseph] the second year and said to him, We will not hide from my lord [the fact] that our money is spent; my lord also has our herds of livestock; there is nothing left in the sight of my lord but our bodies and our lands.
19Why should we perish before your eyes, both we and our land? Buy us and our land in exchange for food, and we and our land will be servants to Pharaoh. And give us seed [to plant], that we may live and not die, and that the land may not be desolate.
20And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field because of the overwhelming severity of the famine upon them. The land became Pharaoh's,
21And as for the people, he removed them to cities and practically made slaves of them [at their own request], from one end of the borders of Egypt to the other.
22Only the priests' land he did not buy, for the priests had a fixed pension from Pharaoh and lived on the amount Pharaoh gave them. So they did not sell their land.
23Then Joseph said to the people, Behold, I have today bought you and your land for Pharaoh. Now here is seed for you, and you shall sow the land.
24At [harvest time when you reap] the increase, you shall give one-fifth of it to Pharaoh, and four-fifths shall be your own to use for seed for the field and as food for you and those of your households and for your little ones.
25And they said, You have saved our lives! Let us find favor in the sight of my lord; and we will be Pharaoh's servants.
26And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt--to this day--that Pharaoh should have the fifth part [of the crops]; it was the priests' land only which did not become Pharaoh's.

Genesis 47, 13-26 New American Standard Bible
Joseph and the Famine
13Now there was no food in all the land, because the famine was very severe, so that the land of Egypt and the land of Canaan languished because of the famine.
14Joseph gathered all the money that was found in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan for the grain which they bought, and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.
15When the money was all spent in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came to Joseph and said, "Give us food, for why should we die in your presence? For our money is gone."
16Then Joseph said, "Give up your livestock, and I will give you food for your livestock, since your money is gone."
17So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and Joseph gave them food in exchange for the horses and the flocks and the herds and the donkeys; and he fed them with food in exchange for all their livestock that year.
18When that year was ended, they came to him the next year and said to him, "We will not hide from my lord that our money is all spent, and the cattle are my lord's. There is nothing left for my lord except our bodies and our lands.
19"Why should we die before your eyes, both we and our land? Buy us and our land for food, and we and our land will be slaves to Pharaoh. So give us seed, that we may live and not die, and that the land may not be desolate."
Result of the Famine
20So Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh, for every Egyptian sold his field, because the famine was severe upon them. Thus the land became Pharaoh's.
21As for the people, he removed them to the cities from one end of Egypt's border to the other.
22Only the land of the priests he did not buy, for the priests had an allotment from Pharaoh, and they lived off the allotment which Pharaoh gave them. Therefore, they did not sell their land.
23Then Joseph said to the people, "Behold, I have today bought you and your land for Pharaoh; now, here is seed for you, and you may sow the land.
24"At the harvest you shall give a fifth to Pharaoh, and four-fifths shall be your own for seed of the field and for your food and for those of your households and as food for your little ones."
25So they said, "You have saved our lives! Let us find favor in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's slaves."
26Joseph made it a statute concerning the land of Egypt valid to this day, that Pharaoh should have the fifth; only the land of the priests did not become Pharaoh's.

Genesis 47, 13-26 New Living Translation
Joseph’s Leadership in the Famine
13 Meanwhile, the famine became so severe that all the food was used up, and people were starving throughout the lands of Egypt and Canaan. 14 By selling grain to the people, Joseph eventually collected all the money in Egypt and Canaan, and he put the money in Pharaoh’s treasury. 15 When the people of Egypt and Canaan ran out of money, all the Egyptians came to Joseph. “Our money is gone!” they cried. “But please give us food, or we will die before your very eyes!”
16 Joseph replied, “Since your money is gone, bring me your livestock. I will give you food in exchange for your livestock.” 17 So they brought their livestock to Joseph in exchange for food. In exchange for their horses, flocks of sheep and goats, herds of cattle, and donkeys, Joseph provided them with food for another year.
18 But that year ended, and the next year they came again and said, “We cannot hide the truth from you, my lord. Our money is gone, and all our livestock and cattle are yours. We have nothing left to give but our bodies and our land. 19 Why should we die before your very eyes? Buy us and our land in exchange for food; we offer our land and ourselves as slaves for Pharaoh. Just give us grain so we may live and not die, and so the land does not become empty and desolate.”
20 So Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh. All the Egyptians sold him their fields because the famine was so severe, and soon all the land belonged to Pharaoh. 21 As for the people, he made them all slaves,[a] from one end of Egypt to the other. 22 The only land he did not buy was the land belonging to the priests. They received an allotment of food directly from Pharaoh, so they didn’t need to sell their land.
23 Then Joseph said to the people, “Look, today I have bought you and your land for Pharaoh. I will provide you with seed so you can plant the fields. 24 Then when you harvest it, one-fifth of your crop will belong to Pharaoh. You may keep the remaining four-fifths as seed for your fields and as food for you, your households, and your little ones.”
25 “You have saved our lives!” they exclaimed. “May it please you, my lord, to let us be Pharaoh’s servants.” 26 Joseph then issued a decree still in effect in the land of Egypt, that Pharaoh should receive one-fifth of all the crops grown on his land. Only the land belonging to the priests was not given to Pharaoh.

Genesis 47, 13-26 The Message
The Egyptian Famine
13 -15 The time eventually came when there was no food anywhere. The famine was very bad. Egypt and Canaan alike were devastated by the famine. Joseph collected all the money that was to be found in Egypt and Canaan to pay for the distribution of food. He banked the money in Pharaoh's palace. When the money from Egypt and Canaan had run out, the Egyptians came to Joseph. "Food! Give us food! Are you going to watch us die right in front of you? The money is all gone."
16 -17 Joseph said, "Bring your livestock. I'll trade you food for livestock since your money's run out." So they brought Joseph their livestock. He traded them food for their horses, sheep, cattle, and donkeys. He got them through that year in exchange for all their livestock.
18 -19 When that year was over, the next year rolled around and they were back, saying, "Master, it's no secret to you that we're broke: our money's gone and we've traded you all our livestock. We've nothing left to barter with but our bodies and our farms. What use are our bodies and our land if we stand here and starve to death right in front of you? Trade us food for our bodies and our land. We'll be slaves to Pharaoh and give up our land—all we ask is seed for survival, just enough to live on and keep the farms alive."
20 -21 So Joseph bought up all the farms in Egypt for Pharaoh. Every Egyptian sold his land—the famine was that bad. That's how Pharaoh ended up owning all the land and the people ended up slaves; Joseph reduced the people to slavery from one end of Egypt to the other.
22 Joseph made an exception for the priests. He didn't buy their land because they received a fixed salary from Pharaoh and were able to live off of that salary. So they didn't need to sell their land.
23 -24 Joseph then announced to the people: "Here's how things stand: I've bought you and your land for Pharaoh. In exchange I'm giving you seed so you can plant the ground. When the crops are harvested, you must give a fifth to Pharaoh and keep four-fifths for yourselves, for seed for yourselves and your families—you're going to be able to feed your children!"
25 They said, "You've saved our lives! Master, we're grateful and glad to be slaves to Pharaoh."
26 Joseph decreed a land law in Egypt that is still in effect, A Fifth Goes to Pharaoh. Only the priests' lands were not owned by Pharaoh.

We're the Only Ones Unlawful Enough

Conviction for battery of police officer stands even if officer acted unlawfully [More]
What did you think "Only Ones" meant...?

[Via David Hamel]

We're the Only Ones Unindicted Enough

Grand Jury: no indictment in police shooting [More]
I guess the conflicting witness testimony and confiscated cell phone didn't matter...

[Via Matt S]

Firsts

Mike H tells us about two: Will's and Erica's.

We're the Only Ones Who Don't Know Enough

"At some point he brandished a firearm. We do not know how he was able to obtain that firearm and ordered officers to pull off to the side of the road," Lyons said. [More]
Well, let's just see...the guy is under total "Only One" lockup and control, so how do you think he got a gun?

Hey, if total bans work this way in prison, imagine how much better they'll work in places like Chicago...oh, wait, that's not much different.

And I saw this "armed and dangerous" predator they just released on the populace prompted a Lee College lockdown. He no doubt noticed their firearms prohibition and thought better of stepping on campus.

Arcade.

His frickin' name is Arcade.

I wonder if he has a sister named Penny?

Sorry. Everything else about this story is so damn ridiculous, I figured what's a little more absurdity in the mix?

White-Out on the Dark Continent

As many as 10,000 albinos are in hiding in east Africa over fears that they will be dismembered and their body parts sold to witchdoctors...

Tanzanian government officials have said they are mobilizing police to help the embattled population, but admit it is hard to quell the attacks.

Most happen in rural areas, where there is not enough police presence, according to Lucca Haule, assistant commissioner of police. [More]

Isn't multicultural tolerance and diversity a wonderful thing? It really ignites a spark in me. And makes me want to spread the peace everywhere.


Black Police Group Endorses Same Anti-Gun Edicts Imposed by Slave Owners

Here's the crux of what we need to know about them from their "Positions" page:

"HANDGUN CONTROL. The NBPA supports national handgun legislation prohibiting further manufacturing of handguns, and limiting their sales, possession, and use.
"

Seems pretty definitive and "Only One"-like, does it not? Presumably, if we say "No," they would support using police powers to enforce such edicts against their countrymen. And the Oath Keepers are the ones we're told are the dangerous extremists? [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column reminds some plantation overseers of how they got there.

It's the fourth and concluding chapter of my series on the Brady Center brief for the McDonald case. If you missed the first three parts, they are:
Also get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

This Day in History: December 1

The King of Prussia says “the first object in Winter Quarters is Tranquility” – it is very evident if we take our Winter Quarters so near the enemy as to be Subject to frequent alarms and constant hard duty, we shall have but a small part of the present army to oppose to our enemies. [More]

Monday, November 30, 2009

Another Way of Dealing With This

This week, HeraldTimesOnline.com will launch its new gun permit database. You’ll be able to search gun permit records by county, city or town and street on HTO. [More]
Unfortunately--or perhaps fortunately--you need to subscribe to this rag to read it, so I had to link you to a forum instead of the actual newspaper website.

Some are suggesting polite and courteous emails to the editor and publisher as being the appropriate way to deal with this.

I disagree.

I think the only way to deal with this with any chance of getting results would be to target their major advertisers--set up protests with signs in front of the big car dealership, etc. Let them know what you are doing and why, and that you'll stop when they stop advertising. Then move on to the next target.

Of course, that would require having committed activists in the area willing to expend more energy than sending a polite and courteous email, so my suggestion is almost certainly impractical. Eh. My guess is only a handful will even send an email.

Until gun owners get it in their heads that there is a war on guns in this country, and it actually requires them to do something, apathy and laziness will continue being our greatest impediment. By not making this a priority while things are easy, they're increasing the odds that things will get hard.

In the mean time, there will always be those whose names don't show up on any permission lists.

Message from Mike

Just spoke with Mike, who wanted you all to know that he will be offline for an indeterminate period of time, as he was headed at that time to Trinity Medical Center in Birmingham for an evaluation of his heart. [More]
Naturally, I'll be keeping an eye on this. Those inclined to offer prayers, now seems a good time.

UPDATE: Just spoke with him. For now he's resting comfortably. Should have more info. tomorrow.

Meanwhile, Over in Tim-Tom* Paradise...


9 Slain In Bloody Holiday Weekend [More]
Forget it Jake, it's Chi-Town.

*

The People Speak

I've been noticing ads for this upcoming "special" on The History Channel.

I haven't seen such a cast of celebrity leftists assembled since the Obama campaign.

My question is, do ALL the people get to speak? Or just the ones who will still be living in mansions after ruin is brought down on the rest of us?

Click to enlarge.

And why am I suddenly thinking about Skip Coolzip?

We're the Only Ones Non-Preventive Enough

Evans said police showed her photos of Cobbs and that she identified him as her attacker. Then Cobbs, 24, walked past them on the sidewalk and implied he was going to get a gun, Evans said. But the officers didn't arrest Cobbs. Instead, she said, they told her to go to her apartment, and the officers left. [More]
Could the "Only Ones" have prevented it? Well, thanks to citizen disarmament, it's pretty damn obvious no "law-abiding citizen" could have.

Forget it Jake, it's Chi-Town.

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

A History Lesson

The state was unable to financially support enough legionary troops (especially with the loss of Spain and North Africa), and unable to convert its unarmed populace for self-defense in a timely manner. [More]
What is it that's necessary to the security of a free state again...?

And why it it that some would have us believe eviscerating that is "reasonable"?

This link is a few years old, but it contains a lesson that is timeless.

[Via cycjec]

We're the Only Ones Gathering Our Own Feedback Enough

Police Chief Robert Annese came under fire last week when it was revealed resident Ray Simond has asked the state attorney general to investigate whether Annese misused his authority trying to learn who had rented a post office box used to gather feedback on the Police Department. Simond has acknowledged renting the postal box. [More]
Reputation management, "Only Ones"-style? Besides, what's the need? If you want to find out anything about them, they have an official newsletter.

[Via Harvey]

We're the Only Ones Certified Enough

A former Pocahontas County sheriff's deputy who resigned after firing his gun at his girlfriend's house is now a police officer in Ronceverte in Greenbrier County...

"The reason we hired him is we are a small police department and at the time, he was the only certified officer that applied," said Ronceverte Chief Michael L. Smith. [
More]
Is that "certified" or "certifiable"?

With "Only Ones," does the distinction matter?

[Via KABA Newslinks]

IIA March

Western Rifle Shooters Association has the details. [More]

The leader in the effort is this guy, who you can meet in "Not Without a Fight."

The Immunity Syndrome

The doctrine holds that judges with bad intentions, as well as those with good intentions, are immune from suit. [More]
Mind you, that doesn't guarantee them immunity from justice. It simply means that can't be obtained within the scope of protected means of redress.

[Via The Agitator]

Why Do SEIU Enforcers Oppose You Having Guns?

What's also clear by their signing the Brady brief, the IBPO is endorsing edicts forbidding the keeping and bearing of arms by any but the "Only Ones" as "reasonable." I'm sure by now those of you who have visited their site will have noticed they are part of a greater Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and may be wondering if the recent beating of a state worker at an SEIU meeting because he "wanted to expose alleged corruption within the union," and the earlier "smashing a black man on the cement and calling him n*****" at a town hall meeting may help explain why they promote citizen disarmament. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column reminds the help who the boss is supposed to be.

This is part three in a series. If you missed the posts this weekend, you can read parts one and two here:
Also find out how to help a friend, meet some Connecticut gun owners, and get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

This Day in History: November 30

Resolved. That General Washington be directed to publish in General orders, that Congress will speedily take into consideration the merits of such officers as have distinguished themselves by their intrepidity and their attention to the health and discipline of their men; and adopt such regulations as shall tend to introduce order and good discipline into the army, and to render the situation of the officers and soldiery, with respect to cloathing and other necessaries, more eligible than it has hitherto been. [More]

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Liberty Culture First

Any regulation makes about as much sense as ownership of another human being. Just a little is out of the question because it is unAmerican. [More]
John Longenecker adds more perspective to the "reasonability" argument.

We're the Only Ones Spraying and Praying Enough

For 62 hours, beginning 9.20 pm on November 26, 2008, Indian security forces, including the Mumbai police and the National Security Guard, fired 36,000 bullets to combat the 10 Lashkar-e-Taiba men. [More]
Meanwhile, the people being directly attacked, the ones who would know damn well who to shoot at and have targets in sight, were forbidden by law to have the means to defend themselves--and were reliant on the gang that couldn't shoot straight, that is, the "Only Ones," to save them.

Which could explain the results...

And which is just the way the IACP wants things here.

Where Are Michaele and Tareq?

I see from today's WorldNetDaily this is not the first time these social-climbing publicity junkies have stalked The One. I wouldn't mind seeing someone host a "Where's Waldo"-type contest, to see the creative places around the Lightworker-in-Chief where people with true PhotoShop skills could make the Crashin' Salahi's appear...

The most heavily-guarded location and event in the world--and we're supposed to believe the "homeland" is secure.

Meanwhile, work to disarm the ones the Founders deemed "necessary to the security of a free state."

That makes sense.

Chicago Gun Case: Top Globalist Cops Say Keeping Americans Disarmed is 'Reasonable'

Keep your stinking globalist paws off our guns. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column gives a reasonable response.

Part One was yesterday.

Also get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

This Day in History: November 29

I am favored with yours of the 20th. I see no reason for changing my former opinion, in respect to Sinking the frigates to insure their safety. If they are weighed again and converted into Barracks for the seamen, they must be brought near the Shore and when the frost sets in, they cannot be sunk, should the Enemy approach at such time. I however leave the matter to your judgment. [More]

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Come Celebrate a Death

Joyce Foundation Funded OSU 2nd Amendment Center Expires [More]
Meanwhile, a hissy-fitting academic who can't spell "amendment" gets all bitchy about things. Yeah, I'm talking about you, Con-- oh, I'm sorry, I misspelled your name. And you being so self-important and relevant and all...

[Via Michael G]

We're the Only Ones Importing Enough

The Customs and Border Protection employee arrested on bribery and marijuana smuggling charges was an administrator at the Ysleta Port of Entry, a prosecutor said Monday.

Martha Alicia Garnica, 43, a former CBP inspector and El Paso police officer, appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Richard Mesa for a detention hearing. [More]
Because "Only Ones" are more trustworthy than you and I...

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

We're the Only Ones Reprimanded Enough

He declined to identify the officers or say how or why they were punished. [More]
Well, of course.

Why would it be in the public interest to know which "Only Ones" think taking citizens hostage and turning them into gorilla hunt trophies is all in a day's work?

Besides, forget it Jake, it's Chi-Town. Even when we move operations over to Pittsburgh.

[Via The Bitter Clinger]

Chicago Gun Case Brief Shows Prohibitionists Unreasonable

What they're saying in the Chicago case is essentially the same thing they said in the Heller Washington D.C. case: Gun bans are "reasonable" and consistent with the Second Amendment proscription that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

This does not surprise anyone who has been watching these Brady characters for any length of time. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column shows what the Bradys mean when they say "reasonable common sense gun laws."

Also get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?